Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Phosphorus and Bio-fertilizers on Yield, Nutrient Content and Uptake of Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]

Maya Yadav; S.S. Yadav; Sunil Kumar; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
13
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Khari season of 2014 on loamy sand soil to study the effect of phosphorus levels and bio-fertilizers on productivity, nutrient content and uptake of urban. Experiment consisted of four treatments of phosphorus levels (0, 20, 40 and 60 kg/ha) and four treatments of bio-fertilizers (control, PSB, VAM and PSB + VAM) thereby making sixteen treatment combinations tested in randomized block design with three replications. Result indicated that application of phosphorus up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased grain and straw yield, net returns, protein content in grain, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw and total uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium over preceding levels and remained at par with 60 kg/ha. Whereas, raising the level of phosphorus from 0 to 20 kg/ha registered the highest agronomic efficiency, apparent recovery and physiological efficiency of phosphorus after that, it showed significant decline up to 60 kg/ha. Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAM significantly increased the grain and straw yield, net returns, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw, their total uptake as well as protein content in grain and available phosphorus in soil after crop harvest over PSB, VAM and control, whereas, the highest agronomic efficiency and apparent recovery of P recorded under PSB + VAM inoculation and physiological efficiency under control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased grain and straw yield over preceding levels and was at par with 60 kg/ha.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
phosphorus up to 40 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at par with 60 kg/hae0
Comparator
preceding levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of phosphorus up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased grain and straw yield, net returns, protein content in grain, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw and total uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium over preceding levels and remained at par with 60 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased net returns.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
phosphorus up to 40 kg/hae0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
preceding levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of phosphorus up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased grain and straw yield, net returns, protein content in grain, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw and total uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium over preceding levels and remained at par with 60 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased grain protein content.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
phosphorus up to 40 kg/hae0
Outcome
protein content in graine0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
preceding levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of phosphorus up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased grain and straw yield, net returns, protein content in grain, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw and total uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium over preceding levels and remained at par with 60 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased N, P and K concentration in grain and straw.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
phosphorus up to 40 kg/hae0
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and strawe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
preceding levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of phosphorus up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased grain and straw yield, net returns, protein content in grain, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw and total uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium over preceding levels and remained at par with 60 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased total N, P and K uptake.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
phosphorus up to 40 kg/hae0
Outcome
total uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassiume0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
preceding levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of phosphorus up to 40 kg/ha significantly increased grain and straw yield, net returns, protein content in grain, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw and total uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium over preceding levels and remained at par with 60 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P from 0 to 20 kg/ha gave highest agronomic efficiency and apparent recovery, followed by decline through 60 kg/ha.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
phosphorus from 0 to 20 kg/hae0
Outcome
agronomic efficiency, apparent recovery and physiological efficiency of phosphoruse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
up to 60 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“raising the level of phosphorus from 0 to 20 kg/ha registered the highest agronomic efficiency, apparent recovery and physiological efficiency of phosphorus after that, it showed significant decline up to 60 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PSB and VAM inoculation significantly increased grain and straw yield over PSB, VAM and control.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAMe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
PSB, VAM and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAM significantly increased the grain and straw yield, net returns, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw, their total uptake as well as protein content in grain and available phosphorus in soil after crop harvest over PSB, VAM and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PSB and VAM inoculation significantly increased net returns.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAMe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
PSB, VAM and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAM significantly increased the grain and straw yield, net returns, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw, their total uptake as well as protein content in grain and available phosphorus in soil after crop harvest over PSB, VAM and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PSB and VAM inoculation significantly increased N, P and K concentration in grain and straw.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAMe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and strawe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
PSB, VAM and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAM significantly increased the grain and straw yield, net returns, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw, their total uptake as well as protein content in grain and available phosphorus in soil after crop harvest over PSB, VAM and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PSB and VAM inoculation significantly increased total nutrient uptake.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAMe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
their total uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
PSB, VAM and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAM significantly increased the grain and straw yield, net returns, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw, their total uptake as well as protein content in grain and available phosphorus in soil after crop harvest over PSB, VAM and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PSB and VAM inoculation significantly increased grain protein content.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAMe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
protein content in graine0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
PSB, VAM and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAM significantly increased the grain and straw yield, net returns, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw, their total uptake as well as protein content in grain and available phosphorus in soil after crop harvest over PSB, VAM and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined PSB and VAM inoculation significantly increased soil available P after harvest.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAMe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
available phosphorus in soil after crop harveste0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
PSB, VAM and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combined inoculation of seed and soil with PSB + VAM significantly increased the grain and straw yield, net returns, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium concentration in grain and straw, their total uptake as well as protein content in grain and available phosphorus in soil after crop harvest over PSB, VAM and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB and VAM combined inoculation had the highest agronomic efficiency and apparent recovery of P.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
PSB + VAM inoculatione0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
agronomic efficiency and apparent recovery of Pe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest agronomic efficiency and apparent recovery of P recorded under PSB + VAM inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The control had the highest physiological efficiency.

Taxon
Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]Vigna mungot0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
physiological efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“physiological efficiency under control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Urban [Vigna mungo (l.) Hepper]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–113 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 59 positive, 2 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: protein · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

phosphorus · quality: protein · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

24 papers: 24 positive, 0 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.