Paper · 2017 · Environmental and Experimental Biology

Role of potassium and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of water stress on Vigna mungo

Navnita Sharma; Kuldeep Yadav; Ashok Aggarwal; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

A pot culture experiment was carried out under greenhouse conditions to study the effect of potassium fertilizer (70 mg kg -1 , K1, and 100 mg kg -1 , K2) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomus mosseae and Acaulospora laevis) alone and in different combinations on water stress amelioration of Vigna mungo during three growth stages. Treatment of the plants with mycorrhizal fungi and potassium improved physiological parameters including chlorophyll concentration, membrane stability, phosphatase activity, leaf protein concentration and mycorrhization over the untreated control regardless of water stress treatments. Imposition of water stress at reproductive stage caused maximum reduction in membrane stability, leaf protein concentration, phosphatase activity and mycorrhization as compared to stress during other stages. Treatment combinations of G. mosseae + A. laevis + K2 and G. mosseae + A. laevis + K1 proved to be the best for promoting physiological and morphological parameters studied both in stressed and unstressed plants. A combination of G. mosseae and K2 was the best among double inoculation treatments while G. mosseae was the best among single treatments of either dose of potassium and A. laevis for stress alleviation and growth amelioration. Imposition of water stress during vegetative stage had the least effect on the physiological parameters studied, except for leaf area, which was adversely affected. Chlorophyll concentration was the most affected parameter by water stress at the pod formation stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal fungi and potassium improved chlorophyll concentration, membrane stability, and phosphatase activity over untreated plants.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
mycorrhizal fungi and potassiume0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll concentration, membrane stability, phosphatase activitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of the plants with mycorrhizal fungi and potassium improved physiological parameters including chlorophyll concentration, membrane stability, phosphatase activity, leaf protein concentration and mycorrhization over the untreated control regardless of water stress treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal fungi and potassium improved leaf protein concentration and mycorrhization over untreated plants.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
mycorrhizal fungi and potassiume0
Interactor
mycorrhizal fungie0symbiont
Outcome
leaf protein concentration and mycorrhizatione0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of the plants with mycorrhizal fungi and potassium improved physiological parameters including chlorophyll concentration, membrane stability, phosphatase activity, leaf protein concentration and mycorrhization over the untreated control regardless of water stress treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–620 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress at the reproductive stage caused the greatest reduction in membrane stability, leaf protein, and phosphatase activity.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
water stress at reproductive stagee0
Outcome
membrane stability, leaf protein concentration, phosphatase activitye0
Direction
maximum reductione0
Comparator
stress during other stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imposition of water stress at reproductive stage caused maximum reduction in membrane stability, leaf protein concentration, phosphatase activity and mycorrhization as compared to stress during other stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress at the reproductive stage caused the greatest reduction in mycorrhization.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
water stress at reproductive stagee0
Outcome
mycorrhizatione0
Direction
maximum reductione0
Comparator
stress during other stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imposition of water stress at reproductive stage caused maximum reduction in membrane stability, leaf protein concentration, phosphatase activity and mycorrhization as compared to stress during other stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. mosseae with A. laevis and either potassium dose was best for physiological and morphological parameters under stress and without stress.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
G. mosseae + A. laevis + K2 and G. mosseae + A. laevis + K1e0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Second interactor
A. laevisAcaulospora laevise0symbiont
Outcome
physiological and morphological parameterse0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment combinations of G. mosseae + A. laevis + K2 and G. mosseae + A. laevis + K1 proved to be the best for promoting physiological and morphological parameters studied both in stressed and unstressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. mosseae plus K2 was the best double treatment.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
G. mosseae and K2e0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
best among double inoculation treatmentse0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
double inoculation treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of G. mosseae and K2 was the best among double inoculation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1126 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. mosseae was the best single treatment for stress alleviation and growth improvement.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
G. mosseaee0
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee0symbiont
Outcome
stress alleviation and growth amelioratione0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
either dose of potassium and A. laevise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. mosseae was the best among single treatments of either dose of potassium and A. laevis for stress alleviation and growth amelioration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1133–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative-stage water stress had the least effect on the studied physiological parameters.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
water stress during vegetative stagee0
Outcome
physiological parameterse0
Direction
least effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imposition of water stress during vegetative stage had the least effect on the physiological parameters studied, except for leaf area, which was adversely affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vegetative-stage water stress adversely affected leaf area.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
water stress during vegetative stagee0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
adversely affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imposition of water stress during vegetative stage had the least effect on the physiological parameters studied, except for leaf area, which was adversely affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll concentration was the most affected parameter under water stress at pod formation.

Taxon
Vigna mungoVigna mungot0
Treatment
water stress at the pod formation stagee0
Outcome
Chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
most affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll concentration was the most affected parameter by water stress at the pod formation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vigna mungo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–96 · show in text ↑

Funneliformis mosseae · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

drought · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 3 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: protein · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium · quality: protein · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · soil: biology · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mycorrhiza · soil: biology · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.