Paper · 2016 · Journal of Rural and Development

Comparative study of tissue culture response of some selected basmati rice cultivars of Pakistan

Khalid Mehmood; Muhammad Arshad; Shaukat Ali; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to select the best tissue culture responsive basmati rice cultivar among Basmati 370, Basmati 385, Super basmati and Shaheen basmati. N6 and MS media having four levels of 2, 4-D (1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 mg/l) and three levels of agar (4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 g/l) were used in order to evaluate the most appropriate level required for calli formation. Basmati 370 showed the best response as compared to other cultivars on both MS and N6 media. The most cultivars behaved well for callus induction at N6 media, 5.0 g/l agar and 2.0-2.5 mg/l 2, 4-D. Basmati 370 showed callus formation; 74.0-85.07%, Super basmati showed 65.5-75.17%, Basmati 380 showed 72-79% and Shaheen basmati showed 53.0-67.87% callus formation. For regeneration, various treatments (0.5/2.0, 1.0/4.0, 1.5/5.0 mg/l) of NAA/BAP were used. Super basmati exhibited the best response for regeneration (58.33%) at 1.0/5.0 NAA/BAP. Based on our findings, Super basmati was found to be the best tissue culture responsive cultivar. These results will be helpful in unveiling many aspects of callus induction and regeneration and have potential use in genetic improvement of rice by employing various techniques of genetic transformation including Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and gene gun method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basmati 370 had the best tissue culture response on MS and N6 media.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
Basmati 370e0
Treatment
MS and N6 mediae0
Outcome
best responsee0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“Basmati 370 showed the best response as compared to other cultivars on both MS and N6 media.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–461 · show in text ↑
t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most cultivars had good callus induction on N6 medium with 5.0 g/l agar and 2.0-2.5 mg/l 2, 4-D.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Treatment
N6 media, 5.0 g/l agar and 2.0-2.5 mg/l 2, 4-De0
Outcome
callus inductione0
Direction
behaved welle0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The most cultivars behaved well for callus induction at N6 media, 5.0 g/l agar and 2.0-2.5 mg/l 2, 4-D.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–565 · show in text ↑
t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basmati 370 had 74.0-85.07% callus formation.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
Basmati 370e0
Outcome
callus formatione0
Value
74.0-85.07%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Basmati 370 showed callus formation; 74.0-85.07%, Super basmati showed 65.5-75.17%, Basmati 380 showed 72-79% and Shaheen basmati showed 53.0-67.87% callus formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super basmati had 65.5-75.17% callus formation.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
Super basmatie0
Outcome
callus formatione0
Value
65.5-75.17%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Basmati 370 showed callus formation; 74.0-85.07%, Super basmati showed 65.5-75.17%, Basmati 380 showed 72-79% and Shaheen basmati showed 53.0-67.87% callus formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basmati 380 had 72-79% callus formation.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
Basmati 380e0
Outcome
callus formatione0
Value
72-79%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Basmati 370 showed callus formation; 74.0-85.07%, Super basmati showed 65.5-75.17%, Basmati 380 showed 72-79% and Shaheen basmati showed 53.0-67.87% callus formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shaheen basmati had 53.0-67.87% callus formation.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
Shaheen basmatie0
Outcome
callus formatione0
Value
53.0-67.87%e0

Verbatim

e0

“Basmati 370 showed callus formation; 74.0-85.07%, Super basmati showed 65.5-75.17%, Basmati 380 showed 72-79% and Shaheen basmati showed 53.0-67.87% callus formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–732 · show in text ↑
t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Super basmati had the best regeneration response, 58.33%, at 1.0/5.0 NAA/BAP.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
Super basmatie0
Treatment
1.0/5.0 NAA/BAPe0
Outcome
regeneratione0
Direction
beste0
Value
58.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Super basmati exhibited the best response for regeneration (58.33%) at 1.0/5.0 NAA/BAP.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered Super basmati the best tissue culture responsive cultivar.

Taxon
basmati ricet0
Material
Super basmatie0
Outcome
best tissue culture responsive cultivare0

Verbatim

e0

“Based on our findings, Super basmati was found to be the best tissue culture responsive cultivar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1010 · show in text ↑
t0

“basmati rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

71 papers: 65 positive, 6 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

72 papers: 68 positive, 4 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

agar · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

2,4-D · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

107 papers: 102 positive, 5 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

in vitro · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

165 papers: 140 positive, 25 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

161 papers more in this group

See all 165 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.