Abstract
Plant tissue culture technology offers a solution for meeting the increasing commercial demand on economically important plants such as rice, a widespread dietary staple. However, significant genotype-specific morphogenetic responses constitute a considerable on rice regeneration in plant biotechnology contexts. Aside from genotype dependency, the components of the nutrient media including gelling agents have an important impact on regeneration efficiency. The current study explores the effect of different gelling agents on various stages of rice regeneration in two Egyptian rice cultivars-Sakha104 and Giza178. Media solidified with varying concentrations of a variety of gelling agents (agar, bacto agar, gelrite and phytagel) were tested for their impact on the frequency of callus induction, shoot regeneration and rooting. The results indicated gellan gum (gelrite and phytagel) was superior to agar products (agar and bacto agar) for callus induction. By contrast, no significant differences were found between different gelling agents for shoot regeneration. Gellan gum and media solidified with bacto agar were found to lead to significantly higher root regeneration than agar. The Sakha104 cultivar showed better responses than Giza 178 for callus induction and similar performance to the Giza 178 cultivar for root regeneration irrespective of the gelling agent. This work provides insights into the impact of different gelling agents on the morphogenetic response of two rice cultivars and can be used to help maximize the frequency of rice regeneration.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Gellan gum (gelrite and phytagel) was superior to agar products for callus induction in rice.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Material
- Sakha104 and Giza178e0
- Treatment
- gellan gum (gelrite and phytagel)e1
- Outcome
- callus inductione1
- Direction
- superiore1
- Comparator
- agar products (agar and bacto agar)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The current study explores the effect of different gelling agents on various stages of rice regeneration in two Egyptian rice cultivars-Sakha104 and Giza178”
e1“The results indicated gellan gum (gelrite and phytagel) was superior to agar products (agar and bacto agar) for callus induction”
Claim · model-written summary
No significant differences were found between gelling agents for shoot regeneration in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- different gelling agentse2
- Outcome
- shoot regeneratione2
- Direction
- no significant differencese2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The current study explores the effect of different gelling agents on various stages of rice regeneration in two Egyptian rice cultivars-Sakha104 and Giza178”
e2“no significant differences were found between different gelling agents for shoot regeneration”
Claim · model-written summary
Gellan gum led to significantly higher root regeneration than agar in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Material
- Sakha104 and Giza178e0
- Treatment
- Gellan gume3
- Outcome
- root regeneratione3
- Direction
- significantly highere3
- Comparator
- agare3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The current study explores the effect of different gelling agents on various stages of rice regeneration in two Egyptian rice cultivars-Sakha104 and Giza178”
e3“Gellan gum and media solidified with bacto agar were found to lead to significantly higher root regeneration than agar”
Claim · model-written summary
Media solidified with bacto agar led to significantly higher root regeneration than agar in rice.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Material
- Sakha104 and Giza178e0
- Treatment
- media solidified with bacto agare3
- Outcome
- root regeneratione3
- Direction
- significantly highere3
- Comparator
- agare3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The current study explores the effect of different gelling agents on various stages of rice regeneration in two Egyptian rice cultivars-Sakha104 and Giza178”
e3“Gellan gum and media solidified with bacto agar were found to lead to significantly higher root regeneration than agar”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar Sakha104 showed better callus induction responses than Giza 178.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Material
- Sakha104e4
- Outcome
- callus inductione4
- Direction
- better responsese4
- Comparator
- Giza 178e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The current study explores the effect of different gelling agents on various stages of rice regeneration in two Egyptian rice cultivars-Sakha104 and Giza178”
e4“The Sakha104 cultivar showed better responses than Giza 178 for callus induction”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar Sakha104 showed similar root regeneration performance to Giza 178.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Outcome
- root regeneratione5
- Direction
- similar performancee5
- Comparator
- Giza 178e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The current study explores the effect of different gelling agents on various stages of rice regeneration in two Egyptian rice cultivars-Sakha104 and Giza178”
e5“similar performance to the Giza 178 cultivar for root regeneration”
The same questions in other papers
agar · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →in vitro · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
161 papers more in this group
See all 165 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.