Paper · 2015 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Integrated pest management of maize stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) in maize crop and its impact on yield

Irfan Ullah Khan; Muhammad Nawaz; Fazal Said; et al.

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Two years studies on integrated pest management of maize stem borer, Chilo parttellus in maize and its impact on yield were conducted during the crop seasons 2008 and 2009 at the Cereal Crops Research Institute, Pirsabak, Nowshera. In these trials, different control methods viz. cultural, mechanical, biological and chemical alone and in combination of all as IPM (Integrated Pest Management) as compared to control conditions were applied for the control of maize stem borer. The results showed that all the control methods were found significantly effective in reducing maize stem borer infestation in maize crop. Maize stem borer infestation was significantly lower in IPM treatment with 2.32% and 2.77% followed by chemical 3.68% and 3.47% as compared to control 12.92% and 7.70% during 2008 and 2009, respectively. The highest grain yield was obtained from plots treated with IPM 8.64 ton/ha and 5.81 ton/ha as compared to control 6.23 ton/ha and 3.63 ton/ha during 2008 and 2009 respectively. It is concluded that IPM is one of the best method for control of maize stem borer and obtaining the highest yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All control methods significantly reduced maize stem borer infestation compared with control conditions.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
cultural, mechanical, biological and chemicale2
Interactor
maize stem borere0pest
Outcome
maize stem borer infestatione1
Direction
reducinge1
Comparator
control conditionse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize stem borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“maize stem borer, Chilo parttellus in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–94 · show in text ↑
e1

“all the control methods were found significantly effective in reducing maize stem borer infestation in maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–615 · show in text ↑
e2

“control methods viz. cultural, mechanical, biological and chemical alone and in combination of all as IPM (Integrated Pest Management) as compared to control conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

IPM significantly lowered maize stem borer infestation compared with control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
IPM treatmente3
Interactor
maize stem borere0pest
Outcome
Maize stem borer infestatione3
Direction
lowere3
Value
2.32% and 2.77%e3
Qualifier
12.92% and 7.70%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize stem borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“maize stem borer, Chilo parttellus in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maize stem borer infestation was significantly lower in IPM treatment with 2.32% and 2.77% followed by chemical 3.68% and 3.47% as compared to control 12.92% and 7.70% during 2008 and 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemical control lowered maize stem borer infestation compared with control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chemicale3
Interactor
maize stem borere0pest
Outcome
Maize stem borer infestatione3
Direction
lowerinferrede3
Value
3.68% and 3.47%e3
Comparator
controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize stem borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“maize stem borer, Chilo parttellus in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–94 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maize stem borer infestation was significantly lower in IPM treatment with 2.32% and 2.77% followed by chemical 3.68% and 3.47% as compared to control 12.92% and 7.70% during 2008 and 2009”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–805 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots treated with IPM gave the highest grain yield, 8.64 and 5.81 ton/ha.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
IPMe4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
higheste4
Value
8.64 ton/ha and 5.81 ton/hae4
Qualifier
6.23 ton/ha and 3.63 ton/hae4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize stem borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–46 · show in text ↑
e4

“The highest grain yield was obtained from plots treated with IPM 8.64 ton/ha and 5.81 ton/ha as compared to control 6.23 ton/ha and 3.63 ton/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–964 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

IPM is one of the best methods for controlling maize stem borer.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
one of the best method for control of maize stem borere5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“maize stem borer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–46 · show in text ↑
e5

“IPM is one of the best method for control of maize stem borer and obtaining the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1114 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

ipm · pest · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

ipm · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.