Abstract
The objective of the present study was to determine yield performance and farmers' preference to the Lamuru composite corn variety planted with the application of corn Integrated Crop Management (ICM) and non Integrated Crop Management (non-ICM). The study was conducted in Kadumadang Village of Pandeglang Regency on a dry land agro-ecosystem in February-May 2020. The composite corn variety used was the Lamuru variety. Data was gathered using direct observation of agronomic performance and production with 10 replications. The agronomic data observed were plant height, number of leaves, stem diameter, 50% flowering age, cob length, cob diameter, number of rows per cob, 100 grains weight, stover weight, cob weight and dry seeds weight. Interviews and questionnaires were conducted to determine farmers' preference to the Lamuru variety performance. Quantitative data was analyzed statistically and qualitative data was analyzed descriptively. From the result, the growth of corn ICM was higher than non-ICM. It resulted in a higher productivity of corn ICM (9.27 t/ha) compared to non-ICM (6.68 t/ha) significantly. Furthermore, farmers gave a fairly high response to the performance of Lamuru variety through the application of corn ICM and non-ICM, respectively at 79.95% and 72.52%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
ICM corn growth was higher than non-ICM growth.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“From the result, the growth of corn ICM was higher than non-ICM.”
Claim · model-written summary
ICM corn productivity was significantly higher, 9.27 versus 6.68 t/ha.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0 - Treatment
- ICMe0
- Outcome
- productivitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 9.27 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 6.68 t/hae0
- Comparator
- non-ICMe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It resulted in a higher productivity of corn ICM (9.27 t/ha) compared to non-ICM (6.68 t/ha) significantly.”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmers rated Lamuru with ICM at 79.95%.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Material
- Lamurue0
- Treatment
- ICMe0
- Outcome
- farmers gave a fairly high responsee0
- Value
- 79.95%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Furthermore, farmers gave a fairly high response to the performance of Lamuru variety through the application of corn ICM and non-ICM, respectively at 79.95% and 72.52%.”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmers rated Lamuru without ICM at 72.52%.
- Taxon
- cornZea mays subsp. mayse0
- Material
- Lamurue0
- Treatment
- non-ICMe0
- Outcome
- farmers gave a fairly high responsee0
- Value
- 72.52%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Furthermore, farmers gave a fairly high response to the performance of Lamuru variety through the application of corn ICM and non-ICM, respectively at 79.95% and 72.52%.”
The same questions in other papers
ipm · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
14 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.