Paper · 2023 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Agronomic and economic evaluation of sowing methods and mulching for an irrigated wheat (Triticum aestivum) in north-west Punjab

RANVIR SINGH; AMARINDER SINGH; AMANPREET SINGH; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter season of 2017–18 at Khalsa College, Amritsar, to study the effect of the method of sowing and different mulch on yield and economics of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) levels in the northwest Punjab region. Wheat was sown on raised beds recorded about 10–12% higher grain yield over zero-till and flat sowing methods. Straw mulch at 4.5 t/ha resulted significant effect on grain yield in wheat. The net returns were more in bed planting and higher mulch levels compared with the other treatments. Straw mulch reduced the maximum soil temperature at seed depth (5 cm) by about 3.7oC compared to the no mulch. During the wheat emergence, raised beds recorded 2.4o C higher soil temperature at 7–8 cm soil depth compared to the flat and zero-till treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat sown on raised beds had about 10–12% higher grain yield than zero-till and flat sowing.

Treatment
raised bedse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
10–12%e0
Comparator
zero-till and flat sowing methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat was sown on raised beds recorded about 10–12% higher grain yield over zero-till and flat sowing methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 256–365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch at 4.5 t/ha had a significant effect on wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Straw mulch at 4.5 t/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Straw mulch at 4.5 t/ha resulted significant effect on grain yield in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns of wheat were higher under bed planting than under the other treatments.

Treatment
bed plantinge0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“irrigated wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The net returns were more in bed planting and higher mulch levels compared with the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net returns of wheat were higher at higher mulch levels than under the other treatments.

Treatment
higher mulch levelse0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“irrigated wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“The net returns were more in bed planting and higher mulch levels compared with the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw mulch reduced the maximum soil temperature at seed depth (5 cm) by about 3.7oC compared with no mulch in wheat.

Treatment
Straw mulche0
Outcome
maximum soil temperature at seed depth (5 cm)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
3.7oCe0
Comparator
the no mulche0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“irrigated wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Straw mulch reduced the maximum soil temperature at seed depth (5 cm) by about 3.7oC compared to the no mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During wheat emergence raised beds recorded 2.4o C higher soil temperature at 7–8 cm depth than flat and zero-till treatments.

Treatment
raised bedse0
Outcome
soil temperature at 7–8 cm soil depthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.4o Ce0
Comparator
the flat and zero-till treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the wheat emergence, raised beds recorded 2.4o C higher soil temperature at 7–8 cm soil depth compared to the flat and zero-till treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–803 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

149 papers: 137 positive, 12 negative or no effect

136 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

145 papers more in this group

See all 149 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.