Paper · 2021 · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)

Yield and Quality of First-Year Corn Silage Following Alfalfa Stand Termination as Affected by Tillage, Herbicide, and Nitrogen Fertilizer

Clark, Jason Daniel

10
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine)-containing herbicides are a common and highly effective method to terminate alfalfa (Medicago sativa) stands. With the development and use of glyphosate-resistant (Roundup Ready®) alfalfa, this tool is no longer an option. The purpose of this research was to determine the optimal strategy to rotate from glyphosate-resistant alfalfa into silage corn (Zea mays). Studies were conducted in 2012 and 2013 at sites near Cache Junction and Cornish, Utah to determine the effect of tillage type and timing [fall conventional till (FCT), spring conventional till (SCT), fall strip-till (FST), spring strip-till (SST), and no-till (NT)], 2,4-D plus dicamba herbicide timing (fall, spring, in-crop, and a control), and N rate (0, 56, 112, and 224 kg N ha-1) on soil penetration resistance (PR), alfalfa re-growth, and corn emergence rate index (ERI), silage yield, quality, and economic return. The fall, spring, and in-crop herbicide timings across all tillage treatments reduced alfalfa stem count and biomass by at least 95% and 98%, respectively. Tillage reduced PR compared to NT to or near the depth of tillage. The ERI was significantly higher under FCT, SCT, and SST and when herbicides were applied in fall or spring. Silage yield, quality, and economic return were the highest when spring herbicide timing was used with all tillage types and timings and the fall herbicide timing under conventional tillage. Increasing N rates increased crude protein, milk ha-1, and dry matter yield. However, optimal yield and quality can be obtained with no additional N fertilizer. First-year silage corn yield, quality, and economic return can be optimized under fall or spring conventional till, strip-till, and no-till at the spring herbicide timing along with the fall herbicide timing for conventional tillage with no additional N fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide applications in fall, spring and in crop reduced alfalfa stem count by at least 95%.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
fall, spring, and in-crop herbicide timingse0
Outcome
alfalfa stem counte0
Direction
reducede0
Value
95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fall, spring, and in-crop herbicide timings across all tillage treatments reduced alfalfa stem count and biomass by at least 95% and 98%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same herbicide timings reduced alfalfa biomass by at least 98%.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
fall, spring, and in-crop herbicide timingse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The fall, spring, and in-crop herbicide timings across all tillage treatments reduced alfalfa stem count and biomass by at least 95% and 98%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillage reduced soil penetration resistance relative to no till to near tillage depth.

Treatment
Tillagee0
Outcome
PRe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
to or near the depth of tillagee0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tillage reduced PR compared to NT to or near the depth of tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn emergence rate index was significantly higher with FCT, SCT and SST.

Treatment
FCT, SCT, and SSTe0
Outcome
ERIe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ERI was significantly higher under FCT, SCT, and SST and when herbicides were applied in fall or spring.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall or spring herbicide applications significantly increased corn emergence rate index.

Treatment
herbicides were applied in fall or springe0
Outcome
ERIe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ERI was significantly higher under FCT, SCT, and SST and when herbicides were applied in fall or spring.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring herbicide timing gave the highest silage yield across tillage treatments.

Treatment
spring herbicide timinge0
Outcome
Silage yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
with all tillage types and timingse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silage yield, quality, and economic return were the highest when spring herbicide timing was used with all tillage types and timings and the fall herbicide timing under conventional tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring herbicide timing gave the highest silage quality and economic return across tillage treatments.

Treatment
spring herbicide timinge0
Outcome
quality, and economic returne0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
with all tillage types and timingse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silage yield, quality, and economic return were the highest when spring herbicide timing was used with all tillage types and timings and the fall herbicide timing under conventional tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall herbicide timing under conventional tillage gave the highest silage yield, quality and economic return.

Treatment
fall herbicide timing under conventional tillagee0
Outcome
Silage yield, quality, and economic returne0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Silage yield, quality, and economic return were the highest when spring herbicide timing was used with all tillage types and timings and the fall herbicide timing under conventional tillage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rates increased crude protein, milk per hectare and dry matter yield.

Treatment
N ratese0
Outcome
crude protein, milk ha-1, and dry matter yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing N rates increased crude protein, milk ha-1, and dry matter yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimal silage yield and quality could be obtained without added nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment
no additional N fertilizere0
Outcome
optimal yield and qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, optimal yield and quality can be obtained with no additional N fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1610 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–36 · show in text ↑

herbicide · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · organism · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 12 positive, 7 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

herbicide · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 10 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

tillage · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 33 positive, 21 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

herbicide · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 86 positive, 57 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

139 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

181 papers: 164 positive, 17 negative or no effect

163 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

177 papers more in this group

See all 181 papers →

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.