Paper · 1987 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Seed Zone Soil Temperature and Early Corn Growth with Three Conservation Tillage Systems

A. M. Al‐Darby; B. Lowery

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
84
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Detailed data are needed to quantify the effect of conservation tillage (CT) on corn ( Zea mays L.) emergence and early growth in the Northern Corn Belt. Corn was grown using three CT systems: till‐plant (TP), chisel (CH), and no‐till (NT) and conventional moldboard plow (CN) on a Griswold silt loam soil (Typic Argiudoll) during the 1982 to 1984 growing seasons. Soil temperature at the seed depth (5 cm) was measured hourly. Daily means and cumulative growing degree days (GDD) based on seed zone temperatures were calculated. Corn emergence was monitored. Leaf area and dry matter per hectare were measured at different growth stages. Relative growth rates (RGR) were calculated from daily measured plant heights. Soil temperature at the 5‐cm depth ranked CN > TP > CH > NT. Initial corn emergence rates with the NT system were depressed compared to CN; the emergence rate ranked CN > TP = CH > NT. However, time to 100% emergence was delayed by 8, 2 to 3, and 2 d for NT compared to CN in 1982, 1983, and 1984, respectively. All tillage systems started to emerge at 40 to 55 GDD and reached a maximum emergence at 70 to 80 GDD. During the first 5 weeks after emergence, corn growth parameters (plant height, leaf area, dry matter) of NT were consistently lower, and in some cases significantly lower than CN. These growth parameters were highly correlated with GDD. The RGR fluctuated in the same manner as the daily 5‐cm soil temperature during the first 5 weeks after emergence. The correlation coefficients of log RGR vs. daily mean soil temperatures were highly significant and followed the soil temperature trends. Thus, the lower soil temperature associated with CT systems, especially NT, is one of the main factors affecting emergence and seedling growth and development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-depth soil temperature ranked conventional plowing highest and no-till lowest.

Outcome
Soil temperature at the 5‐cm depthe0
Direction
CN > TP > CH > NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil temperature at the 5‐cm depth ranked CN > TP > CH > NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till depressed initial corn emergence relative to conventional plowing; emergence ranked CN > TP = CH > NT.

Treatment
NT systeme0
Outcome
corn emergence ratese0
Direction
depressede0
Comparator
CNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Initial corn emergence rates with the NT system were depressed compared to CN; the emergence rate ranked CN > TP = CH > NT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–910 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till delayed complete corn emergence by 8 days relative to conventional plowing in 1982.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
time to 100% emergencee0
Direction
delayede0
Value
8e0
Qualifier
1982e0
Comparator
CNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“time to 100% emergence was delayed by 8, 2 to 3, and 2 d for NT compared to CN in 1982, 1983, and 1984, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till delayed complete corn emergence by 2 to 3 days relative to conventional plowing in 1983.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
time to 100% emergencee0
Direction
delayede0
Value
2 to 3e0
Qualifier
1983e0
Comparator
CNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“time to 100% emergence was delayed by 8, 2 to 3, and 2 d for NT compared to CN in 1982, 1983, and 1984, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till delayed complete corn emergence by 2 days relative to conventional plowing in 1984.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
time to 100% emergencee0
Direction
delayede0
Value
2 de0
Qualifier
1984e0
Comparator
CNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“time to 100% emergence was delayed by 8, 2 to 3, and 2 d for NT compared to CN in 1982, 1983, and 1984, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tillage systems began emergence at 40 to 55 growing degree days.

Outcome
started to emergee0
Value
40 to 55 GDDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All tillage systems started to emerge at 40 to 55 GDD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1092 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tillage systems reached maximum emergence at 70 to 80 growing degree days.

Outcome
maximum emergencee0
Value
70 to 80 GDDe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reached a maximum emergence at 70 to 80 GDD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-till corn height, leaf area and dry matter were consistently lower than under conventional plowing for five weeks after emergence.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
plant height, leaf area, dry mattere0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
During the first 5 weeks after emergencee0
Comparator
CNe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the first 5 weeks after emergence, corn growth parameters (plant height, leaf area, dry matter) of NT were consistently lower, and in some cases significantly lower than CN”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1321 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn growth parameters were highly correlated with growing degree days.

Outcome
growth parameterse0
Qualifier
highly correlated with GDDe0
Setting
GDDe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These growth parameters were highly correlated with GDD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1323–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate fluctuated with daily 5-cm soil temperature during the first five weeks after emergence.

Outcome
RGRe0
Qualifier
during the first 5 weeks after emergencee0
Setting
daily 5‐cm soil temperaturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RGR fluctuated in the same manner as the daily 5‐cm soil temperature during the first 5 weeks after emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1493 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The correlations of log relative growth rate with daily mean soil temperatures were highly significant and followed soil-temperature trends.

Outcome
correlation coefficients of log RGR vs. daily mean soil temperaturese0
Setting
daily mean soil temperaturese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The correlation coefficients of log RGR vs. daily mean soil temperatures were highly significant and followed the soil temperature trends”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1632 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower soil temperature under conservation tillage, especially no-till, was identified as a main factor affecting corn emergence and seedling growth.

Treatment
CT systemse0
Outcome
emergence and seedling growth and developmente0
Qualifier
lower soil temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the lower soil temperature associated with CT systems, especially NT, is one of the main factors affecting emergence and seedling growth and development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1792 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–48 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.