Paper · 2004 · Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems

EFFECT OF INDIGENOUS PLANT EXTRACTS ON THE INCIDENCE OF MUSTARD APHID, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) ON CABBAGE

Kuldeep Singh; M. P. Singh; Arup Kumar Sarma

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Comparative laboratory and field efficacy of certain indigenous plant extracts were tested against Mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on cabbage var. ‘Pride of India’. Among the various aqueous extracts evaluated in the laboratory, seven plant extracts from Melia azedarach, Jatropha gossypifolia, Agerarnm couyzoides, Lantana camara, Murraya kaenigii, Acorus calamus and Artemisia nilagirica sprayed at 5% concentration were found to be significantly superior to the rest in reducing the aphid population. Thus, field efficacy of ether extract of these seven plant species each at 0.5% concentration was tested with Nimbecidine and Dichlorvos at 0.3% and 0.05% concentrations, respectively. The population of L. erysimi was significantly different among the treatments at all the time intervals under observation. But, Dichlorvos gave the best control with a record of 4.67 aphids/plant as against 31.67 aphids/plant in untreated control. Dichlorvos was closely followed by Nimbecidine with a record of 7.84 aphids/plant. Among the various ether extracts, the maximum protection was provided by M. azeilarach with minimum aphid population of 11.25 per plant which was at par with the population recorded on the plots treated with J. gossypifolia, A. rzilagirica, A. conyzoides, and M. koenigii. The maximum yield (18.83 t/ha) was recorded in the plots treated with Dichlorvos as against untreated control (12.25 t/ha), followed by Nimbecidine(17.17 t/ha), M. azedarach1(15.83 t/ha) and J. gossypifolia (15.00 t/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven listed 5% aqueous plant extracts significantly reduced aphids relative to other extracts.

Treatment
seven plant extractse0
Interactor
aphide0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
the reste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“seven plant extracts from Melia azedarach, Jatropha gossypifolia, Agerarnm couyzoides, Lantana camara, Murraya kaenigii, Acorus calamus and Artemisia nilagirica sprayed at 5% concentration were found to be significantly superior to the rest in reducing the aphid population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–509 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field aphid populations differed significantly among treatments.

Interactor
L. erysimiLipaphis erysimie0pest
Outcome
population of L. erysimie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“The population of L. erysimi was significantly different among the treatments at all the time intervals under observation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dichlorvos gave best aphid control at 4.67 per plant versus 31.67 in untreated plots.

Treatment
Dichlorvose0
Interactor
Lipaphis erysimiLipaphis erysimit0pest
Outcome
aphids/plante0
Direction
best controle0
Value
4.67 aphids/plante0
Qualifier
31.67 aphids/plante0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) ON CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dichlorvos gave the best control with a record of 4.67 aphids/plant as against 31.67 aphids/plant in untreated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nimbecidine followed Dichlorvos with 7.84 aphids per plant.

Treatment
Nimbecidinee0
Interactor
Lipaphis erysimiLipaphis erysimit0pest
Outcome
aphids/plante0
Direction
closely followede0
Value
7.84 aphids/plante0
Comparator
Dichlorvose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) ON CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dichlorvos was closely followed by Nimbecidine with a record of 7.84 aphids/plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. azeilarach ether extract gave maximum protection with 11.25 aphids per plant.

Treatment
M. azeilarache0
Interactor
Lipaphis erysimiLipaphis erysimit0pest
Outcome
aphid populatione0
Direction
minimume0
Value
11.25 per plante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) ON CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum protection was provided by M. azeilarach with minimum aphid population of 11.25 per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1159 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. azeilarach aphid counts were at par with four other extracts.

Interactor
Lipaphis erysimiLipaphis erysimit0pest
Outcome
populatione0
Direction
at pare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) ON CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“at par with the population recorded on the plots treated with J. gossypifolia, A. rzilagirica, A. conyzoides, and M. koenigii.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1296 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dichlorvos gave maximum cabbage yield of 18.83 t/ha.

Treatment
Dichlorvose0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
18.83 t/hae0
Qualifier
12.25 t/hae0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum yield (18.83 t/ha) was recorded in the plots treated with Dichlorvos as against untreated control (12.25 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1419 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nimbecidine gave cabbage yield of 17.17 t/ha.

Treatment
Nimbecidinee0
Outcome
yielde1
Value
17.17 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“followed by Nimbecidine(17.17 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1421–1456 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. azedarach1 gave cabbage yield of 15.83 t/ha.

Treatment
M. azedarach1e0
Outcome
yielde1
Value
15.83 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“M. azedarach1(15.83 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1483 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

J. gossypifolia gave cabbage yield of 15.00 t/ha.

Treatment
J. gossypifoliae0
Outcome
yielde1
Value
15.00 t/hae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“CABBAGE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–106 · show in text ↑
e0

“J. gossypifolia (15.00 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1516 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1314 · show in text ↑

dichlorvos · Lipaphis erysimi · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Melia azedarach · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

dichlorvos · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

botanical · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 65 positive, 13 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.