Paper · 2001 · International pest control/International Pest Control

Evaluation of certain new insecticides against the aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on cabbage.

M. Sreekanth; T. Ramesh Babu

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The efficacy of imidacloprid, profenofos, silafluofen, deltamethrin + triazophos, diafenthiuron, monocrotophos and dichlorvos against the aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on cabbage under field conditions was studied during Rabi, 1997-98. Imidacloprid 0.02% spray was adjudged as the most effective treatment in suppressing the aphid population closely followed by profenofos 0.05% and monocrotophos 0.05% by recording 99.06%, 98.31% and 87.95%, suppression respectively. Imidacloprid 0.008% root dip (43.32%), followed by diafenthiuron (12.81%) were found to be ineffective. An enhanced aphid population over control (-34%) was evident with silafluofen 0.02%. Dichlorvos 0.1% was found to be effective initially.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 0.02% spray was the most effective treatment for suppressing the aphid population, with 99.06% suppression.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 0.02% spraye0
Interactor
Lipaphis erysimiLipaphis erysimie1pest
Outcome
suppressing the aphid populatione0
Direction
suppressione0
Value
99.06%e0
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid 0.02% spray was adjudged as the most effective treatment in suppressing the aphid population closely followed by profenofos 0.05% and monocrotophos 0.05% by recording 99.06%, 98.31% and 87.95%, suppression respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–468 · show in text ↑
e1

“against the aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on cabbage under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenofos 0.05% suppressed the aphid population, with 98.31% suppression.

Treatment
profenofos 0.05%e0
Interactor
Lipaphis erysimiLipaphis erysimie1pest
Outcome
suppressing the aphid populatione0
Direction
suppressione0
Value
98.31%e0
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid 0.02% spray was adjudged as the most effective treatment in suppressing the aphid population closely followed by profenofos 0.05% and monocrotophos 0.05% by recording 99.06%, 98.31% and 87.95%, suppression respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–468 · show in text ↑
e1

“against the aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on cabbage under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monocrotophos 0.05% suppressed the aphid population, with 87.95% suppression.

Treatment
monocrotophos 0.05%e0
Interactor
Lipaphis erysimiLipaphis erysimie1pest
Outcome
suppressing the aphid populatione0
Direction
suppressione0
Value
87.95%e0
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imidacloprid 0.02% spray was adjudged as the most effective treatment in suppressing the aphid population closely followed by profenofos 0.05% and monocrotophos 0.05% by recording 99.06%, 98.31% and 87.95%, suppression respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–468 · show in text ↑
e1

“against the aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on cabbage under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid 0.008% root dip was ineffective, with 43.32% suppression.

Treatment
Imidacloprid 0.008% root dipe2
Interactor
Lipaphis erysimiLipaphis erysimie1pest
Outcome
to be ineffectivee2
Value
43.32%e2
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“against the aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on cabbage under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–202 · show in text ↑
e2

“Imidacloprid 0.008% root dip (43.32%), followed by diafenthiuron (12.81%) were found to be ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Diafenthiuron was ineffective, with 12.81% suppression.

Treatment
diafenthiurone2
Interactor
Lipaphis erysimiLipaphis erysimie1pest
Outcome
to be ineffectivee2
Value
12.81%e2
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“against the aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on cabbage under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–202 · show in text ↑
e2

“Imidacloprid 0.008% root dip (43.32%), followed by diafenthiuron (12.81%) were found to be ineffective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–572 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silafluofen 0.02% enhanced the aphid population over control by 34%.

Treatment
silafluofen 0.02%e3
Interactor
Lipaphis erysimiLipaphis erysimie1pest
Outcome
aphid populatione3
Direction
enhancede3
Value
-34%e3
Comparator
controle3
Setting
field conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“against the aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on cabbage under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–202 · show in text ↑
e3

“An enhanced aphid population over control (-34%) was evident with silafluofen 0.02%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–657 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dichlorvos 0.1% was effective initially.

Treatment
Dichlorvos 0.1%e4
Interactor
Lipaphis erysimiLipaphis erysimie1pest
Outcome
to be effective initiallye4
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lipaphis erysimi
Lipaphis erysimi · InteractorAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“against the aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kalt.) on cabbage under field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–202 · show in text ↑
e4

“Dichlorvos 0.1% was found to be effective initially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–710 · show in text ↑

monocrotophos · Lipaphis erysimi · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

dichlorvos · Lipaphis erysimi · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

imidacloprid · Lipaphis erysimi · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · Lipaphis erysimi · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.