Paper · 2017 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Influence of the root endophyte Piriformospora indica on the plant water relations, gas exchange and growth of Chenopodium quinoa at limited water availability

S. Hussin; W. Khalifa; N. Geissler; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate the ability of Piriformospora indica to colonize the root of Chenopodium quinoa and to verify whether this endosymbiont can improve the growth, performance and drought resistance of this species. The study delivered, for the first time, evidence for successful colonization of P. indica in quinoa. Hence, pot experiment was conducted in the greenhouse, where inoculated and non‐inoculated plants were subjected to ample (40%–50% WHC ) and deficit (15%–20% WHC ) irrigation treatments. Drought adversely influenced the plant growth, leading to decline the total plant biomass by 74%. This was linked to an impaired photosynthetic activity (caused by lower g s and C i /C a ratio; stomatal limitation of photosynthesis) and a higher risk of ROS production (enhanced ETR /A gross ratio). P. indica colonization improved quinoa plant growth, with total biomass increased by 8% (controls) and 76% (drought‐stressed plants), confirming the growth‐promoting activity of P. indica . Fungal colonization seems to diminish drought‐induced growth hindrance, likely, through an improved water balance, reflected by the higher leaf ψ w and g s . Additionally, stomatal limitation of photosynthesis was alleviated (indicated by enhanced C i /C a ratio and A net ), so that the threat of oxidative stress was minimized (decreased ETR /A gross ). These results infer that symbiosis with P. indica could negate some of the detrimental effects of drought on quinoa growth, a highly desired feature, in particular at low water availability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. indica successfully colonized quinoa roots.

Interactor
P. indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
successful colonizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“successful colonization of P. indica in quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced total quinoa biomass by 74%.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
Droughte0
Outcome
total plant biomasse0
Direction
declinee0
Value
74%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought adversely influenced the plant growth, leading to decline the total plant biomass by 74%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought impaired photosynthetic activity in quinoa.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
Droughte1
Outcome
photosynthetic activitye0
Direction
impairede0
Qualifier
lower g s and C i /C a ratioe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This was linked to an impaired photosynthetic activity (caused by lower g s and C i /C a ratio; stomatal limitation of photosynthesis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 621–755 · show in text ↑
e1

“Drought adversely influenced the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–568 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought raised the ETR /A gross ratio in quinoa, indicating greater ROS risk.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
limited water availabilityt0
Outcome
ETR /A gross ratioe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher risk of ROS production (enhanced ETR /A gross ratio)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–821 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chenopodium quinoa at limited water availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. indica colonization increased quinoa biomass by 8% in controls.

Treatment
P. indica colonizatione0
Interactor
P. indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8%e0
Qualifier
controlse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. indica colonization improved quinoa plant growth, with total biomass increased by 8% (controls) and 76% (drought‐stressed plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. indica colonization increased quinoa biomass by 76% under drought.

Treatment
P. indica colonizatione0
Interactor
P. indicaSerendipita indicae0symbiont
Outcome
total biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
76%e0
Qualifier
drought‐stressed plantse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P. indica colonization improved quinoa plant growth, with total biomass increased by 8% (controls) and 76% (drought‐stressed plants)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–955 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal colonization increased leaf water potential and stomatal conductance under drought.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
Fungal colonizatione0
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicat0symbiont
Outcome
leaf ψ w and g se0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fungal colonization seems to diminish drought‐induced growth hindrance, likely, through an improved water balance, reflected by the higher leaf ψ w and g s .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“Piriformospora indica on the plant water relations, gas exchange and growth of Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal colonization alleviated stomatal limitation of photosynthesis, with enhanced C i /C a ratio and A net .

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
Piriformospora indicat0
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicat0symbiont
Outcome
C i /C a ratio and A nete0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal limitation of photosynthesis was alleviated (indicated by enhanced C i /C a ratio and A net )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Piriformospora indica on the plant water relations, gas exchange and growth of Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal colonization decreased ETR /A gross and minimized oxidative stress threat.

Taxon
Chenopodium quinoaChenopodium quinoat0
Treatment
Piriformospora indicat0
Interactor
Piriformospora indicaSerendipita indicat0symbiont
Outcome
ETR /A grosse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the threat of oxidative stress was minimized (decreased ETR /A gross )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“Piriformospora indica on the plant water relations, gas exchange and growth of Chenopodium quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–129 · show in text ↑

infection · growth · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · growth · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.