Paper · 2015 · Chilean journal of agricultural research

Physiological and photosynthetic response of quinoa to drought stress

Rachid Fghire; Fatima Anaya; Oudou Issa Ali; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
93
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Water shortage is a critical problem touching plant growth and yield in semi-arid areas, for instance the Mediterranean region. For this reason was studied the physiological basis of drought tolerance of a new, drought tolerant crop quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) tested in Morocco in two successive seasons, subject to four irrigation treatments (100, 50, and 33%ETc, and rainfed). The chlorophyll a fluorescence transients were analyzed by the JIP-test to translate stressinduced damage in these transients to changes in biophysical parameter's allowing quantification of the energy flow through the photosynthetic apparatus. Drought stress induced a significant decrease in the maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (P0 = Fv/Fm), and the quantum yield of electron transport (E0). The amount of active Photosystem II (PSII) reaction centers (RC) per excited cross section (RC/CS) also decreased when exposed to the highest drought stress. The effective antenna size of active RCs (ABS/RC) increased and the effective dissipation per active reaction centers (DIo/RC) increased by increasing drought stress during the growth season in comparison to the control. However the performance index (PI), was a very sensitive indicator of the physiological status of plants. Leaf area index, leaf water potential and stomatal conductance decreased as the drought increased. These results indicate that, in quinoa leaf, JIP-test can be used as a sensitive method for measuring drought stress effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistrye0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress induced a significant decrease in the maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (P0 = Fv/Fm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–745 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought significantly decreased quantum yield of electron transport.

Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
quantum yield of electron transporte0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress induced a significant decrease in the maximum quantum yield of primary photochemistry (P0 = Fv/Fm), and the quantum yield of electron transport (E0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–795 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Active PSII reaction centers per excited cross section decreased under highest drought stress.

Treatment
highest drought stresse0
Outcome
active Photosystem II (PSII) reaction centers (RC) per excited cross section (RC/CS)e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of active Photosystem II (PSII) reaction centers (RC) per excited cross section (RC/CS) also decreased when exposed to the highest drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective antenna size of active reaction centers increased with drought stress relative to control.

Treatment
increasing drought stresse0
Outcome
effective antenna size of active RCs (ABS/RC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective antenna size of active RCs (ABS/RC) increased and the effective dissipation per active reaction centers (DIo/RC) increased by increasing drought stress during the growth season in comparison to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective dissipation per active reaction center increased with drought stress relative to control.

Treatment
increasing drought stresse0
Outcome
effective dissipation per active reaction centers (DIo/RC)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effective antenna size of active RCs (ABS/RC) increased and the effective dissipation per active reaction centers (DIo/RC) increased by increasing drought stress during the growth season in comparison to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Performance index was a very sensitive indicator of plant physiological status.

Outcome
very sensitive indicator of the physiological status of plantse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the performance index (PI), was a very sensitive indicator of the physiological status of plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area index decreased as drought increased.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
Leaf area indexe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index, leaf water potential and stomatal conductance decreased as the drought increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf water potential decreased as drought increased.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
leaf water potentiale0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index, leaf water potential and stomatal conductance decreased as the drought increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance decreased as drought increased.

Treatment
droughte0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf area index, leaf water potential and stomatal conductance decreased as the drought increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The JIP-test can sensitively measure drought stress effects in quinoa leaves.

Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
sensitive method for measuring drought stress effectse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in quinoa leaf, JIP-test can be used as a sensitive method for measuring drought stress effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1505 · show in text ↑
t0

“quinoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–51 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · growth · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.