Paper · 2015 · Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Citrus reticulata blanco leaf extract on seed germination and initial seedling growth parameters of five home garden food crops

Sahoo U K; Jeeceelee L; Lallinrawna S; et al.

9
claims
10
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effect of various concentrations of Citrus reticulata Blanco leaf extract was studied on seed germination and seedling growth of five common home garden food crops viz. Capsicum annum L. (Chilli), Glycine max (L.) Merr. (Soybean), Zea mays L. (Maize), Oryza sativa L. (Rice), and Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench (Lady's finger) in laboratory using Petri dishes with sterilized absorbent cotton. The experiment was conducted under natural light dark cycle with three replicates. The seeds were regularly irrigated with the C. reticulata extracts. Results of the study revealed that the aqueous leaf extract of C. reticulata have significant effect on seed germination and plant growth. The highest inhibitory effect (55%) of leaf extract was reported on seed germination of chilli at 80% extract concentration and the lowest (3.33%) in maize at absolute concentration. The highest inhibitory effect (65.26%) on shoot elongation was recorded in the maize at 80% extract concentration while at this concentration, maximum inhibition (58.52%) on root elongation was registered in soybean. Under pot culture, shoot length in paddy and dry matter accumulation in chilli were inhibited at all concentration. In general higher concentrations had stronger inhibitory effects while in some cases the lower concentration had stimulatory effects. The study also revealed that the inhibitory effect was much pronounced in shoot and root lengths as compared with the germination of the receptor crops.The studies provide the evidence of C. reticulata having allelopathic potential which reduces the germination as well suppresses the growth and development of the test crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The aqueous leaf extract of Citrus reticulata had a significant effect on seed germination and plant growth of five common home garden food crops.

Taxon
five common home garden food cropse1
Treatment
aqueous leaf extract of C. reticulatae0
Outcome
seed germination and plant growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“aqueous leaf extract of C. reticulata have significant effect on seed germination and plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“five common home garden food crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–163 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf extract of C. reticulata had its highest inhibitory effect on chilli seed germination (55%) at 80% extract concentration.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
80% extract concentratione0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
inhibitorye0
Value
55%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The highest inhibitory effect (55%) of leaf extract was reported on seed germination of chilli at 80% extract concentration and the lowest (3.33%) in maize at absolute concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf extract of C. reticulata had its lowest inhibitory effect on maize seed germination (3.33%) at absolute concentration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
absolute concentratione0
Outcome
seed germinatione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest inhibitory effect (55%) of leaf extract was reported on seed germination of chilli at 80% extract concentration and the lowest (3.33%) in maize at absolute concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest inhibitory effect of the extract on shoot elongation (65.26%) was in maize at 80% extract concentration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
80% extract concentratione0
Outcome
shoot elongatione0
Direction
inhibitorye0
Value
65.26%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest inhibitory effect (65.26%) on shoot elongation was recorded in the maize at 80% extract concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–984 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At that 80% concentration the maximum inhibition of root elongation (58.52%) was in soybean.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
this concentratione0
Outcome
root elongatione0
Direction
maximum inhibitione0
Value
58.52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at this concentration, maximum inhibition (58.52%) on root elongation was registered in soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 991–1086 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under pot culture, shoot length in paddy was inhibited at all extract concentrations.

Taxon
paddye0
Treatment
all concentratione0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Setting
pot culturee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under pot culture, shoot length in paddy and dry matter accumulation in chilli were inhibited at all concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1202 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under pot culture, dry matter accumulation in chilli was inhibited at all extract concentrations.

Taxon
chillie0
Treatment
all concentratione0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Setting
pot culturee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Under pot culture, shoot length in paddy and dry matter accumulation in chilli were inhibited at all concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1202 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In general higher extract concentrations had stronger inhibitory effects, while in some cases lower concentrations had stimulatory effects.

Treatment
higher concentrationse0
Outcome
inhibitory effectse0
Direction
strongere0
Qualifier
in some cases the lower concentration had stimulatory effectse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In general higher concentrations had stronger inhibitory effects while in some cases the lower concentration had stimulatory effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1336 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The inhibitory effect was much more pronounced on shoot and root lengths than on germination of the receptor crops.

Taxon
receptor cropse0
Organ / stage
shoot and root lengthse0
Outcome
inhibitory effecte0
Direction
much pronouncede0
Comparator
germinatione0

Verbatim

e0

“the inhibitory effect was much pronounced in shoot and root lengths as compared with the germination of the receptor crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1489 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

botanical · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

340 papers: 198 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 198 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

336 papers more in this group

See all 340 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.