Abstract
The aim of the research is decreasing greenhouse soil pH by micronized-sulphur with bentonite and organic matter applications. The effects of the soil pH on fruit yield, fruit quality properties, plant growth and plant nutrition have been investigated. Micronized-sulphur with bentonite and leonardite were applied 150 kg/ha and 2000 kg/ha, respectively. Greenhouse soil pH at the beginning was 8.1 and the end of the experiment (approx. 5 months) it was decreased 0.51 unit and 0.45 unit by the application of sulphure and organic matter, respectively. The treatments were increasingly affected tomato yield in the experiment; 5.6 kg/m2, 5.8 kg/m2 ve 4.7 kg/m2 tomato yields were obtanied from organic matter, sulphur and control, respectively. Plant growth and development, nutrients uptake and fruit properties were also positively affected by the soil pH decreasing applications
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur application decreased greenhouse soil pH by 0.51 unit.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- sulphuree0
- Outcome
- Greenhouse soil pHe0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 0.51 unite0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Greenhouse soil pH at the beginning was 8.1 and the end of the experiment (approx. 5 months) it was decreased 0.51 unit and 0.45 unit by the application of sulphure and organic matter, respectively.”
t0“tomato plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic matter decreased greenhouse soil pH by 0.45 unit.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- organic mattere0
- Outcome
- Greenhouse soil pHe0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 0.45 unite0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Greenhouse soil pH at the beginning was 8.1 and the end of the experiment (approx. 5 months) it was decreased 0.51 unit and 0.45 unit by the application of sulphure and organic matter, respectively.”
t0“tomato plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Organic matter yielded 5.6 kg/m2 versus control at 4.7 kg/m2.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- organic mattere0
- Outcome
- tomato yieldse0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 5.6 kg/m2e0
- Qualifier
- 4.7 kg/m2e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“5.6 kg/m2, 5.8 kg/m2 ve 4.7 kg/m2 tomato yields were obtanied from organic matter, sulphur and control, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur yielded 5.8 kg/m2 versus control at 4.7 kg/m2.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume0
- Treatment
- sulphure0
- Outcome
- tomato yieldse0
- Direction
- higherinferrede0
- Value
- 5.8 kg/m2e0
- Qualifier
- 4.7 kg/m2e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“5.6 kg/m2, 5.8 kg/m2 ve 4.7 kg/m2 tomato yields were obtanied from organic matter, sulphur and control, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil pH lowering applications positively affected tomato growth, nutrient uptake and fruit properties.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
- Treatment
- soil pH decreasing applicationse0
- Outcome
- Plant growth and development, nutrients uptake and fruit propertiese0
- Direction
- positively affectede0
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plant growth and development, nutrients uptake and fruit properties were also positively affected by the soil pH decreasing applications”
e1“tomato yields were obtanied”
e2“control, respectively.”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →organic · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →organic · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →ph · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.