Paper · 2010 · Soil Science & Plant Nutrition

Growth injury induced by high pH in rice and tomato

Osamu Kobayashi; Kyoko Higuchi; Eitaro Miwa; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract An extremely high pH, above 10, can occur in sodic soils and even in saline soils after heavy rainfall. The indirect and adverse effects on plant growth that are induced by a high soil pH have been well clarified and include nutritional disorders such as P, Fe and Zn deficiencies and NH3 and HCO3 − toxicities. However, studies of the growth injuries induced by the high pH itself are quite limited. We conducted studies to clarify the effect of a high pH on the growth of rice and tomato using a solution culture system developed to eliminate nutrient deficiencies and NH3 and HCO3 − toxicities. Although the P, Fe and Zn contents in the shoots were at a sufficiently high level, growth of the tomato and rice was markedly reduced by the high pH conditions (at pH 10 and 11). Our results show the existence of growth injuries in higher plants, induced by a pH above 10. Inhibition of root elongation might be the primary growth disturbance induced by the direct adverse effect of the high pH.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of rice was markedly reduced at pH 10 and 11 despite sufficient shoot P, Fe and Zn.

Treatment
high pH conditions (at pH 10 and 11)e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
markedly reducede0
Qualifier
P, Fe and Zn contents in the shoots were at a sufficiently high levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the P, Fe and Zn contents in the shoots were at a sufficiently high level, growth of the tomato and rice was markedly reduced by the high pH conditions (at pH 10 and 11).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest root elongation inhibition may be the primary direct high-pH growth injury in rice.

Treatment
high pHe0
Outcome
Inhibition of root elongatione0
Qualifier
might be the primary growth disturbancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inhibition of root elongation might be the primary growth disturbance induced by the direct adverse effect of the high pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of tomato was markedly reduced at pH 10 and 11 despite sufficient shoot P, Fe and Zn.

Treatment
high pH conditions (at pH 10 and 11)e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
markedly reducede0
Qualifier
P, Fe and Zn contents in the shoots were at a sufficiently high levele0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the P, Fe and Zn contents in the shoots were at a sufficiently high level, growth of the tomato and rice was markedly reduced by the high pH conditions (at pH 10 and 11).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–786 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest root elongation inhibition may be the primary direct high-pH growth injury in tomato.

Treatment
high pHe0
Outcome
Inhibition of root elongatione0
Qualifier
might be the primary growth disturbancee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inhibition of root elongation might be the primary growth disturbance induced by the direct adverse effect of the high pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice and tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–51 · show in text ↑

alkalinity · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 5 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

alkalinity · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 3 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

ph · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 10 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

ph · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 11 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.