Paper · 2016 · Canadian Journal of Soil Science

IMPACTS OF TILLAGE, STUBBLE MANAGEMENT AND NITROGEN ON WHEAT PRODUCTION AND SOIL PROPERTIES

Abdul Basir; Mohammad Tariq Jan; Mukhtar Alam; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
21
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In continuous cereal-based crop rotation, inappropriate residue management such as burning and removing may deteriorate soil properties and crop productivity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different tillage systems (TSs), nitrogen fertilization, and maize (Zea mays L.) stubble management (SM) on subsequent wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) crop and soil properties. The experiment consisted of three TSs, i.e., shallowing with rotavator (0–10 cm), conventional (0–20 cm), and deep tillage (0–30 cm) as main plots, whereas the subplots were SM (removal, burning, or incorporation) with or without 120 kg N ha−1 as urea. The treatments were laid out in a split-plot fashion with whole-plot factor in a randomized complete block design. Shallow tillage (ST) increased wheat yield and soil moisture retention, soil mineral N, total N, and organic carbon. Similarly, stubble incorporation with N fertilization enhanced grain yield and soil properties as compared with the stubble removed or burning treatments. Synergetic effects were noted between ST and residue incorporation with N fertilization for grain yield and soil N response. We conclude that in a cereal-based cropping system, ST and maize stubble incorporation accompanied by N fertilization can improve soil properties and productivity of subsequent wheat crop in existing soil conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow tillage increased wheat yield.

Treatment
Shallow tillagee0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallow tillage (ST) increased wheat yield and soil moisture retention, soil mineral N, total N, and organic carbon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow tillage increased soil moisture retention, soil mineral N, total N, and organic carbon.

Treatment
Shallow tillagee0
Outcome
soil moisture retention, soil mineral N, total N, and organic carbone0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shallow tillage (ST) increased wheat yield and soil moisture retention, soil mineral N, total N, and organic carbon.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stubble incorporation with N fertilization enhanced grain yield relative to stubble removal or burning.

Treatment
stubble incorporation with N fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
stubble removed or burning treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, stubble incorporation with N fertilization enhanced grain yield and soil properties as compared with the stubble removed or burning treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stubble incorporation with N fertilization enhanced soil properties relative to stubble removal or burning.

Treatment
stubble incorporation with N fertilizatione0
Outcome
soil propertiese0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
stubble removed or burning treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similarly, stubble incorporation with N fertilization enhanced grain yield and soil properties as compared with the stubble removed or burning treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallow tillage and residue incorporation with N fertilization had synergistic effects on grain yield and soil N response.

Treatment
ST and residue incorporation with N fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain yield and soil N responsee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Synergetic effects were noted between ST and residue incorporation with N fertilization for grain yield and soil N response.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 · show in text ↑

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.