Paper · 1992 · Seibutsu kankyō chōsetsu/Seibutsu kankyou chousetsu

Studies on a Zone Cooling System in a Greenhouse. 2. Evaluation of a System for Microclimate Modification in a Plastic Greenhouse during Hot Weather.

Herry SUHARDIYANTO; Takahisa MATSUOKA

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A zone cooling system was tested to modify the greenhouse microclimate for plant growing with the minimum energy input during hot weather. The cooling system was equipped with perforated polyethylene tubes to distribute cool air from spot coolers into the zone in which spinach plants were grown in pots in a plastic greenhouse during the summer of 1991. The ratio of the cooling capacity of the spot coolers to the floor area of the cooled zone in the greenhouse was 0.18 kW⋅ m-2. The cooling system was turned on when one of the air temperature sensors at four positions in the plant zone exceeded 30°C and turned off when all the air temperature data at these positions decreased to 27°C. The overall transmissivity of greenhouse cover and shading materials to solar radiation was 0.54. Watering was done to meet the requirements of the spinach plants. The microclimate conditions in the cooled zone were compared with that in a naturally ventilated zone in a similar greenhouse.During sunny days throughout the experimental period when the daily solar radiation exceeded 18 M J⋅m-2⋅day-1, we were able to maintain the daily maximum air temperature in the plant zone from 30.4 to 36.8°C compared to from 32.0 to 39.0°C in the naturally ventilated plant zone. During the above experimental days, the electrical energy required to run the system was 0.57 to 0.68 M J⋅m-2⋅day-1, and the daily total cooling time was 8.2 to 9.5 hr⋅day-1. Under these conditions, the daily degree-hour value in the cooled plant zone was 22 to 2 7°C⋅hr⋅day-1 lower than that in the naturally ventilated plant zone. The growth of spinach plants in both cooled and naturally ventilated zones showed that the fresh weight of the top part of the spinach plants in the cooled zone exceeded twice that of the naturally ventilated environment on the 45th day after sowing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cooled zone kept the daily maximum air temperature at 30.4 to 36.8°C, compared with 32.0 to 39.0°C in the naturally ventilated zone.

Treatment
zone cooling systeme0
Outcome
daily maximum air temperaturee2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Value
30.4 to 36.8°Ce2
Comparator
naturally ventilated plant zonee2
Setting
plastic greenhousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A zone cooling system was tested to modify the greenhouse microclimate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach plants were grown in pots in a plastic greenhouse during the summer of 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–353 · show in text ↑
e2

“we were able to maintain the daily maximum air temperature in the plant zone from 30.4 to 36.8°C compared to from 32.0 to 39.0°C in the naturally ventilated plant zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The daily degree-hour value in the cooled zone was 22 to 27 °C·hr·day-1 lower than in the naturally ventilated zone.

Treatment
zone cooling systeme0
Outcome
daily degree-hour valuee5
Direction
lowere5
Value
22 to 2 7°C⋅hr⋅day-1e5
Comparator
naturally ventilated plant zonee5
Setting
plastic greenhousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A zone cooling system was tested to modify the greenhouse microclimate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“spinach plants were grown in pots in a plastic greenhouse during the summer of 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–353 · show in text ↑
e5

“the daily degree-hour value in the cooled plant zone was 22 to 2 7°C⋅hr⋅day-1 lower than that in the naturally ventilated plant zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1593 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The electrical energy required to run the zone cooling system was 0.57 to 0.68 MJ m-2 day-1.

Outcome
electrical energy required to run the systeme3
Value
0.57 to 0.68 M J⋅m-2⋅day-1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spinach plants were grown in pots in a plastic greenhouse during the summer of 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–353 · show in text ↑
e3

“the electrical energy required to run the system was 0.57 to 0.68 M J⋅m-2⋅day-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1377 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The daily total cooling time of the system was 8.2 to 9.5 hr day-1.

Outcome
daily total cooling timee4
Value
8.2 to 9.5 hr⋅day-1e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“spinach plants were grown in pots in a plastic greenhouse during the summer of 1991”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–353 · show in text ↑
e4

“the daily total cooling time was 8.2 to 9.5 hr⋅day-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach top fresh weight in the cooled zone exceeded twice that of the naturally ventilated environment on day 45 after sowing.

Treatment
zone cooling systeme0
Outcome
fresh weight of the top part of the spinach plantse6
Direction
exceedede6
Value
twicee6
Qualifier
on the 45th day after sowinge6
Comparator
naturally ventilated environmente6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A zone cooling system was tested to modify the greenhouse microclimate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–70 · show in text ↑
e6

“the fresh weight of the top part of the spinach plants in the cooled zone exceeded twice that of the naturally ventilated environment on the 45th day after sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1682–1844 · show in text ↑

processing · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · soil: physics · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.