Paper · 2001 · Drying Technology

DRYING OF SPINACH WITH A HIGH ELECTRIC FIELD

T. R. Bajgai; F. Hashinaga

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
78
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract An alternating current high electric field (HEF) of 430 kV/m generated by multiple point-to-plate-electrodes was used to dry spinach (Spinacia oleracea L). Point electrodes distributed above a layer of fresh spinach were effective in removing moisture. Drying continuously for 7 h removed 80.1% of the total moisture compared with 79.8% and 19.3% when dried in an oven (60°C) and in ambient air (25°C), respectively. The Hunter 'a' value for HEF-dried samples maintained most of the original green color compared with oven-drying, during which the spinach turned brown. Total chlorophyll (Chl), Chl a and Chl b contents in spinach were substantially higher after HEF-drying than oven-drying. The ascorbic acid content after six weeks of storage of the dried material was almost three times higher in HEF-dried samples than those oven-dried. HPLC determinations of organic acids and sugars indicated no formation of by-products in post-HEF-dried spinach. Keywords: HPLCNon-thermal dryingOrganic acidsSugarsAscorbic acidChlorophyll Acknowledgments

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Point electrodes removed moisture from fresh spinach.

Outcome
removing moisturee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Point electrodes distributed above a layer of fresh spinach were effective in removing moisture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–261 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven hours of HEF drying removed 80.1% total moisture versus 79.8% in an oven and 19.3% in ambient air.

Treatment
Drying continuously for 7 he0
Outcome
total moisturee0
Direction
removede0
Value
80.1%e0
Qualifier
79.8% and 19.3%e0
Comparator
an oven (60°C) and in ambient air (25°C)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drying continuously for 7 h removed 80.1% of the total moisture compared with 79.8% and 19.3% when dried in an oven (60°C) and in ambient air (25°C), respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–425 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPINACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HEF drying retained more original green color than oven drying.

Treatment
HEF-driede0
Outcome
Hunter 'a' valuee0
Direction
maintainede0
Comparator
oven-dryinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Hunter 'a' value for HEF-dried samples maintained most of the original green color compared with oven-drying, during which the spinach turned brown.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–578 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b were higher after HEF drying than oven drying.

Treatment
HEF-dryinge0
Outcome
Total chlorophyll (Chl), Chl a and Chl b contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
oven-dryinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total chlorophyll (Chl), Chl a and Chl b contents in spinach were substantially higher after HEF-drying than oven-drying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After six weeks, ascorbic acid was almost three times higher in HEF dried material than oven dried material.

Treatment
HEF-driede0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
almost three timese0
Qualifier
after six weeks of storagee0
Comparator
oven-driede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The ascorbic acid content after six weeks of storage of the dried material was almost three times higher in HEF-dried samples than those oven-dried.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“SPINACH”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–17 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HPLC found no byproducts in HEF dried spinach.

Treatment
post-HEF-driede0
Outcome
no formation of by-productse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HPLC determinations of organic acids and sugars indicated no formation of by-products in post-HEF-dried spinach.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–962 · show in text ↑

processing · soil: physics · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.