Paper · 2016 · Irrigation and Drainage

Effect of Early-Stage Regulated Deficit Irrigation on Stem Lodging Resistance, Leaf Photosynthesis, Root Respiration and Yield Stability of Winter Wheat under Post-Anthesis Water Stress Conditions

Shou-Chen Ma; Shou-Chen Ma; Ai-Wang Duan; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
21
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field micro-plot experiment was conducted to study the effect of early-stage regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) on the stress tolerance of winter wheat in the late growth stage. Plants were subjected to two RDI treatments: proper water deficits (45-55% field water capacity) were imposed during tillering—the beginning of the spring growth stage (T1) and during the beginning of spring growth to the end of the stem elongation stage (T2). The control plants (CK) were maintained with an adequate water supply until anthesis. The results showed that T1 and T2 shortened the length of the first and second internodes, and increased their weight per unit length, and thereby enhanced stem lodging resistance. Although post-anthesis drought and waterlogging lowered leaf photosynthetic rate and root respiration rate, the two RDI treatments improved significantly compared to the control. The two RDI treatments had no significant effects on grain yield under post-anthesis well-watered conditions but increased grain yield and yield stability of wheat under post-anthesis water stress. In addition, T1 and T2 significantly reduced water consumption and increased water productivity (WP) of wheat compared to the control. In summary, this study shows that appropriate RDI at early growth stages increased grain yield and yield stability through improving population characteristics, root respiration and photosynthesis of plants under post-anthesis water stress conditions. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Une expérience de terrain en micro-parcelle a été menée pour étudier l'effet du déficit d'irrigation (RDI) au stade précoce du blé d'hiver sur sa tolérance au stress en fin de la croissance. Les plantes ont été soumises à deux traitements de RDI: les déficits en eau ont été imposés du tallage au stade de développement de la pousse (T1), et de ce stade à la fin du stade tige d'allongement de la tige (T2). Les plantes de contrôle (CK) ont eu un approvisionnement en eau adéquat jusqu'à la floraison. Les résultats ont montré que T1 et T2 raccourcissent la longueur des premier et deuxième inter-nœuds, et augmentent leur poids par unité de longueur, et, par voie de conséquence, augmentent la résistance de la tige. Bien que la sécheresse et l'engorgement post-anthèse aient abaissé le taux de photosynthèse des feuilles et le taux de respiration des racines, les deux traitements de RDI ont montré une amélioration considérable du rendement par rapport au contrôle. Les deux traitements RDI n'ont pas montré d'effet significatif sur le rendement en grain en cas de post-anthèse correctement arrosée, alors que ce même rendement a augmenté et avec une meilleure stabilité dans le cas de post-anthèse hydriquement stressée. En outre, T1 et T2 se sont accompagnés d'une réduction significative de la consommation en eau du blé et de l'augmentation de la productivité de l'eau (WP). En résumé, cette étude montre qu'une RDI appropriée au début de croissance a augmenté le rendement en grain et la stabilité du rendement grâce à l'amélioration des caractéristiques de la population, la respiration des racines et la photosynthèse des plantes sous conditions de stress hydrique post-anthèse. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI shortened the first and second internodes.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
T1 and T2e0
Outcome
length of the first and second internodese0
Direction
shortenede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 and T2 shortened the length of the first and second internodes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI increased internode weight per unit length.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
T1 and T2e0
Outcome
weight per unit lengthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 and T2 shortened the length of the first and second internodes, and increased their weight per unit length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI enhanced stem lodging resistance.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
T1 and T2e0
Outcome
stem lodging resistancee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 and T2 shortened the length of the first and second internodes, and increased their weight per unit length, and thereby enhanced stem lodging resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–707 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis drought and waterlogging lowered leaf photosynthetic rate.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
post-anthesis drought and waterlogginge0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
lowerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-anthesis drought and waterlogging lowered leaf photosynthetic rate and root respiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-anthesis drought and waterlogging lowered root respiration.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
post-anthesis drought and waterlogginge0
Outcome
root respiration ratee0
Direction
lowerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-anthesis drought and waterlogging lowered leaf photosynthetic rate and root respiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–814 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI significantly improved leaf photosynthesis and root respiration under post-anthesis stress.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two RDI treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic rate and root respiration ratee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although post-anthesis drought and waterlogging lowered leaf photosynthetic rate and root respiration rate, the two RDI treatments improved significantly compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 708–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI did not significantly affect grain yield with post-anthesis adequate water.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two RDI treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant effectse0
Qualifier
post-anthesis well-watered conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two RDI treatments had no significant effects on grain yield under post-anthesis well-watered conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI increased grain yield under post-anthesis water stress.

Treatment
two RDI treatmentse1
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield and yield stability of wheat under post-anthesis water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1083 · show in text ↑
e1

“The two RDI treatments had no significant effects on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI increased yield stability under post-anthesis water stress.

Treatment
two RDI treatmentse1
Outcome
yield stabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased grain yield and yield stability of wheat under post-anthesis water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1083 · show in text ↑
e1

“The two RDI treatments had no significant effects on grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–951 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI significantly reduced water consumption.

Treatment
T1 and T2e0
Outcome
water consumptione0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 and T2 significantly reduced water consumption and increased water productivity (WP) of wheat compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDI increased wheat water productivity.

Treatment
T1 and T2e0
Outcome
water productivity (WP)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T1 and T2 significantly reduced water consumption and increased water productivity (WP) of wheat compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1219 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

44 papers: 7 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

flooding · physiology: respiration · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 32 positive, 18 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

246 papers: 41 positive, 205 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

242 papers more in this group

See all 246 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

drought · physiology: respiration · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.