Paper · 2022 · Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture

Wheat nitrogen utilization efficiency and yield as affected by nitrogen management and environmental conditions

Letícia Aparecida Ronqui Ferreira; Sérgio Ricardo Silva; Rômulo Pisa Lollato; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) is the main nutrient for plant nutrition, however, its fertilization management is still very complex. To evaluate wheat N utilization efficiency (NUtE) and yield in response to N fertilization management considering the influence of environmental conditions, an experiment was carried out in three field conditions in Southern Brazil: Londrina in rainfed and irrigation conditions, and Ponta Grossa in rainfed. A complete (2 × 2 × 2) + 1 factorial arrangement evaluated two N rates (40 and 80 kg ha-1), two N sources (ammonium nitrate and urea), two N timings of fertilization (at sowing or at the beginning of plant tillering), and additional treatment without N fertilization. Agronomic characteristics related to wheat productivity and N plant nutrition were evaluated. Irrigation increased the density of fertile spikes and the N accumulated in the shoot dry matter at anthesis, which partially explained the better grain yield in the irrigated condition. The higher N accumulation in the shoot dry matter was essential for grain yield increase in the environments with lower water deficit, based on their higher NUtE for grain yield. Nitrogen fertilization reduced NUtE for grain yield in Londrina (in rainfed and irrigation conditions), and increased NUtE for shoot dry matter production in all environments. In a colder condition (i.e. Ponta Grossa), the use of a higher N rate at sowing provided greater grain yield, thousand-grain weight, and density of fertile spikes. Nitrogen rate can be reduced in warmer and wetter environmental conditions that favor the mineralization of soil organic matter and the decomposition of soybean straw. The choice for urea or ammonium nitrate can be based on economic criteria in environments with low water deficit and low potential for NH3 volatilization. Nitrogen fertilization carried out exclusively at wheat sowing may be suitable to supply spring wheat N requirements.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased the density of fertile spikes and the N accumulated in the shoot dry matter at anthesis in wheat.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
density of fertile spikes and the N accumulated in the shoot dry matter at anthesise0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased the density of fertile spikes and the N accumulated in the shoot dry matter at anthesis, which partially explained the better grain yield in the irrigated condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation gave better wheat grain yield in the irrigated condition.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Setting
irrigated conditione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased the density of fertile spikes and the N accumulated in the shoot dry matter at anthesis, which partially explained the better grain yield in the irrigated condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher density of fertile spikes and N accumulation partly explain the better grain yield under irrigation.

Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
partially explainede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased the density of fertile spikes and the N accumulated in the shoot dry matter at anthesis, which partially explained the better grain yield in the irrigated condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher N accumulation in the shoot dry matter was essential for the grain yield increase in environments with lower water deficit.

Treatment
higher N accumulation in the shoot dry mattere1
Outcome
grain yield increasee1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
environments with lower water deficite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The higher N accumulation in the shoot dry matter was essential for grain yield increase in the environments with lower water deficit, based on their higher NUtE for grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher NUtE for grain yield occurred in environments with lower water deficit.

Outcome
NUtE for grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Setting
environments with lower water deficite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The higher N accumulation in the shoot dry matter was essential for grain yield increase in the environments with lower water deficit, based on their higher NUtE for grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization reduced NUtE for grain yield in Londrina under rainfed and irrigated conditions.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione2
Outcome
NUtE for grain yielde2
Direction
reducede2
Setting
Londrinae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Nitrogen fertilization reduced NUtE for grain yield in Londrina (in rainfed and irrigation conditions), and increased NUtE for shoot dry matter production in all environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization increased NUtE for shoot dry matter production in all environments.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizatione2
Outcome
NUtE for shoot dry matter productione2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
all environmentse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Nitrogen fertilization reduced NUtE for grain yield in Londrina (in rainfed and irrigation conditions), and increased NUtE for shoot dry matter production in all environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1327 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A higher N rate at sowing gave greater grain yield, thousand-grain weight and density of fertile spikes in the colder Ponta Grossa environment.

Treatment
higher N rate at sowinge3
Outcome
grain yield, thousand-grain weight, and density of fertile spikese3
Direction
greatere3
Setting
colder condition (i.e. Ponta Grossa)e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“In a colder condition (i.e. Ponta Grossa), the use of a higher N rate at sowing provided greater grain yield, thousand-grain weight, and density of fertile spikes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1491 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate can be reduced in warmer and wetter environmental conditions.

Outcome
Nitrogen ratee4
Qualifier
in warmer and wetter environmental conditionse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Nitrogen rate can be reduced in warmer and wetter environmental conditions that favor the mineralization of soil organic matter and the decomposition of soybean straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1493–1659 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The choice of urea or ammonium nitrate can be based on economic criteria in environments with low water deficit.

Outcome
urea or ammonium nitratee5
Qualifier
economic criteriae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The choice for urea or ammonium nitrate can be based on economic criteria in environments with low water deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1661–1773 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization exclusively at sowing may be suitable to supply spring wheat N requirements.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume6
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilization carried out exclusively at wheat sowinge6
Outcome
N requirementse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Nitrogen fertilization carried out exclusively at wheat sowing may be suitable to supply spring wheat N requirements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1932 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 142 positive, 34 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.