Paper · 2013 · Northern Horticulture

Influence of Reclaimed Water Irrigation and Sludge Fertilizer on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Vegetables

Wang Wen-qua

14
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Taking pakchoi and radish as material,the effects of reclaimed water irrigation and sludge fertilization on the seed germination rate and seedling growth of pakchoi and radish were analyzed.The results showed that the reclaimed water irrigation favored both germination of pakchoi seeds,growth of pakchoi underground part and increase of fresh weight.The biomass of pakchoi irrigated with reclaimed water+sludge fertilizer increased by 55.70%compared to the pakchoi only treated with clean water.Sludge fertilizer favored seeds germination and growth of radish.The biomass of radish irrigated with reclaimed water+sludge fertilizer increased by 52.98%compared to the radish only treated with clean water.The latter one had the shortest root length and the minimum weight.The total chlorophyll content of pakchoi irrigated with clean water was the highest,while the MDA content was the lowest.There was negative correlation between total chlorophyll content and MDA content of pakchoi(r=-0.7048),while there was no significant correlation between them in radish leaves.The chlorophyll content of radish irrigated with clean water was the highest, while the MDA content of radish irrigated with reclaimed water and fertilized with sludge was the highest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reclaimed water favored pakchoi germination.

Taxon
pakchoie0
Treatment
reclaimed water irrigatione0
Outcome
germination of pakchoi seedse0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the reclaimed water irrigation favored both germination of pakchoi seeds,growth of pakchoi underground part and increase of fresh weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reclaimed water favored pakchoi underground growth.

Taxon
pakchoie0
Treatment
reclaimed water irrigatione0
Outcome
growth of pakchoi underground parte0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the reclaimed water irrigation favored both germination of pakchoi seeds,growth of pakchoi underground part and increase of fresh weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reclaimed water increased pakchoi fresh weight.

Taxon
pakchoie0
Treatment
reclaimed water irrigatione0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the reclaimed water irrigation favored both germination of pakchoi seeds,growth of pakchoi underground part and increase of fresh weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 214–351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined reclaimed water and sludge increased pakchoi biomass by 55.70% over clean water.

Taxon
pakchoie0
Treatment
reclaimed water+sludge fertilizere0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
55.70%e0
Comparator
clean watere0

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of pakchoi irrigated with reclaimed water+sludge fertilizer increased by 55.70%compared to the pakchoi only treated with clean water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge fertilizer favored radish germination.

Treatment
Sludge fertilizere0
Outcome
seeds germinatione0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sludge fertilizer favored seeds germination and growth of radish.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge fertilizer favored radish growth.

Treatment
Sludge fertilizere0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
favorede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sludge fertilizer favored seeds germination and growth of radish.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–561 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined reclaimed water and sludge increased radish biomass by 52.98% over clean water.

Treatment
reclaimed water+sludge fertilizere0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
52.98%e0
Comparator
clean watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The biomass of radish irrigated with reclaimed water+sludge fertilizer increased by 52.98%compared to the radish only treated with clean water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–704 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clean water produced the shortest radish roots and minimum weight.

Outcome
shortest root length and the minimum weighte0
Direction
shorteste0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The latter one had the shortest root length and the minimum weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–771 · show in text ↑
t0

“Taking pakchoi and radish as material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pakchoi under clean water had the highest total chlorophyll.

Taxon
pakchoie0
Treatment
clean watere0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“The total chlorophyll content of pakchoi irrigated with clean water was the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–854 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pakchoi under clean water had the lowest MDA content.

Taxon
pakchoit0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
loweste0

Verbatim

e0

“while the MDA content was the lowest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“Taking pakchoi and radish as material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pakchoi total chlorophyll and MDA content were negatively correlated at r=-0.7048.

Taxon
pakchoie0
Compound
MDAe0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
negative correlatione0
Value
r=-0.7048e0

Verbatim

e0

“There was negative correlation between total chlorophyll content and MDA content of pakchoi(r=-0.7048)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–994 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Radish leaf chlorophyll and MDA had no significant correlation.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
correlatione0
Direction
no significant correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant correlation between them in radish leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1068 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radish under clean water had the highest chlorophyll content.

Treatment
clean watere0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The chlorophyll content of radish irrigated with clean water was the highest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1144 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radish under reclaimed water and sludge had the highest MDA content.

Treatment
reclaimed water and fertilized with sludgee0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the MDA content of radish irrigated with reclaimed water and fertilized with sludge was the highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1252 · show in text ↑

organic · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

organic · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

irrigation · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 9 positive, 5 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

fertilization · growth · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 90 positive, 21 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica rapa (field mustard)Positive and negative results

127 papers: 107 positive, 20 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

123 papers more in this group

See all 127 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.