Paper · 2013 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Improvement of Alkaline Tobacco Field Soil by Combined Application of Humic Acid and Ferric Sulfate

Li-Qiong Hu

9
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in Chenzhou of Hunan.The humic acid and its mixed application with ferric sulfate were fertilized into alkaline tobacco field.The soil pH,soil fertility and tobacco agronomic characters were determined to study the regulative effects of humic acid with ferric sulfate on the tobacco soil.The results were as follow:(1)Humic acid and its mixed application with ferric sulfate both decreased the pH of tobacco soil.Compared with untreated soil,the soil pH of two treatments were decreased by 0.06 and 0.21,respectively.The effect of compound addition was better than single adding humic acid.(2)Humic acid and its mixed application with ferric sulfate improved the soil fertility.Compared with control,the content of alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen was increased by 9.0% by application humic acid,and the contents of organic matter,alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and available iron were increased by 19.6%,10.5% and 41.7%,respectively by combined application of humic acid and ferric sulfate.Fe content of tobacco leaves reached a significant level,and it was increased by 13.0% by combined application of humic acid and ferric sulfate compared with control.(3)After fertilized humic acid and ferric sulfate,there was no obvious impact on agronomic characters of tobacco,which indicated that they had no significant effect on tobacco growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid lowered tobacco soil pH by 0.06 relative to untreated soil.

Treatment
Humic acide0
Outcome
pH of tobacco soile0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.06e0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Humic acid and its mixed application with ferric sulfate both decreased the pH of tobacco soil.Compared with untreated soil,the soil pH of two treatments were decreased by 0.06 and 0.21,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined humic acid and ferric sulfate lowered tobacco soil pH by 0.21.

Treatment
mixed application with ferric sulfatee0
Outcome
pH of tobacco soile0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
0.21e0
Comparator
untreated soile0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Humic acid and its mixed application with ferric sulfate both decreased the pH of tobacco soil.Compared with untreated soil,the soil pH of two treatments were decreased by 0.06 and 0.21,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–550 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined amendment was better than humic acid alone for pH reduction.

Treatment
compound additione0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
single adding humic acide0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of compound addition was better than single adding humic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–623 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid raised soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen by 9.0%.

Treatment
humic acide0
Outcome
content of alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.0%e0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with control,the content of alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen was increased by 9.0% by application humic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–824 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application increased soil organic matter by 19.6%.

Treatment
combined application of humic acid and ferric sulfatee0
Outcome
organic mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
19.6%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of organic matter,alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and available iron were increased by 19.6%,10.5% and 41.7%,respectively by combined application of humic acid and ferric sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application increased soil alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen by 10.5%.

Treatment
combined application of humic acid and ferric sulfatee0
Outcome
alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogene0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.5%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of organic matter,alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and available iron were increased by 19.6%,10.5% and 41.7%,respectively by combined application of humic acid and ferric sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application increased soil available iron by 41.7%.

Treatment
combined application of humic acid and ferric sulfatee0
Outcome
available irone0
Direction
increasede0
Value
41.7%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of organic matter,alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen and available iron were increased by 19.6%,10.5% and 41.7%,respectively by combined application of humic acid and ferric sulfate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined application increased tobacco leaf Fe by 13.0% significantly.

Treatment
combined application of humic acid and ferric sulfatee0
Outcome
Fe content of tobacco leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.0%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe content of tobacco leaves reached a significant level,and it was increased by 13.0% by combined application of humic acid and ferric sulfate compared with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1184 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid and ferric sulfate had no significant effect on tobacco growth traits.

Treatment
humic acid and ferric sulfatee0
Outcome
agronomic characters of tobaccoe0
Direction
no obvious impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After fertilized humic acid and ferric sulfate,there was no obvious impact on agronomic characters of tobacco,which indicated that they had no significant effect on tobacco growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1367 · show in text ↑

other · organism · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

other · soil: chemistry · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.