Paper · 2007 · Journal of Northwest A & F University

Effects of foliage application of sodium chloride on fruit compression tolerance and quality in processing tomato

HE Lian-shun

15
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of foliage spraying of sodium chloride at different qualities and concentrations during fruit development on fruit firmness,compression tolerance and quality etc were studied with two processing tomato varieties Ligeer 87-5 and Shihong 12 as the experiment materials.The results showed that foliage spraying of sodium chloride could increase the firmness,compression tolerance,quality and yield of fruit,but the same concentration of sodium chloride might result differently on different cultivars.For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance,and increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C,but had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield,and had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield,significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content,but greatly decreased reducing sugar content.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content,but had no obvious influence on the other index.In comprehensive consideration,the suitable concentration of sodium chloride treatment on processing tomato variety falls in the range of 3.0-6.0 g/L.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodium chloride spraying increased fruit firmness, compression tolerance, quality and yield.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Treatment
foliage spraying of sodium chloridee0
Outcome
firmness,compression tolerance,quality and yield of fruite0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“foliage spraying of sodium chloride could increase the firmness,compression tolerance,quality and yield of fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 303–415 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ligeer 87-5 at 3.0 g/L had especially increased yield and compression tolerance.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Ligeer 87-5e0
Treatment
3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente0
Outcome
fruit yield and compression tolerancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ligeer 87-5 at 3.0 g/L had increased sugars, firmness and vitamin C.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Ligeer 87-5e1
Treatment
3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente1
Outcome
total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin Ce0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Schema note from the model: Four outcomes grouped due to claim budget

Verbatim

e0

“increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–728 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance,and increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C,but had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield,and had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield,significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content,but greatly decreased reducing sugar content.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content,but had no obvious influence on the other index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ligeer 87-5 at 6.0 g/L raised reducing sugar and vitamin C.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Ligeer 87-5e1
Treatment
6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente0
Outcome
contents of reducing sugar and vitamin Ce0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance,and increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C,but had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield,and had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield,significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content,but greatly decreased reducing sugar content.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content,but had no obvious influence on the other index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ligeer 87-5 at 6.0 g/L had no significant effect on firmness, tolerance, yield or soluble sugar.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Ligeer 87-5e1
Treatment
6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente1
Outcome
fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugare0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Schema note from the model: Four outcomes grouped due to claim budget

Verbatim

e0

“had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance,and increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C,but had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield,and had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield,significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content,but greatly decreased reducing sugar content.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content,but had no obvious influence on the other index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ligeer 87-5 at 9.0 g/L decreased firmness.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Ligeer 87-5e1
Treatment
9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1023 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance,and increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C,but had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield,and had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield,significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content,but greatly decreased reducing sugar content.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content,but had no obvious influence on the other index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ligeer 87-5 at 9.0 g/L adversely affected compression tolerance and yield.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Ligeer 87-5e1
Treatment
9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente0
Outcome
fruit compression tolerance and yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1085 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance,and increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C,but had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield,and had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield,significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content,but greatly decreased reducing sugar content.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content,but had no obvious influence on the other index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shihong 12 at 3.0 g/L increased yield.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Shihong 12e0
Treatment
3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shihong 12 at 3.0 g/L tended to increase sugars, vitamin C, firmness and compression tolerance.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Shihong 12e1
Treatment
3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente1
Outcome
contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerancee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Schema note from the model: Related outcomes grouped due to claim budget

Verbatim

e0

“had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance,and increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C,but had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield,and had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield,significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content,but greatly decreased reducing sugar content.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content,but had no obvious influence on the other index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shihong 12 at 6.0 g/L maximally increased yield.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Shihong 12e1
Treatment
6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance,and increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C,but had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield,and had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield,significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content,but greatly decreased reducing sugar content.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content,but had no obvious influence on the other index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shihong 12 at 6.0 g/L increased compression tolerance and vitamin C.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Shihong 12e1
Treatment
6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente1
Outcome
fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1453 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance,and increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C,but had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield,and had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield,significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content,but greatly decreased reducing sugar content.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content,but had no obvious influence on the other index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shihong 12 at 6.0 g/L decreased reducing sugar.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Shihong 12e1
Treatment
6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente1
Outcome
reducing sugar contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“greatly decreased reducing sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1458–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance,and increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C,but had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield,and had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield,significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content,but greatly decreased reducing sugar content.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content,but had no obvious influence on the other index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shihong 12 at 9.0 g/L reduced compression tolerance and reducing sugar.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Shihong 12e1
Treatment
9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente0
Outcome
fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1611 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance,and increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C,but had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield,and had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield,significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content,but greatly decreased reducing sugar content.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content,but had no obvious influence on the other index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–1660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shihong 12 at 9.0 g/L had no obvious effect on other indices.

Taxon
processing tomatot0
Material
Shihong 12e1
Treatment
9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatmente1
Outcome
other indexe0
Direction
no obvious influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but had no obvious influence on the other index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1660 · show in text ↑
t0

“processing tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–113 · show in text ↑
e1

“For cv.Ligeer 87-5,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the fruit yield and compression tolerance,and increased total sugar content,fruit firmness and contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly raised the contents of reducing sugar and vitamin C,but had no significant influence on fruit firmness,compression tolerance,yield and the content of total soluble sugar.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly decreased fruit firmness,and had bad effects on fruit compression tolerance and yield.For cv.Shihong 12,3.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly increased the yield,and had the trend to increase the contents of total soluble sugar,reducing sugar,vitamin C and fruit firmness and compression tolerance.6.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment most significantly increased the yield,significantly increased fruit compression tolerance and vitamin C content,but greatly decreased reducing sugar content.9.0 g/L sodium chloride treatment significantly decreased fruit compression tolerance and reducing sugar content,but had no obvious influence on the other index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–1660 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend 3.0–6.0 g/L sodium chloride for processing tomato.

Taxon
processing tomatoe0
Outcome
suitable concentration of sodium chloride treatmente0
Value
3.0-6.0 g/Le0

Verbatim

e0

“the suitable concentration of sodium chloride treatment on processing tomato variety falls in the range of 3.0-6.0 g/L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1810 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · quality: postharvest · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

15 papers: 5 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

sodium chloride · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

48 papers: 8 positive, 40 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

sodium chloride · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sodium chloride · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

sodium chloride · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

150 papers: 134 positive, 16 negative or no effect

133 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

146 papers more in this group

See all 150 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.