Paper · 2021 · BMC Plant Biology

Oxidative damage, antioxidant mechanism and gene expression in tomato responding to salinity stress under in vitro conditions and application of iron and zinc oxide nanoparticles on callus induction and plant regeneration

Mohammad Ali Aazami; Farzad Rasouli; Asghar Ebrahimzadeh

20
claims
45
verbatim quotes
114
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Salinity is one of the most challenging abiotic stresses restricting the growth of plants. In vitro screening will increase the efficiency and speed of salinity tolerant genotypes identifications. The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro to evaluate the seedlings growth, biochemical, and gene expression responses as well as the effect of nano zinc and iron on callus induction and plant regeneration. RESULTS: The results showed that an increase in salinity stress in the medium decreased the germination percentage, fresh and dry weight of shoot, root length, chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids content, K and Ca content, and on the other hand, Na content was increased. MDA content ('Nora', 'PS-10', 'Peto' and 'Roma': 1.71, 1.78, 1.66 and 2.16 folds, respectively), electrolyte leakage ('PS-10': 33.33%; 'Roma': 56.33%), were increased with salinity of 100 mM compared to control. Proline content was increased in 50 mM NaCl (10.8 fold). The most activity of antioxidant enzymes including CAT, SOD, APX, GPX, and GR was observed in the 'PS-10' cultivar, and the lowest activity of these enzymes was observed in 'Roma' under salinity stress. The AsA and GSH were decreased and DHA and GSSG were increased with the increased intensity of salinity. The relative expression of SOD, APX, and GR genes varied in different cultivars at different salinity concentrations. The most percentage of callus induction was observed with applying iron oxide nanoparticles, and the most regeneration rate was recorded using zinc oxide nanoparticles. CONCLUSION: The results showed that salt-tolerant cultivars such as 'PS-10' with better osmotic adjustment, are suitable candidates for the future production and breeding programs. The use of nutrient nanoparticles under salinity stress for different tomato cultivars increased their performance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity in the medium decreased germination percentage and fresh and dry shoot weight of tomato in vitro.

Treatment
salinity stresse1
Outcome
germination percentage, fresh and dry weight of shoote1
Direction
decreasede1
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“an increase in salinity stress in the medium decreased the germination percentage, fresh and dry weight of shoot, root length, chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids content, K and Ca content, and on the other hand, Na content was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–716 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity in the medium decreased root length of tomato in vitro.

Treatment
salinity stresse1
Outcome
root lengthe1
Direction
decreasede1
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“an increase in salinity stress in the medium decreased the germination percentage, fresh and dry weight of shoot, root length, chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids content, K and Ca content, and on the other hand, Na content was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–716 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity in the medium decreased chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids content of tomato in vitro.

Treatment
salinity stresse1
Outcome
chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids contente1
Direction
decreasede1
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“an increase in salinity stress in the medium decreased the germination percentage, fresh and dry weight of shoot, root length, chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids content, K and Ca content, and on the other hand, Na content was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–716 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity in the medium decreased K and Ca content of tomato in vitro.

Treatment
salinity stresse1
Outcome
K and Ca contente1
Direction
decreasede1
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“an increase in salinity stress in the medium decreased the germination percentage, fresh and dry weight of shoot, root length, chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids content, K and Ca content, and on the other hand, Na content was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–716 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity in the medium increased Na content of tomato in vitro.

Treatment
salinity stresse1
Outcome
Na contente1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“an increase in salinity stress in the medium decreased the germination percentage, fresh and dry weight of shoot, root length, chlorophyll a, b and carotenoids content, K and Ca content, and on the other hand, Na content was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–716 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity of 100 mM increased MDA content in cultivar Nora relative to control.

Material
Norae1
Treatment
salinity of 100 mMe3
Outcome
MDA contente1
Direction
increasede3
Value
1.71e1
Comparator
controle3
Setting
in vitroe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“MDA content ('Nora', 'PS-10', 'Peto' and 'Roma': 1.71, 1.78, 1.66 and 2.16 folds, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–813 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“were increased with salinity of 100 mM compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity of 100 mM increased MDA content in cultivar PS-10 relative to control.

Material
PS-10e1
Treatment
salinity of 100 mMe3
Outcome
MDA contente1
Direction
increasede3
Value
1.78e1
Comparator
controle3
Setting
in vitroe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“MDA content ('Nora', 'PS-10', 'Peto' and 'Roma': 1.71, 1.78, 1.66 and 2.16 folds, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–813 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“were increased with salinity of 100 mM compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity of 100 mM increased MDA content in cultivar Peto relative to control.

Material
Petoe1
Treatment
salinity of 100 mMe3
Outcome
MDA contente1
Direction
increasede3
Value
1.66e1
Comparator
controle3
Setting
in vitroe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“MDA content ('Nora', 'PS-10', 'Peto' and 'Roma': 1.71, 1.78, 1.66 and 2.16 folds, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–813 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“were increased with salinity of 100 mM compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity of 100 mM increased MDA content in cultivar Roma relative to control.

Material
Romae1
Treatment
salinity of 100 mMe3
Outcome
MDA contente1
Direction
increasede3
Value
2.16e1
Comparator
controle3
Setting
in vitroe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“MDA content ('Nora', 'PS-10', 'Peto' and 'Roma': 1.71, 1.78, 1.66 and 2.16 folds, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–813 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“were increased with salinity of 100 mM compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity of 100 mM increased electrolyte leakage in cultivar PS-10 relative to control.

Material
PS-10e1
Treatment
salinity of 100 mMe3
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee1
Direction
increasede3
Value
33.33%e1
Comparator
controle3
Setting
in vitroe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“electrolyte leakage ('PS-10': 33.33%; 'Roma': 56.33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–868 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“were increased with salinity of 100 mM compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity of 100 mM increased electrolyte leakage in cultivar Roma relative to control.

Material
Romae1
Treatment
salinity of 100 mMe3
Outcome
electrolyte leakagee1
Direction
increasede3
Value
56.33%e1
Comparator
controle3
Setting
in vitroe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“electrolyte leakage ('PS-10': 33.33%; 'Roma': 56.33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–868 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
e3

“were increased with salinity of 100 mM compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content increased in tomato under 50 mM NaCl, by 10.8 fold.

Treatment
50 mM NaCle1
Outcome
Proline contente1
Direction
increasede1
Value
10.8 folde1
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Proline content was increased in 50 mM NaCl (10.8 fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–985 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant enzyme activity (CAT, SOD, APX, GPX, GR) was highest in cultivar PS-10 and lowest in Roma under salinity stress.

Material
PS-10e1
Treatment
salinity stresse1
Outcome
activity of antioxidant enzymes including CAT, SOD, APX, GPX, and GRe1
Direction
moste1
Comparator
Romae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The most activity of antioxidant enzymes including CAT, SOD, APX, GPX, and GR was observed in the 'PS-10' cultivar, and the lowest activity of these enzymes was observed in 'Roma' under salinity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1188 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under increasing salinity, reduced ascorbate (AsA) and glutathione (GSH) decreased in tomato.

Treatment
increased intensity of salinitye1
Outcome
AsA and GSHe1
Direction
decreasede1
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The AsA and GSH were decreased and DHA and GSSG were increased with the increased intensity of salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1293 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under increasing salinity, dehydroascorbate (DHA) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG) increased in tomato.

Treatment
increased intensity of salinitye1
Outcome
DHA and GSSGe1
Direction
increasede1
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The AsA and GSH were decreased and DHA and GSSG were increased with the increased intensity of salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1293 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative expression of SOD, APX and GR genes varied among tomato cultivars and salinity concentrations.

Material
cultivarse1
Treatment
salinity concentrationse1
Gene
SOD, APX, and GRe1
Outcome
relative expressione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The relative expression of SOD, APX, and GR genes varied in different cultivars at different salinity concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1411 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron oxide nanoparticles gave the highest callus induction percentage in tomato tissue culture.

Organ / stage
calluse1
Treatment
iron oxide nanoparticlese1
Outcome
callus inductione1
Direction
moste1
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The most percentage of callus induction was observed with applying iron oxide nanoparticles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1504 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc oxide nanoparticles gave the highest plant regeneration rate in tomato tissue culture.

Treatment
zinc oxide nanoparticlese1
Outcome
regeneration ratee1
Direction
moste1
Setting
in vitroe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the most regeneration rate was recorded using zinc oxide nanoparticles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1580 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-tolerant tomato cultivar PS-10, with better osmotic adjustment, is suitable for future production and breeding programs.

Material
PS-10e1
Outcome
suitable candidates for the future production and breeding programse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“salt-tolerant cultivars such as 'PS-10' with better osmotic adjustment, are suitable candidates for the future production and breeding programs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1761 · show in text ↑
e2

“The response of four tomato cultivars under salinity was analyzed in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient nanoparticles under salinity stress increased the performance of different tomato cultivars.

Treatment
nutrient nanoparticlese1
Outcome
performancee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The use of nutrient nanoparticles under salinity stress for different tomato cultivars increased their performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1763–1877 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · physiology: osmolytes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

iron oxide nanoparticle · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc oxide nanoparticle · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

salinity · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

71 papers: 11 positive, 60 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

salinity · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 5 positive, 58 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 8 positive, 58 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

82 papers: 32 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

salinity · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

300 papers: 39 positive, 261 negative or no effect

260 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

296 papers more in this group

See all 300 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.