Paper · 2014 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizer on Wheat Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield in Irrigation Area

Yan Jun-yin

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The research aimed to study the effects of spraying foliar fertilizer on the wheat yield,and explore the effects of different kinds of foliar fertilizer on the wheat photosynthetic characteristics. [Method]The scientific and educational park in Henan Agricultural University was selected to research the changes of wheat photosynthetic characteristics and yield. [Result] Spraying monopotassium phosphate and trace element water-soluble fertilizer could decrease leaf SPAD value,but spraying macroelement water-soluble fertilizer,water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acid,water-soluble fertilizer containing humic acid and Penshibao increased leaf SPAD value. All the six foliar fertilizers enhanced photosynthetic efficiency of wheat,with the best effect of monopotassium phosphate. During heading time in wheat,the six kinds of fertilizers increased the parameter Fv / Fm with different degrees. And during filling time in wheat,except that monopotassium phosphate obviously increased Fv / Fm value,the other five kinds of fertilizers decreased Fv / Fm value obviously. The wheat yields were all improved under the six different treatments,and the increased range reached maximum under monopotassium phosphate,which was 6. 43%,followed by Penshibao and water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acid,which were 5. 88% and 4. 66% respectively. [Conclusion] In irrigation area,the effect of spraying monopotassium phosphate was better.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monopotassium phosphate decreased wheat leaf SPAD value.

Treatment
monopotassium phosphatee0
Outcome
leaf SPAD valuee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spraying monopotassium phosphate and trace element water-soluble fertilizer could decrease leaf SPAD value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trace element water-soluble fertilizer decreased wheat leaf SPAD value.

Treatment
trace element water-soluble fertilizere0
Outcome
leaf SPAD valuee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“Spraying monopotassium phosphate and trace element water-soluble fertilizer could decrease leaf SPAD value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

macroelement water-soluble fertilizer increased wheat leaf SPAD value.

Treatment
macroelement water-soluble fertilizere0
Outcome
leaf SPAD valuee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“spraying macroelement water-soluble fertilizer,water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acid,water-soluble fertilizer containing humic acid and Penshibao increased leaf SPAD value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acid increased wheat leaf SPAD value.

Treatment
water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acide0
Outcome
leaf SPAD valuee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“spraying macroelement water-soluble fertilizer,water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acid,water-soluble fertilizer containing humic acid and Penshibao increased leaf SPAD value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

water-soluble fertilizer containing humic acid increased wheat leaf SPAD value.

Treatment
water-soluble fertilizer containing humic acide0
Outcome
leaf SPAD valuee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“spraying macroelement water-soluble fertilizer,water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acid,water-soluble fertilizer containing humic acid and Penshibao increased leaf SPAD value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penshibao increased wheat leaf SPAD value.

Treatment
Penshibaoe0
Outcome
leaf SPAD valuee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“spraying macroelement water-soluble fertilizer,water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acid,water-soluble fertilizer containing humic acid and Penshibao increased leaf SPAD value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–675 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All six foliar fertilizers enhanced wheat photosynthetic efficiency, with monopotassium phosphate having the best effect.

Treatment
six foliar fertilizerse0
Outcome
photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
best effect of monopotassium phosphatee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the six foliar fertilizers enhanced photosynthetic efficiency of wheat,with the best effect of monopotassium phosphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six fertilizers increased wheat Fv / Fm during heading.

Organ / stage
heading timee0
Treatment
six kinds of fertilizerse0
Outcome
Fv / Fme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“During heading time in wheat,the six kinds of fertilizers increased the parameter Fv / Fm with different degrees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monopotassium phosphate increased wheat Fv / Fm during filling.

Organ / stage
filling timee0
Treatment
monopotassium phosphatee0
Outcome
Fv / Fm valuee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“during filling time in wheat,except that monopotassium phosphate obviously increased Fv / Fm value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other five fertilizers decreased wheat Fv / Fm during filling.

Treatment
other five kinds of fertilizerse0
Outcome
Fv / Fm valuee0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“the other five kinds of fertilizers decreased Fv / Fm value obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

monopotassium phosphate increased wheat yield by 6. 43%.

Treatment
monopotassium phosphatee0
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
6. 43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“The wheat yields were all improved under the six different treatments,and the increased range reached maximum under monopotassium phosphate,which was 6. 43%,followed by Penshibao and water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acid,which were 5. 88% and 4. 66% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Penshibao increased wheat yield by 5. 88%.

Treatment
Penshibaoe0
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
5. 88%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“The wheat yields were all improved under the six different treatments,and the increased range reached maximum under monopotassium phosphate,which was 6. 43%,followed by Penshibao and water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acid,which were 5. 88% and 4. 66% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acid increased wheat yield by 4. 66%.

Treatment
water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acide0
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
4. 66%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“The wheat yields were all improved under the six different treatments,and the increased range reached maximum under monopotassium phosphate,which was 6. 43%,followed by Penshibao and water-soluble fertilizer containing amino acid,which were 5. 88% and 4. 66% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other three foliar fertilizer treatments also improved wheat yield.

Treatment
six different treatmentse0
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“The wheat yields were all improved under the six different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1158 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favor spraying monopotassium phosphate in irrigation areas.

Outcome
spraying monopotassium phosphatee0
Setting
irrigation areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
e0

“In irrigation area,the effect of spraying monopotassium phosphate was better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1451 · show in text ↑

amino acid · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium dihydrogen phosphate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

amino acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

micronutrient · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

72 papers: 70 positive, 2 negative or no effect

69 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

133 papers: 126 positive, 7 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

129 papers more in this group

See all 133 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.