Paper · 2026 · Journal of Agriculture and Food Research

Trade-offs and synergies of cultivars and plant growth promoters on wheat physiology and productivity

Sunil Kumar Prajapati; V.K. Verma; Shivendra Singh; et al.

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat production in semi-arid regions faces escalating challenges from water scarcity, heat stress, and climatic variability, making improvements in physiological efficiency and yield stability critical for sustaining productivity. This study evaluated the combined influence of spring wheat cultivars and plant growth promoters (PGPs) on crop performance in a semi-arid climate, using a two-year (rabi 2021-22 and 2022-23) split-plot field experiment with three cultivars (DBW-187, K-1006, and K-607) and six PGPs treatments, including nitrobenzene, GA 3 , seaweed extracts, and micronutrient chelates. Measurements taken at tillering, flowering, and harvest revealed strong cultivar × PGP interactions, with DBW-187 showing superior growth and physiological traits such as higher tiller number (+18.3%), tiller production rate (+19.7%), dry matter accumulation (+18.3%), and improved SPAD, NDVI, and stomatal conductance (+9.5%). Micronutrient chelates (PGP6) emerged as the most effective promoter, enhancing tiller production (+36.0% to +50.5%), dry matter accumulation (+33.4%), leaf area index (+11.6%), and pigment concentrations, ultimately contributing to better stress tolerance and higher yield. The DBW-187 + PGP 6 combination achieved the highest productivity (5.38 t ha -1 ), representing a ∼24% yield increase over the control, while GA 3 also produced notable gains (12.8-19.4%). Overall, the results highlight that integrating nutrient-efficient cultivars with targeted PGPs especially micronutrient formulations and GA 3 offers a low-cost, sustainable pathway to enhance physiological resilience and optimize wheat performance in water-limited and heat-stressed agro-ecosystems. • DBW-187 + PGP6 increased yield to 5.38 t ha -1 (+24.1% over control). • Micronutrient chelates raised tiller count by 36% and dry matter by 33%. • DBW-187 recorded +19.7% tiller rate and +9.5% stomatal conductance. • GA 3 treatment enhanced grain yield by 12.8–19.4% across cultivars. • Cultivar–PGP synergy improved LAI (+11.6%) and photosynthetic efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DBW-187 had 18.3% higher tiller number.

Material
DBW-187e0
Outcome
tiller numbere0
Direction
highere0
Value
+18.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DBW-187 showing superior growth and physiological traits such as higher tiller number (+18.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–804 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DBW-187 had 19.7% higher tiller production rate.

Material
DBW-187e0
Outcome
tiller production ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
+19.7%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DBW-187 showing superior growth and physiological traits such as higher tiller number (+18.3%), tiller production rate (+19.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–837 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DBW-187 had 18.3% greater dry matter accumulation.

Material
DBW-187e0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
+18.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DBW-187 showing superior growth and physiological traits such as higher tiller number (+18.3%), tiller production rate (+19.7%), dry matter accumulation (+18.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DBW-187 improved SPAD and NDVI measures.

Material
DBW-187e1
Outcome
SPAD, NDVIe0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved SPAD, NDVI, and stomatal conductance (+9.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–930 · show in text ↑
e1

“DBW-187 showing superior growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DBW-187 improved stomatal conductance by 9.5%.

Material
DBW-187e1
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
improvede0
Value
+9.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved SPAD, NDVI, and stomatal conductance (+9.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–930 · show in text ↑
e1

“DBW-187 showing superior growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient chelates increased tiller production by 36.0% to 50.5%.

Treatment
Micronutrient chelates (PGP6)e0
Outcome
tiller productione0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
+36.0% to +50.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrient chelates (PGP6) emerged as the most effective promoter, enhancing tiller production (+36.0% to +50.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient chelates increased dry matter accumulation by 33.4%.

Treatment
Micronutrient chelates (PGP6)e0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
+33.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrient chelates (PGP6) emerged as the most effective promoter, enhancing tiller production (+36.0% to +50.5%), dry matter accumulation (+33.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient chelates increased leaf area index by 11.6%.

Treatment
Micronutrient chelates (PGP6)e0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
+11.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrient chelates (PGP6) emerged as the most effective promoter, enhancing tiller production (+36.0% to +50.5%), dry matter accumulation (+33.4%), leaf area index (+11.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient chelates enhanced pigment concentrations.

Treatment
Micronutrient chelates (PGP6)e0
Outcome
pigment concentrationse0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronutrient chelates (PGP6) emerged as the most effective promoter, enhancing tiller production (+36.0% to +50.5%), dry matter accumulation (+33.4%), leaf area index (+11.6%), and pigment concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DBW-187 with PGP6 yielded 5.38 t ha -1.

Material
DBW-187e0
Treatment
PGP 6e0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5.38 t ha -1e0
Qualifier
∼24%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The DBW-187 + PGP 6 combination achieved the highest productivity (5.38 t ha -1 ), representing a ∼24% yield increase over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1341 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA 3 increased grain yield by 12.8–19.4% across cultivars.

Treatment
GA 3 treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
12.8–19.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA 3 treatment enhanced grain yield by 12.8–19.4% across cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1916–1983 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 30 positive, 5 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

micronutrient · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

micronutrient · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 71 positive, 7 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

74 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.