Abstract
The effects of nanometer synergistic fertilizer on the growth,economic characters and quality of flue-cured tobacco were investigated on cv.Zhongyan 100 by field experiment.The results showed that: 1) at prophase and metaphase,growth of tobacco was obviously promoted by nanometer synergistic fertilizer,it raised the output and value of cured leaves relatively.2) The potassium content and the ratio of potassium to chloride in leaf were obviously increased,the increase of potassium content was up to 50%.3) The chemical components in leaf were relatively harmonious when the total amount of fertilizer reduced by 30% and 50%,and not significantly differed from the control.4) The smoking quality of tobacco leaf was improved by nanometer synergistic fertilizer to a certain extent,especially in aromatic quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Nanometer synergistic fertilizer promoted tobacco growth at prophase and metaphase.
- Taxon
- tobacco
Nicotiana tabacume0 - Organ / stage
- prophase and metaphasee0
- Treatment
- nanometer synergistic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- growth of tobaccoe0
- Direction
- promotede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“at prophase and metaphase,growth of tobacco was obviously promoted by nanometer synergistic fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanometer synergistic fertilizer raised the output and value of cured tobacco leaves.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume1
- Treatment
- nanometer synergistic fertilizere1
- Outcome
- output and value of cured leavese0
- Direction
- raisede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it raised the output and value of cured leaves relatively.”
e1“growth of tobacco was obviously promoted by nanometer synergistic fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanometer synergistic fertilizer increased tobacco leaf potassium content by up to 50%.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume1
- Organ / stage
- leafe0
- Treatment
- nanometer synergistic fertilizere1
- Outcome
- potassium contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 50%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The potassium content and the ratio of potassium to chloride in leaf were obviously increased,the increase of potassium content was up to 50%.”
e1“growth of tobacco was obviously promoted by nanometer synergistic fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanometer synergistic fertilizer increased the tobacco leaf potassium to chloride ratio.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume1
- Treatment
- nanometer synergistic fertilizere1
- Outcome
- ratio of potassium to chloride in leafe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The potassium content and the ratio of potassium to chloride in leaf were obviously increased”
e1“growth of tobacco was obviously promoted by nanometer synergistic fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
With total fertilizer reduced by 30%, tobacco leaf chemical components remained relatively harmonious and did not differ significantly from the control.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume1
- Treatment
- total amount of fertilizer reduced by 30%e0
- Outcome
- chemical components in leafe0
- Direction
- not significantly differede0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chemical components in leaf were relatively harmonious when the total amount of fertilizer reduced by 30% and 50%,and not significantly differed from the control.”
e1“growth of tobacco was obviously promoted by nanometer synergistic fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
With total fertilizer reduced by 50%, tobacco leaf chemical components remained relatively harmonious and did not differ significantly from the control.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume1
- Treatment
- total amount of fertilizer reduced by 30% and 50%e0
- Outcome
- chemical components in leafe0
- Direction
- not significantly differede0
- Qualifier
- 50%e0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The chemical components in leaf were relatively harmonious when the total amount of fertilizer reduced by 30% and 50%,and not significantly differed from the control.”
e1“growth of tobacco was obviously promoted by nanometer synergistic fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanometer synergistic fertilizer improved tobacco leaf smoking quality, especially aromatic quality.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume0
- Treatment
- nanometer synergistic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- smoking quality of tobacco leafe0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Qualifier
- to a certain extent,especially in aromatic qualitye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The smoking quality of tobacco leaf was improved by nanometer synergistic fertilizer to a certain extent,especially in aromatic quality.”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results differ
71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nanoparticle · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →fertilization · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
135 papers more in this group
See all 139 papers →fertilization · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
153 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
178 papers more in this group
See all 182 papers →fertilization · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results
186 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
210 papers more in this group
See all 214 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.