Paper · 1975 · Agronomy Journal

Growth of Young Tobacco Plants as Affected by Carbon Dioxide and Nutrient Variables1

Judith F. Thomas; C. David Raper; C. E. Anderson; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Tobacco ( Nicotiana tabacum L.), essentially a nursery plant during seedling growth, is grown in a protected plant bed until it attains the size to be transplanted into the field. Enchancement of growth rates during seedling culture would have advantages in production of tobacco seedlings, as well as bedding plants. Enrichment of atmospheric CO 2 is a generally recognized technique of increasing growth rates. Experiments were conducted in controlled‐environment chambers to evaluate the immediate effects of CO 2 enrichment on seedling growth of tobacco, the carryover effects to post‐transplant growth, and nutritional requirements for maximum response to CO 2 enrichment. Tobacco seedlings were grown at two rates of nutrient application in atmospheres containing either ambient (400 ppm) or enriched (1,000 ppm) CO 2 levels. At the time of transplanting half of the plants from each CO 2 environment were reciprocally exchanged. During seedling culture, Relative Growth Rate (RGR) was enhanced CO 2 enrichment but was depressed by the higher nutrient application rate. The RGR to CO 2 enrichment was reversed during post‐transplant culture. For either CO 2 environment, RGR during seedling growth was nearly three‐fold RGR during posttransplant culture. The reduction in RGR with CO 2 enrichment occurred for both a 9‐hour and a 15‐hour light period of 450 hectolux intensity. The lower RGR for CO 2 enrichment during post‐transplant culture was associated with increased starch in leaf tissues. These data support the hypothesis that, although growth response may temporarily be enhanced by CO 2 enrichment, it must decline to a level similar to that of plants raised under ambient CO 2 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment enhanced seedling relative growth rate.

Treatment
enriched (1,000 ppm) CO 2e1
Outcome
Relative Growth Rate (RGR)e0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
ambient (400 ppm)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During seedling culture, Relative Growth Rate (RGR) was enhanced CO 2 enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1025 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tobacco seedlings were grown at two rates of nutrient application in atmospheres containing either ambient (400 ppm) or enriched (1,000 ppm) CO 2 levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nutrient application depressed seedling relative growth rate.

Treatment
higher nutrient application ratee0
Outcome
Relative Growth Rate (RGR)e0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative Growth Rate (RGR) was enhanced CO 2 enrichment but was depressed by the higher nutrient application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1083 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tobacco seedlings were grown at two rates of nutrient application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–752 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth-rate response to CO2 enrichment reversed after transplanting.

Organ / stage
post‐transplant culturee0
Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
RGRe0
Direction
reversede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RGR to CO 2 enrichment was reversed during post‐transplant culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–30 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedling RGR was nearly threefold post-transplant RGR in either CO2 environment.

Outcome
RGR during seedling growthe0
Value
nearly three‐folde0
Comparator
RGR during posttransplant culturee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For either CO 2 environment, RGR during seedling growth was nearly three‐fold RGR during posttransplant culture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment reduced post-transplant RGR under a 9-hour light period.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
RGRe0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
9‐houre0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in RGR with CO 2 enrichment occurred for both a 9‐hour and a 15‐hour light period of 450 hectolux intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment reduced post-transplant RGR under a 15-hour light period.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
RGRe0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
15‐houre0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reduction in RGR with CO 2 enrichment occurred for both a 9‐hour and a 15‐hour light period of 450 hectolux intensity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1392 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–30 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower post-transplant RGR after CO2 enrichment was associated with more leaf starch.

Organ / stage
leaf tissuese0
Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Compound
starche0
Outcome
RGRe0
Direction
lowere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower RGR for CO 2 enrichment during post‐transplant culture was associated with increased starch in leaf tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–30 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that the temporary growth benefit from CO2 enrichment must decline toward ambient-grown plants.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
growth responsee0
Direction
declinee0
Comparator
plants raised under ambient CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although growth response may temporarily be enhanced by CO 2 enrichment, it must decline to a level similar to that of plants raised under ambient CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1552–1703 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tobacco Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–30 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · growth · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

182 papers: 154 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 154 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

178 papers more in this group

See all 182 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.