Paper · 2006 · Hubei nongye kexue

Effect of the Preparation of Insecticide and Bio-fertilizer on Cotton

Shuang-Feng Zhang

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The results of this study indicated that applying 7500mL·hm-2 the preparation of insecticide and biofertilizer to cotton could promote the nutritional and reproductive growth of cotton,increase the yield of cotton and had good insecticidal effect to cotton aphis and bollworm.Compared with the contrast,the number of branches increased by 1.1,the number of summer bolls increased by 0.9,the number of autum bolls increased by 1.1,the weight of sigle boll increased by 0.5g,the length of fibre increased by 0.3cm,the out turn increased by 6.0%,the yield of cotton increased by 21.8%,the death rate of aphis and bollworm was 100% and 97% respectively.The yield of cotton applying the preparation of insecticide and fertilizer increases significantly than that of other treatments by LSD analysis.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The preparation increased cotton branch number by 1.1 versus the contrast.

Treatment
applying 7500mL·hm-2 the preparation of insecticide and biofertilizere0
Outcome
number of branchese0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.1e0
Comparator
the contraste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 7500mL·hm-2 the preparation of insecticide and biofertilizer to cotton could promote the nutritional and reproductive growth of cotton,increase the yield of cotton and had good insecticidal effect to cotton aphis and bollworm.Compared with the contrast,the number of branches increased by 1.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Summer bolls increased by 0.9.

Treatment
preparation of insecticide and biofertilizere0t0e1
Outcome
number of summer bollse0t0e1
Direction
increasede0t0e1
Value
0.9e0t0e1
Comparator
the contraste0t0e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the contrast,the number of branches increased by 1.1,the number of summer bolls increased by 0.9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–386 · show in text ↑
t0

“Preparation of Insecticide and Bio-fertilizer on Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying 7500mL·hm-2 the preparation of insecticide and biofertilizer to cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Autumn bolls increased by 1.1.

Treatment
preparation of insecticide and biofertilizere0t0e1
Outcome
number of autum bollse0t0e1
Direction
increasede0t0e1
Value
1.1e0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of autum bolls increased by 1.1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–429 · show in text ↑
t0

“Preparation of Insecticide and Bio-fertilizer on Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying 7500mL·hm-2 the preparation of insecticide and biofertilizer to cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single boll weight increased by 0.5 g.

Treatment
preparation of insecticide and biofertilizere0t0e1
Outcome
weight of sigle bolle0t0e1
Direction
increasede0t0e1
Value
0.5ge0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the weight of sigle boll increased by 0.5g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–472 · show in text ↑
t0

“Preparation of Insecticide and Bio-fertilizer on Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying 7500mL·hm-2 the preparation of insecticide and biofertilizer to cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fibre length increased by 0.3 cm.

Treatment
preparation of insecticide and biofertilizere0t0e1
Outcome
length of fibree0t0e1
Direction
increasede0t0e1
Value
0.3cme0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the length of fibre increased by 0.3cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Preparation of Insecticide and Bio-fertilizer on Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying 7500mL·hm-2 the preparation of insecticide and biofertilizer to cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Out turn increased by 6.0%.

Treatment
preparation of insecticide and biofertilizere0t0e1
Outcome
out turne0t0e1
Direction
increasede0t0e1
Value
6.0%e0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the out turn increased by 6.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–542 · show in text ↑
t0

“Preparation of Insecticide and Bio-fertilizer on Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying 7500mL·hm-2 the preparation of insecticide and biofertilizer to cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield increased by 21.8%.

Treatment
preparation of insecticide and biofertilizere0t0e1
Outcome
yield of cottone0t0e1
Direction
increasede0t0e1
Value
21.8%e0t0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the yield of cotton increased by 21.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 543–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Preparation of Insecticide and Bio-fertilizer on Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying 7500mL·hm-2 the preparation of insecticide and biofertilizer to cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The preparation caused 100% aphis mortality.

Treatment
preparation of insecticide and biofertilizere0t0e1
Interactor
aphisAphise0t0e1pest
Outcome
death rate of aphise0t0e1
Value
100%e0t0e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis
Aphis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKenraiz Krzysztof Ziarnek · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the death rate of aphis and bollworm was 100% and 97% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Preparation of Insecticide and Bio-fertilizer on Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying 7500mL·hm-2 the preparation of insecticide and biofertilizer to cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The preparation caused 97% bollworm mortality.

Treatment
preparation of insecticide and biofertilizere0t0e1
Interactor
bollwormHelicoverpa zeae0t0e1pest
Outcome
death rate of aphis and bollworme0t0e1
Value
97%e0t0e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the death rate of aphis and bollworm was 100% and 97% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Preparation of Insecticide and Bio-fertilizer on Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–69 · show in text ↑
e1

“applying 7500mL·hm-2 the preparation of insecticide and biofertilizer to cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 41–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield under the preparation was significantly greater than under other treatments.

Treatment
preparation of insecticide and fertilizere0
Outcome
yield of cottone0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The yield of cotton applying the preparation of insecticide and fertilizer increases significantly than that of other treatments by LSD analysis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–793 · show in text ↑

insecticide · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
    Lint yield did not differ significantly among the insecticide PGR treatments in cotton.

    Evaluation of PGR properties of TRIMAX in cotton · 2005 · compared with among any of the insecticide PGR treatments

    No difference from an alternative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

insecticide · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

76 papers: 59 positive, 17 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

inoculation · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

insecticide · Helicoverpa zea · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 46 positive, 4 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.