Paper · 2005 · The Plant Pathology Journal

Effect of Cotton Leaf Mosaic Disease on Morphology, Yield and Fibre Characteristics of Upland Cotton in Pakistan

Khalid P. Akhtar; M.A. Haq; Wajid Ishaque; et al.

15
claims
35
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The effect of cotton leaf mosaic disease on morphology, yield and fibre characteristics was examined for a susceptible cotton candidate variety CRIS-168. Plants inoculated at most susceptible growth stage (six week) under screen house showed severe mosaic symptoms. There was a significant reduction in plant height and yield. Cotton leaf mosaic disease was found to produce severe effects on plant morphology with 24.1% reduction in plant height, 25% in internode length and 37.5% in number of sympodia on main stem. However no changes were observed against number of monopodial branches per plant. Inoculated plants showed 82% decrease in yield/plant, 80% in number of boll set/ plant, 12.1% in boll weight, 12.8% in lint weight, 10.8% in seed weight, and 6.8% in seed index. Cotton leaf mosaic disease also showed effects on fibre characteristics with 0.8% decrease in GOT and 1.6% in fibre length. In contrast, uniformity ratio, fibre fineness and maturity index was increased by 20.5%, 14.4% and 0.9%, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

plant height was reduced by 24.1% with cotton leaf mosaic disease.

Material
CRIS-168e1
Treatment
Cotton leaf mosaic diseasee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
reductione0
Value
24.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton leaf mosaic disease was found to produce severe effects on plant morphology with 24.1% reduction in plant height, 25% in internode length and 37.5% in number of sympodia on main stem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton candidate variety CRIS-168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

internode length was reduced by 25% with cotton leaf mosaic disease.

Material
CRIS-168e1
Treatment
Cotton leaf mosaic diseasee0
Outcome
internode lengthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton leaf mosaic disease was found to produce severe effects on plant morphology with 24.1% reduction in plant height, 25% in internode length and 37.5% in number of sympodia on main stem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton candidate variety CRIS-168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

number of sympodia on main stem was reduced by 37.5% with cotton leaf mosaic disease.

Material
CRIS-168e1
Treatment
Cotton leaf mosaic diseasee0
Outcome
number of sympodia on main steme0
Direction
reductione0
Value
37.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton leaf mosaic disease was found to produce severe effects on plant morphology with 24.1% reduction in plant height, 25% in internode length and 37.5% in number of sympodia on main stem.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton candidate variety CRIS-168”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–152 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The number of monopodial branches per plant did not change.

Treatment
Cotton leaf mosaic diseasee1
Outcome
number of monopodial branches per plante0
Direction
no changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However no changes were observed against number of monopodial branches per plant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 518–599 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“cotton leaf mosaic disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cotton had a 82% decrease in yield/plant.

Treatment
Inoculatede0
Outcome
yield/plante0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
82%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants showed 82% decrease in yield/plant, 80% in number of boll set/ plant, 12.1% in boll weight, 12.8% in lint weight, 10.8% in seed weight, and 6.8% in seed index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cotton had a 80% decrease in number of boll set/ plant.

Treatment
Inoculatede0
Outcome
number of boll set/ plante0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants showed 82% decrease in yield/plant, 80% in number of boll set/ plant, 12.1% in boll weight, 12.8% in lint weight, 10.8% in seed weight, and 6.8% in seed index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cotton had a 12.1% decrease in boll weight.

Treatment
Inoculatede0
Outcome
boll weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
12.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants showed 82% decrease in yield/plant, 80% in number of boll set/ plant, 12.1% in boll weight, 12.8% in lint weight, 10.8% in seed weight, and 6.8% in seed index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cotton had a 12.8% decrease in lint weight.

Treatment
Inoculatede0
Outcome
lint weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
12.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants showed 82% decrease in yield/plant, 80% in number of boll set/ plant, 12.1% in boll weight, 12.8% in lint weight, 10.8% in seed weight, and 6.8% in seed index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cotton had a 10.8% decrease in seed weight.

Treatment
Inoculatede0
Outcome
seed weighte0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
10.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants showed 82% decrease in yield/plant, 80% in number of boll set/ plant, 12.1% in boll weight, 12.8% in lint weight, 10.8% in seed weight, and 6.8% in seed index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated cotton had a 6.8% decrease in seed index.

Treatment
Inoculatede0
Outcome
seed indexe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
6.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculated plants showed 82% decrease in yield/plant, 80% in number of boll set/ plant, 12.1% in boll weight, 12.8% in lint weight, 10.8% in seed weight, and 6.8% in seed index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–777 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GOT decreased by 0.8% with cotton leaf mosaic disease.

Treatment
Cotton leaf mosaic diseasee0
Outcome
GOTe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
0.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton leaf mosaic disease also showed effects on fibre characteristics with 0.8% decrease in GOT and 1.6% in fibre length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fibre length decreased by 1.6% with cotton leaf mosaic disease.

Treatment
Cotton leaf mosaic diseasee0
Outcome
fibre lengthe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
1.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton leaf mosaic disease also showed effects on fibre characteristics with 0.8% decrease in GOT and 1.6% in fibre length.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–901 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

uniformity ratio increased by 20.5%.

Treatment
Cotton leaf mosaic diseasee1
Outcome
uniformity ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, uniformity ratio, fibre fineness and maturity index was increased by 20.5%, 14.4% and 0.9%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of cotton leaf mosaic disease on morphology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

fibre fineness increased by 14.4%.

Treatment
Cotton leaf mosaic diseasee1
Outcome
fibre finenesse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
14.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, uniformity ratio, fibre fineness and maturity index was increased by 20.5%, 14.4% and 0.9%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of cotton leaf mosaic disease on morphology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

maturity index increased by 0.9%.

Treatment
Cotton leaf mosaic diseasee1
Outcome
maturity indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In contrast, uniformity ratio, fibre fineness and maturity index was increased by 20.5%, 14.4% and 0.9%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1020 · show in text ↑
t0

“Upland Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“The effect of cotton leaf mosaic disease on morphology”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–54 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 46 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.