Paper · 2011 · Shengtai yu nongcun huanjing xuebao

Effect of Enhanced Ultraviolet-B Radiation on Physiological Properties of Different Cultivars of Barley

Kang Han-jin

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to investigate effects of enhanced ultraviolet-B(UV-B) radiation on physiological characteristics,e.g.photosynthesis and transpiration,of different cultivars of barley.The experiment was designed to have two levels of UV-B radiation,i.e.enhanced UV-B(14.4 kJ·m-2·d-1) and ambient UV-B,and conducted at the Agro-Meteorological Station,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Jiangsu Province,China.Results show that enhanced UV-B obviously depressed photosynthesis and transpiration in all the barley cultivars.Compared with control,enhanced UV-B radiation significantly decreased chlorophyll content,stomatic conductance,net photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate,but generally had no effect on intercullular CO2 concentration in the leaves of the plants.However,the plants varied in sensitivity to UV-B radiation from cultivar to cultivar.Cultivar Dan #2 was more sensitive than Cultivar Su #4.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B depressed photosynthesis and transpiration in all barley cultivars.

Treatment
enhanced UV-Be0
Outcome
photosynthesis and transpiratione0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced UV-B obviously depressed photosynthesis and transpiration in all the barley cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–560 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B significantly reduced chlorophyll content and stomatal conductance.

Treatment
enhanced UV-B radiatione0
Outcome
chlorophyll content,stomatic conductancee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with control,enhanced UV-B radiation significantly decreased chlorophyll content,stomatic conductance,net photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Cultivars of Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B significantly reduced net photosynthetic and transpiration rates.

Treatment
enhanced UV-B radiatione0
Outcome
net photosynthetic rate and transpiration ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with control,enhanced UV-B radiation significantly decreased chlorophyll content,stomatic conductance,net photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Cultivars of Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enhanced UV-B generally had no effect on leaf intercellular CO2 concentration.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
enhanced UV-Be1
Outcome
intercullular CO2 concentratione0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“generally had no effect on intercullular CO2 concentration in the leaves of the plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–808 · show in text ↑
e1

“enhanced UV-B obviously depressed photosynthesis and transpiration in all the barley cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Cultivars of Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dan #2 was more UV-B sensitive than Su #4.

Material
Dan #2e0
Outcome
more sensitivee0
Direction
more sensitivee0
Comparator
Su #4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar Dan #2 was more sensitive than Cultivar Su #4.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Cultivars of Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–103 · show in text ↑

uv · physiology: pigments · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

radiation · physiology: pigments · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

radiation · physiology: photosynthesis · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

uv · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 3 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.