Paper · 2014 · Science and Technology of Food Industry

Effect of nanocomposite-based packaging on the postharvest quality of citrus fruit

Xie Shu-hu

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Based on the pre- test results,LDPE bags contained 1% inorganic antimicrobial agent( the main component of the nano- Ag,nano- Zn and kaolin) was suitable for the package of citrus fruit. The physical properties of the bag were analyzed.Meanwhile,the changes of quality and artificial inoculated disease on citrus fruit were studied.The results showed that the oxygen permeability and water vapor transmission rate of the nano- packaging material were reduced,and the tear strength was increased.The nano packaging could not influence the color of fruits,however,it could significantly inhibited the declining of fruit firmness and titratable acid and the increasing of weight loss,reduced the development of the artificial disease and postharvest loss.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano packaging did not affect citrus fruit color.

Taxon
citrus fruitCitrust0
Treatment
nano packaginge0
Outcome
color of fruitse0
Direction
could not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“citrus fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“The nano packaging could not influence the color of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano packaging significantly inhibited declining fruit firmness and titratable acid.

Taxon
citrus fruitCitrust0
Treatment
nano packaginge0
Outcome
fruit firmness and titratable acide0
Direction
inhibited the declininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“citrus fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“The nano packaging could not influence the color of fruits,however,it could significantly inhibited the declining of fruit firmness and titratable acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–646 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano packaging inhibited increasing citrus fruit weight loss.

Taxon
citrus fruitCitrust0
Treatment
nano packaginge0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
inhibited the declininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“citrus fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“The nano packaging could not influence the color of fruits,however,it could significantly inhibited the declining of fruit firmness and titratable acid and the increasing of weight loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–680 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano packaging reduced development of artificially inoculated citrus disease.

Taxon
citrus fruitCitrust0
Treatment
nano packaginge1
Outcome
development of the artificial diseasee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“citrus fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“reduced the development of the artificial disease and postharvest loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–752 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nano packaging could not influence the color of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano packaging reduced citrus postharvest loss.

Taxon
citrus fruitCitrust0
Treatment
nano packaginge1
Outcome
postharvest losse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrus
Citrus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ellen Levy Finch ( Elf ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“citrus fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–82 · show in text ↑
e0

“reduced the development of the artificial disease and postharvest loss.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–752 · show in text ↑
e1

“The nano packaging could not influence the color of fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–553 · show in text ↑

storage · growth · CitrusPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

storage · quality: postharvest · CitrusPositive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: postharvest · CitrusResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · CitrusResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.