Paper · 2006 · Guoshu xuebao

Suitable fungicides and their combination for control of apple fruit canker disease (Physalospora piricola)

MA Huai-yao

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

s: In order to solve the suitable fungicides for control of apple fruit canker disease, experiment of screening fungicides and their application formula were conducted with Fuji apple cultivar. Results showed that spraying the solution of 5° lime-sulphur mixture + silica powder in ratio of 100 : 4 or 100 : 6 twice a year could get it well controlled. Before first spraying the bark should be scraped lightly. Alternative application of Carbendazim and Bordeaux mixture, Carbendazim and lime-sulphur mixture + silica powder could effectively prevent fruit infected by Physalospora piricola during picking time and in storage. Bagging could prevent the infection of Physalospora piricola by 100%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying lime-sulphur plus silica at 100 : 4 twice yearly controlled apple canker.

Treatment
5° lime-sulphur mixture + silica powdere0
Interactor
Physalospora piricolat0pathogen
Outcome
apple fruit canker diseaset0
Direction
well controllede0
Qualifier
100 : 4e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that spraying the solution of 5° lime-sulphur mixture + silica powder in ratio of 100 : 4 or 100 : 6 twice a year could get it well controlled.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–352 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruit canker disease (Physalospora piricola)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying lime-sulphur plus silica at 100 : 6 twice yearly controlled apple canker.

Treatment
5° lime-sulphur mixture + silica powdere0
Interactor
Physalospora piricolat0pathogen
Outcome
apple fruit canker diseaset0
Direction
well controllede0
Qualifier
100 : 6e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that spraying the solution of 5° lime-sulphur mixture + silica powder in ratio of 100 : 4 or 100 : 6 twice a year could get it well controlled.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–352 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple fruit canker disease (Physalospora piricola)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–107 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The bark should be scraped lightly before the first spray.

Outcome
the bark should be scraped lightlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Before first spraying the bark should be scraped lightly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–410 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternating Carbendazim and Bordeaux mixture prevented infection during picking and storage.

Treatment
Carbendazim and Bordeaux mixturee0
Interactor
Physalospora piricolae0pathogen
Outcome
fruit infected by Physalospora piricolae0
Direction
prevente0
Qualifier
during picking time and in storagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alternative application of Carbendazim and Bordeaux mixture, Carbendazim and lime-sulphur mixture + silica powder could effectively prevent fruit infected by Physalospora piricola during picking time and in storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternating Carbendazim and lime-sulphur plus silica prevented infection during picking and storage.

Treatment
Carbendazim and lime-sulphur mixture + silica powdere0
Interactor
Physalospora piricolae0pathogen
Outcome
fruit infected by Physalospora piricolae0
Direction
prevente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alternative application of Carbendazim and Bordeaux mixture, Carbendazim and lime-sulphur mixture + silica powder could effectively prevent fruit infected by Physalospora piricola during picking time and in storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bagging prevented infection by 100%.

Treatment
Bagginge0
Interactor
Physalospora piricolae0pathogen
Outcome
infection of Physalospora piricolae0
Direction
prevente0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bagging could prevent the infection of Physalospora piricola by 100%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑

carbendazim · organism · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

silicon dioxide · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

lime · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

botanical · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 36 positive, 3 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

trap barrier · organism · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.