Paper · 2015

Effects of Interactions between Irrigation and Sulphur on Physiological and Biochemical Indices and Chemical Components in Flue-Cured Tobacco

Zhang Ya-ji

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of interactions between irrigation times in fast growing stage and sulphur levels on physiological and biochemical indices and chemical components in flue-cured tobacco were studied under field experiment conditions,with the treatments of irrigation times(three levels)and sulphur supply(three levels).The results indicated that the SPAD values of flue-cured tobacco leaves were improved with the increasing rate of sulphur;the NR activity and proline contents of 2.0g per plant were higher than those of other treatments,while both sulphur deficiency and sulphur surplus inhibited the NR activity and proline contents;the MDA content of tabacco leaves reflected an upward trend in the whole growth period and reached the peak at maturing stage;both sulphur deficiency and sulphur surplus increased the MDA content of tabacco leaves with the increase of membrane permeability;potassium content,the nicotine and reducing sugar quantity were increased with the adding sulphur supply in a certain range;single irrigation times and sulphur levels had no remarkable effects on sulphur content of tobacco leaves,while their interaction effect reached highly significant level;appropriate sulphur supply(2.0g per plant)coordinated with reasonable irrigation times(2times in fast growing stage)could significantly increase the internal quality of tabacco leaves.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulphur improved SPAD values in tobacco leaves.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
increasing rate of sulphure0
Outcome
SPAD valuese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the SPAD values of flue-cured tobacco leaves were improved with the increasing rate of sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.0g per plant sulphur treatment produced higher NR activity than other treatments.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
2.0g per plante0
Outcome
NR activitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“the NR activity and proline contents of 2.0g per plant were higher than those of other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2.0g per plant sulphur treatment produced higher proline content than other treatments.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
2.0g per plante0
Outcome
proline contentse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“the NR activity and proline contents of 2.0g per plant were higher than those of other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both sulphur deficiency and surplus inhibited NR activity.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
sulphur deficiency and sulphur surpluse0
Outcome
NR activitye0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“both sulphur deficiency and sulphur surplus inhibited the NR activity and proline contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both sulphur deficiency and surplus inhibited proline content.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
sulphur deficiency and sulphur surpluse0
Outcome
proline contentse0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“both sulphur deficiency and sulphur surplus inhibited the NR activity and proline contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tobacco leaf MDA content rose through growth and peaked at maturity.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Organ / stage
maturing stagee0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
upward trende0

Verbatim

e0

“the MDA content of tabacco leaves reflected an upward trend in the whole growth period and reached the peak at maturing stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–756 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur deficiency and surplus increased tobacco leaf MDA content.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
sulphur deficiency and sulphur surpluse0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“both sulphur deficiency and sulphur surplus increased the MDA content of tabacco leaves with the increase of membrane permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur deficiency and surplus increased membrane permeability.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
sulphur deficiency and sulphur surpluse0
Outcome
membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“both sulphur deficiency and sulphur surplus increased the MDA content of tabacco leaves with the increase of membrane permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulphur within a range increased leaf potassium content.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
adding sulphur supplye0
Outcome
potassium contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a certain rangee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“potassium content,the nicotine and reducing sugar quantity were increased with the adding sulphur supply in a certain range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulphur within a range increased leaf nicotine.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
adding sulphur supplye0
Outcome
nicotinee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a certain rangee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“potassium content,the nicotine and reducing sugar quantity were increased with the adding sulphur supply in a certain range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulphur within a range increased reducing sugar quantity.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
adding sulphur supplye0
Outcome
reducing sugar quantitye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in a certain rangee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“potassium content,the nicotine and reducing sugar quantity were increased with the adding sulphur supply in a certain range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1011 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation times alone did not remarkably affect leaf sulphur content.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
single irrigation timese0
Outcome
sulphur contente0
Direction
no remarkable effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“single irrigation times and sulphur levels had no remarkable effects on sulphur content of tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur level alone did not remarkably affect leaf sulphur content.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
sulphur levelse0
Outcome
sulphur contente0
Direction
no remarkable effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“single irrigation times and sulphur levels had no remarkable effects on sulphur content of tobacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The irrigation by sulphur interaction significantly affected leaf sulphur content.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
interaction effecte0
Outcome
interaction effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“while their interaction effect reached highly significant level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 2.0g per plant with two irrigations significantly improved tobacco leaf internal quality.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccot0
Treatment
sulphur supply(2.0g per plant)coordinated with reasonable irrigation times(2times in fast growing stage)e0
Outcome
internal qualitye0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“appropriate sulphur supply(2.0g per plant)coordinated with reasonable irrigation times(2times in fast growing stage)could significantly increase the internal quality of tabacco leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“Flue-Cured Tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–141 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · physiology: oxidative · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

sulfur atom · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sulfur atom · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfur atom · physiology: pigments · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

irrigation · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.