Paper · 2011 · Acta Ecologica Sinica

Effect of sulfur on chlorophyll fluorescence of flue-cured tobacco at maturation stage

Zhang Guo

18
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A hydroponic experiment was carried out to study the effects of different concentrations of sulfur(0.01—32 mmol/L) on chlorophyll contents and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage.Chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contents of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage gradually increased with increasing concentrations of sulfur,but differences among the treatments were not significant.Chlorophyll a/b values of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage had no regular change but chlorophyll a/b values in the 0.01—8 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur were slightly higher than those in the 16 and 32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur.As the sulfur concentration increasing from 2 to 32 mmol/L,there were decreases in the effective quantum yield(EQY),the maximum quantum yield of PSⅡ photochemistry in the dark-adapted state(Fv/Fm),and the photosynthetic electron transport rate(ETR) of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage,but increases in nonphotochemical quenching(NPQ),basal quantum yield of nonphotochemical quenching(Fo/Fm),PSⅡ water-splitting apparatus inactivation(Fo/Fv),and the degree of reaction center closure(1-qP).The plastoquinone pool(Fv/2) of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 2 mmol/L concentration of sulfur was lower than that in the 4 mmol/L concentration of sulfur but higher than those in the 8—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur.The curves of Fv/2 of flue-cured tobacco in 8—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur were almostly overlapped.The EQY,and ETR of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfur were lower than those in the 2—8 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur,but higher than those in the 16—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur.The Fv/Fm of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfur was lower than those in the 2-4 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur but higer than that in the 32 mmol/L concentration of sulfur.There were not significantly different in the Fv/Fm among the 0.01,8 and 16 mmol/L concentration of sulfur.The curves of 1-qP,Fo/Fm and Fo/Fv of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfur were intertvined with 8 and 16 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur and higher than those in the 2—4 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur but lower than those in the 32 mmol/L concentration of sulfur.The NPQ of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfur were significantly higher than those in the 2—4 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur.Similarly,the NPQ in the 0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfur was higer than those in the 8—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur at photosynthetic active radiation(PAR) range 0—500 μmol · m-2 · s-1 but lower than those in 8 and 16mmol/L concentrations of sulfur at photosynthetic active radiation over 500μmol · m-2 · s-1.The Fv/2 of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur was lower than that in the 4 mmol/L concentration of sulfur,but higher than those in the 2 mmol/L and the 8—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur.These results suggested that the decreases in the EQY,Fv/Fm,and ETR of flue-cured leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur did not result from a decreased plastoquinone pool,but from an increase in the degree of reaction center closure.In the 16—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur,the decreases in EQY,Fv/Fm,and ETR resulted from a combination of increased degree of reaction center closure and a decreased plastoquinone pool.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a and b contents rose with increasing sulfur, although differences were not significant.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Organ / stage
leaves at maturation stagee0
Treatment
increasing concentrations of sulfure0
Outcome
Chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contents of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage gradually increased with increasing concentrations of sulfur,but differences among the treatments were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a/b values showed no regular response to sulfur.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Organ / stage
leaves at maturation stagee0
Treatment
sulfure1
Outcome
Chlorophyll a/b valuese0
Direction
no regular changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a/b values of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage had no regular change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–530 · show in text ↑
e1

“sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–16 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a/b was slightly higher at 0.01–8 than at 16 and 32 mmol/L sulfur.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe1
Treatment
0.01—8 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0
Outcome
chlorophyll a/b valuese0
Direction
slightly highere0
Comparator
16 and 32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll a/b values in the 0.01—8 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur were slightly higher than those in the 16 and 32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–684 · show in text ↑
e1

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulfur from 2 to 32 mmol/L decreased effective quantum yield, Fv/Fm and electron transport rate.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
sulfur concentration increasing from 2 to 32 mmol/Le0
Outcome
effective quantum yield(EQY),the maximum quantum yield of PSⅡ photochemistry in the dark-adapted state(Fv/Fm),and the photosynthetic electron transport rate(ETR)e0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“As the sulfur concentration increasing from 2 to 32 mmol/L,there were decreases in the effective quantum yield(EQY),the maximum quantum yield of PSⅡ photochemistry in the dark-adapted state(Fv/Fm),and the photosynthetic electron transport rate(ETR) of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulfur from 2 to 32 mmol/L increased NPQ, Fo/Fm and Fo/Fv.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
sulfur concentration increasing from 2 to 32 mmol/Le0
Outcome
nonphotochemical quenching(NPQ),basal quantum yield of nonphotochemical quenching(Fo/Fm),PSⅡ water-splitting apparatus inactivation(Fo/Fv)e0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“As the sulfur concentration increasing from 2 to 32 mmol/L,there were decreases in the effective quantum yield(EQY),the maximum quantum yield of PSⅡ photochemistry in the dark-adapted state(Fv/Fm),and the photosynthetic electron transport rate(ETR) of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage,but increases in nonphotochemical quenching(NPQ),basal quantum yield of nonphotochemical quenching(Fo/Fm),PSⅡ water-splitting apparatus inactivation(Fo/Fv),and the degree of reaction center closure(1-qP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing sulfur from 2 to 32 mmol/L increased reaction center closure.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
sulfur concentration increasing from 2 to 32 mmol/Le0
Outcome
degree of reaction center closure(1-qP)e0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“As the sulfur concentration increasing from 2 to 32 mmol/L,there were decreases in the effective quantum yield(EQY),the maximum quantum yield of PSⅡ photochemistry in the dark-adapted state(Fv/Fm),and the photosynthetic electron transport rate(ETR) of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage,but increases in nonphotochemical quenching(NPQ),basal quantum yield of nonphotochemical quenching(Fo/Fm),PSⅡ water-splitting apparatus inactivation(Fo/Fv),and the degree of reaction center closure(1-qP)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–1186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2 mmol/L sulfur, the plastoquinone pool was lower than at 4 mmol/L but higher than at 8–32 mmol/L.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
2 mmol/L concentration of sulfure0
Outcome
plastoquinone pool(Fv/2)e0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
higher than those in the 8—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0
Comparator
4 mmol/L concentration of sulfure0

Verbatim

e0

“The plastoquinone pool(Fv/2) of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 2 mmol/L concentration of sulfur was lower than that in the 4 mmol/L concentration of sulfur but higher than those in the 8—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1430 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastoquinone pool curves at 8–32 mmol/L sulfur nearly overlapped.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
8—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0
Outcome
curves of Fv/2e0
Direction
almostly overlappede0

Verbatim

e0

“The curves of Fv/2 of flue-cured tobacco in 8—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur were almostly overlapped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.01 mmol/L sulfur, EQY and ETR were lower than at 2–8 but higher than at 16–32 mmol/L.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfure0
Outcome
EQY,and ETRe0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
higher than those in the 16—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0
Comparator
2—8 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0

Verbatim

e0

“The EQY,and ETR of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfur were lower than those in the 2—8 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur,but higher than those in the 16—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1776 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.01 mmol/L sulfur, Fv/Fm was lower than at 2–4 but higher than at 32 mmol/L.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfure0
Outcome
Fv/Fme0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
higer than that in the 32 mmol/L concentration of sulfure0
Comparator
2-4 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0

Verbatim

e0

“The Fv/Fm of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfur was lower than those in the 2-4 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur but higer than that in the 32 mmol/L concentration of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–2003 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fm did not differ significantly among 0.01, 8 and 16 mmol/L sulfur.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe1
Treatment
0.01,8 and 16 mmol/L concentration of sulfure0
Outcome
Fv/Fme0
Direction
not significantly differente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“There were not significantly different in the Fv/Fm among the 0.01,8 and 16 mmol/L concentration of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2004–2110 · show in text ↑
e1

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.01 mmol/L sulfur, 1-qP, Fo/Fm and Fo/Fv exceeded 2–4 mmol/L but were below 32 mmol/L.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfure0
Outcome
1-qP,Fo/Fm and Fo/Fve0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
lower than those in the 32 mmol/L concentration of sulfure0
Comparator
2—4 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0

Verbatim

e0

“The curves of 1-qP,Fo/Fm and Fo/Fv of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfur were intertvined with 8 and 16 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur and higher than those in the 2—4 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur but lower than those in the 32 mmol/L concentration of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2111–2427 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPQ at 0.01 mmol/L sulfur was significantly higher than at 2–4 mmol/L.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfure0
Outcome
NPQe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
2—4 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0

Verbatim

e0

“The NPQ of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfur were significantly higher than those in the 2—4 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2428–2607 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At PAR 0–500, NPQ at 0.01 mmol/L sulfur exceeded 8–32 mmol/L.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe1
Treatment
0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfure0
Outcome
NPQe0
Direction
higere0
Qualifier
photosynthetic active radiation(PAR) range 0—500 μmol · m-2 · s-1e0
Comparator
8—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0

Verbatim

e0

“the NPQ in the 0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfur was higer than those in the 8—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur at photosynthetic active radiation(PAR) range 0—500 μmol · m-2 · s-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2618–2802 · show in text ↑
e1

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At PAR over 500, NPQ at 0.01 mmol/L sulfur was lower than at 8 and 16 mmol/L.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe1
Treatment
0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfure1
Outcome
NPQe1
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
photosynthetic active radiation over 500μmol · m-2 · s-1e0
Comparator
8 and 16mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0

Verbatim

e0

“lower than those in 8 and 16mmol/L concentrations of sulfur at photosynthetic active radiation over 500μmol · m-2 · s-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2807–2926 · show in text ↑
e1

“The NPQ of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentration of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2428–2527 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.01 mmol/L sulfur, Fv/2 was lower than at 4 mmol/L and higher than at 2 and 8–32 mmol/L.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe0
Treatment
0.01 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0
Outcome
Fv/2e0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
higher than those in the 2 mmol/L and the 8—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0
Comparator
4 mmol/L concentration of sulfure0

Verbatim

e0

“The Fv/2 of flue-cured tobacco leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur was lower than that in the 4 mmol/L concentration of sulfur,but higher than those in the 2 mmol/L and the 8—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2927–3171 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute low-sulfur losses of EQY, Fv/Fm and ETR to greater reaction center closure, not a reduced plastoquinone pool.

Taxon
flue-curede0
Treatment
0.01 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0
Outcome
decreases in the EQY,Fv/Fm,and ETRe0
Qualifier
increase in the degree of reaction center closuree0

Verbatim

e0

“the decreases in the EQY,Fv/Fm,and ETR of flue-cured leaves at maturation stage in the 0.01 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur did not result from a decreased plastoquinone pool,but from an increase in the degree of reaction center closure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3201–3437 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute high-sulfur losses of EQY, Fv/Fm and ETR to more reaction center closure and a smaller plastoquinone pool.

Taxon
flue-cured tobaccoe1
Treatment
16—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfure0
Outcome
decreases in EQY,Fv/Fm,and ETRe0
Qualifier
increased degree of reaction center closure and a decreased plastoquinone poole0

Verbatim

e0

“In the 16—32 mmol/L concentrations of sulfur,the decreases in EQY,Fv/Fm,and ETR resulted from a combination of increased degree of reaction center closure and a decreased plastoquinone pool”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3438–3627 · show in text ↑
e1

“flue-cured tobacco”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–66 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · physiology: pigments · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.