Paper · 2016 · Jordan Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Organic Manure, Tipping Dates and Ethephon Sprays on Quality of Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. >

Shawkat Mustafa Al-Atrushy; Awaztaher Haji Barbuhari

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was carried out on a private vineyard located at Bare-Buhar village, Duhok governorate, Kurdistan region, Iraq, during the growing season of 2012- 2013 to investigate the effect of three levels of organic manure (0, 4 and 8 kg.vine-1), three date of Tipping (control, pre-blooming and one month after berries setting) and foliar spraying of three concentration of Ethephon (0, 500 and 1000 ppm), on chemical characteristics of grape cv. Kamali, 8 years old. The results indicated that soil application of organic manure at 8 kg.vine-1, tipping second date and spraying 1000 ppm Ethephon significantly increased Total Soluble Solid (TSS), total sugar and juice percentage and anthocyanin content as compared to control treatment. Whereas the same traits lead to decrease total acidity percentage significantly. The interaction of 8 kg.vine-1+ tipping second date, 8 kg.vine-1 + 1000ppm Ethephon, tipping second date + 1000 ppm Ethephon and the interaction of 8 kg.vine-1+ tipping second date +1000 ppm Ethephon appeared to be the most effected on the chemical quality of grape.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments significantly increased TSS, sugar and juice percentage.

Taxon
Grape (Vitis vinifera L.)Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
soil application of organic manure at 8 kg.vine-1, tipping second date and spraying 1000 ppm Ethephone0
Outcome
Total Soluble Solid (TSS), total sugar and juice percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of organic manure at 8 kg.vine-1, tipping second date and spraying 1000 ppm Ethephon significantly increased Total Soluble Solid (TSS), total sugar and juice percentage and anthocyanin content as compared to control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments significantly increased anthocyanin content.

Taxon
Grape (Vitis vinifera L.)Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
soil application of organic manure at 8 kg.vine-1, tipping second date and spraying 1000 ppm Ethephone0
Outcome
anthocyanin contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of organic manure at 8 kg.vine-1, tipping second date and spraying 1000 ppm Ethephon significantly increased Total Soluble Solid (TSS), total sugar and juice percentage and anthocyanin content as compared to control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–739 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatments significantly decreased total acidity percentage.

Taxon
Grape (Vitis vinifera L.)Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
soil application of organic manure at 8 kg.vine-1, tipping second date and spraying 1000 ppm Ethephone0
Outcome
total acidity percentagee0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of organic manure at 8 kg.vine-1, tipping second date and spraying 1000 ppm Ethephon significantly increased Total Soluble Solid (TSS), total sugar and juice percentage and anthocyanin content as compared to control treatment. Whereas the same traits lead to decrease total acidity percentage significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The manure and tipping interaction had the greatest effect on grape chemical quality.

Taxon
Grape (Vitis vinifera L.)Vitis viniferat0
Treatment
8 kg.vine-1+ tipping second datee0
Outcome
most effected on the chemical quality of grapee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction of 8 kg.vine-1+ tipping second date, 8 kg.vine-1 + 1000ppm Ethephon, tipping second date + 1000 ppm Ethephon and the interaction of 8 kg.vine-1+ tipping second date +1000 ppm Ethephon appeared to be the most effected on the chemical quality of grape.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–1087 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–99 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: sugar starch · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

application · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.