Paper · 2014 · Trends in Biosciences/Trends in biosciences

Weed Management by Cultural and Chemical Practices and their Effect on Phytotoxicity and Growth, Quality and Yield Parameters of Cluster Bean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub)

Piyush Kumar Saras; B.D. Patel; Sejal Parmar

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Anand Agricultural University, Anand to study the different weed management practices for better weed control, phytotoxic effect of herbicides on crop growth and higher quality seed yield of cluster bean. The dominant weed species among monocot weeds was Echinochola crusgalli and in dicot weed species Digera arvensis was observed during the growing season. Total weed dry weight (monocot and dicot weeds) was the lowest in interculteringfb hand weeding carried out at 20 and 40 DAS at 25 and 50 DAS and at harvest. Minimum weed index was observed with the interculteringfb hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS. This treatment also recorded higher yield attributes, protein content and seed and stover yield which remained at par with chemical treatment of pendimethalin+imazethapyr (pre-mixed) @ 800 g ha ’PE fb HW at 30 DAS. Herbicide imazethapyr shows phytotoxic effect on cluster bean crop at 7 and 14 days after herbicide application, later on effect will be recover by the crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Echinochola crusgalli dominated monocot weeds.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Interactor
Echinochola crusgallie0weed
Outcome
dominant weed species among monocot weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dominant weed species among monocot weeds was Echinochola crusgalli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–312 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–239 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Digera arvensis was observed among dicot weeds.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Interactor
Digera arvensise0weed
Outcome
dicot weed species Digera arvensis was observede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in dicot weed species Digera arvensis was observed during the growing season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–393 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interculturing followed by hand weeding minimized total weed dry weight.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
interculteringfb hand weedinge0
Outcome
Total weed dry weighte0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total weed dry weight (monocot and dicot weeds) was the lowest in interculteringfb hand weeding carried out at 20 and 40 DAS at 25 and 50 DAS and at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 395–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Interculturing followed by hand weeding gave the minimum weed index.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
interculteringfb hand weedinge0
Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
Minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Minimum weed index was observed with the interculteringfb hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The hand-weeding treatment increased yield attributes, protein content, and seed and stover yield, comparable to chemical treatment.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobat0
Treatment
interculteringfb hand weedingt1
Outcome
yield attributes, protein content and seed and stover yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
chemical treatment of pendimethalin+imazethapyr (pre-mixed) @ 800 g ha ’PE fb HW at 30 DASe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also recorded higher yield attributes, protein content and seed and stover yield which remained at par with chemical treatment of pendimethalin+imazethapyr (pre-mixed) @ 800 g ha ’PE fb HW at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–855 · show in text ↑
t0

“seed yield of cluster bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–239 · show in text ↑
t1

“Minimum weed index was observed with the interculteringfb hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr caused phytotoxicity in cluster bean at 7 and 14 days after application, followed by recovery.

Taxon
cluster beanCyamopsis tetragonolobae0
Treatment
imazethapyre0
Outcome
phytotoxic effecte0
Qualifier
7 and 14 days after herbicide applicatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbicide imazethapyr shows phytotoxic effect on cluster bean crop at 7 and 14 days after herbicide application, later on effect will be recover by the crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1013 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · crop injury · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · quality: protein · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.