Paper · 2011 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of Weed Control Practices on Weed Dry Weight, Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Clusterbean [Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.] under Rainfed Condition

S. L. Yadav; M. K. Kaushik; S.L. Mundra

14
claims
25
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Imazethapyr, quizalofop-P-ethyl, pendimethalin and alachlor at 0.1, 0.06, 1.0 and 2.0 kg/ha, respectively, alone and with hand weeding 40 DAS were compared with one and two hand weedings against mixed weed flora in clusterbean. All the weed control treatments significantly reduced the dry weight of complex weed flora, although they differed in their effect on monocot and dicot weeds. Imazethapyr alone and with hand weeding 40 DAS effectively controlled both monocot and dicot weeds, while quizalofop-ethyl controlled only monocot weeds. Uninterrupted weed growth depleted 108.5 kg N, 15.8 kg P and 151.6 kg K/ha, while such losses were lowest with two hand weedings 20 and 40 DAS. Highest grain yield was obtained with weed free check (1840 kg/ha) followed by two hand weedings (1720 kg/ha) and imazethapyr 100 g/ha+hand weeding 40 DAS (1711 kg/ha) and it was significantly higher than all other treatments. Maximum uptake of N (133.8 kg/ha), P (32.5 kg/ha) and K (135.1 kg/ha) by clusterbean was recorded in two hand weedings (20 and 40 DAS), while in weedy check plots N, P and K uptake by crop was 40.6, 9.8 and 41.1 kg/ha, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-control treatments significantly reduced mixed weed dry weight.

Treatment
weed control treatmentse0
Interactor
weed florae0weed
Outcome
dry weight of complex weed florae0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the weed control treatments significantly reduced the dry weight of complex weed flora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–318 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr alone and with hand weeding controlled monocot and dicot weeds.

Treatment
Imazethapyr alone and with hand weeding 40 DASe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
both monocot and dicot weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazethapyr alone and with hand weeding 40 DAS effectively controlled both monocot and dicot weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 387–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quizalofop controlled only monocot weeds.

Treatment
quizalofop-ethyle0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
monocot weedse0
Direction
controllede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“quizalofop-ethyl controlled only monocot weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–539 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninterrupted weeds depleted 108.5 kg N/ha.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growth depletede0
Direction
depletede0
Value
108.5 kg Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uninterrupted weed growth depleted 108.5 kg N, 15.8 kg P and 151.6 kg K/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninterrupted weeds depleted 15.8 kg P/ha.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growth depletede0
Direction
depletede0
Value
15.8 kg Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uninterrupted weed growth depleted 108.5 kg N, 15.8 kg P and 151.6 kg K/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Uninterrupted weeds depleted 151.6 kg K/ha.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed growth depletede0
Direction
depletede0
Value
151.6 kg K/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Uninterrupted weed growth depleted 108.5 kg N, 15.8 kg P and 151.6 kg K/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–615 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings yielded the lowest nutrient loss.

Treatment
two hand weedings 20 and 40 DASe0
Outcome
lossese0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“such losses were lowest with two hand weedings 20 and 40 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed-free plots had the highest grain yield at 1840 kg/ha.

Treatment
weed free checke0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
1840 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest grain yield was obtained with weed free check (1840 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings yielded 1720 kg/ha grain.

Outcome
two hand weedingse0
Direction
followede0
Value
1720 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by two hand weedings (1720 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazethapyr plus hand weeding yielded 1711 kg/ha grain.

Outcome
imazethapyr 100 g/ha+hand weeding 40 DASe0
Value
1711 kg/hae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imazethapyr 100 g/ha+hand weeding 40 DAS (1711 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–852 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave maximum crop nitrogen uptake of 133.8 kg/ha.

Outcome
uptake of Ne0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
133.8 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum uptake of N (133.8 kg/ha), P (32.5 kg/ha) and K (135.1 kg/ha) by clusterbean was recorded in two hand weedings (20 and 40 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1046 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave maximum crop phosphorus uptake of 32.5 kg/ha.

Outcome
uptake of N (133.8 kg/ha), Pe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
32.5 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum uptake of N (133.8 kg/ha), P (32.5 kg/ha) and K (135.1 kg/ha) by clusterbean was recorded in two hand weedings (20 and 40 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1046 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings gave maximum crop potassium uptake of 135.1 kg/ha.

Outcome
uptake of N (133.8 kg/ha), P (32.5 kg/ha) and Ke0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
135.1 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum uptake of N (133.8 kg/ha), P (32.5 kg/ha) and K (135.1 kg/ha) by clusterbean was recorded in two hand weedings (20 and 40 DAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1046 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weedy checks had N, P and K crop uptake of 40.6, 9.8 and 41.1 kg/ha, respectively.

Outcome
N, P and K uptake by crope0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in weedy check plots N, P and K uptake by crop was 40.6, 9.8 and 41.1 kg/ha, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1143 · show in text ↑
t0

“clusterbean”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 82–93 · show in text ↑

Imazethapyr · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

quizalofop-ethyl · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · weed · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.