Paper · 1982 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Pea Aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae)-Induced Changes in Some Growth Rates of Pea Plants

C. A. Barlow; I. Messmer

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Feeding by Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on young pea plants, Pisum Sativum (L.) var. ‘Alaska,’ reduced the relative growth rate and efficiency of production of new tissue relative to the amount of leaf area by as much as 118%. These changes were proportional to the number of aphids and length of infestation period and occurred because of reductions in leaf surface area up to 83% and loss of pholosynlhate which aphids extracted. Reductions were only one-fifth to two-thirds as large when infestations were delayed for 5 days. Total leaf area of the plants relative to their weights was not decreased.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid feeding reduced pea relative growth rate by as much as 118%.

Taxon
Pisum SativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
Material
‘Alaska,’e0
Treatment
Feeding by Acyrthosiphon pisume0
Interactor
Acyrthosiphon pisumAcyrthosiphon pisume0pest
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
118%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Acyrthosiphon pisum
Acyrthosiphon pisum · InteractorShipher Wu (photograph) and Gee-way Lin (aphid provision), National Taiwan University · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Feeding by Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on young pea plants, Pisum Sativum (L.) var. ‘Alaska,’ reduced the relative growth rate and efficiency of production of new tissue relative to the amount of leaf area by as much as 118%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid feeding reduced efficiency of new tissue production relative to leaf area by as much as 118%.

Taxon
Pisum SativumLathyrus oleraceuse0
Treatment
Feeding by Acyrthosiphon pisume0
Interactor
Acyrthosiphon pisumAcyrthosiphon pisume0pest
Outcome
efficiency of production of new tissue relative to the amount of leaf areae0
Direction
reducede0
Value
118%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Acyrthosiphon pisum
Acyrthosiphon pisum · InteractorShipher Wu (photograph) and Gee-way Lin (aphid provision), National Taiwan University · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Feeding by Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on young pea plants, Pisum Sativum (L.) var. ‘Alaska,’ reduced the relative growth rate and efficiency of production of new tissue relative to the amount of leaf area by as much as 118%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–249 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth changes were proportional to aphid number and infestation duration.

Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
These changese0
Direction
proportionale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“These changes were proportional to the number of aphids and length of infestation period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aphid feeding reduced pea leaf surface area by up to 83%.

Interactor
aphidsAphidomorphae0pest
Outcome
leaf surface areae0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
83%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“reductions in leaf surface area up to 83% and loss of pholosynlhate which aphids extracted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delaying infestation for five days made reductions one fifth to two thirds as large.

Treatment
infestations were delayed for 5 dayse0
Outcome
Reductionse0
Direction
only one-fifth to two-thirds as largee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Reductions were only one-fifth to two-thirds as large when infestations were delayed for 5 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–551 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf area relative to plant weight was not decreased.

Outcome
Total leaf area of the plants relative to their weightse0
Direction
not decreasede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Total leaf area of the plants relative to their weights was not decreased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–626 · show in text ↑

Acyrthosiphon pisum · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

infection · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

infection · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.