Paper · 2013 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Management strategies to reduce losses caused by fusarium seedling blight of field pea

K. F. Chang; S. F. Hwang; H. U. Ahmed; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
24
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Chang, K. F., Hwang, S. F., Ahmed, H. U., Gossen, B. D., Turnbull, G. D. and Strelkov, S. E. 2013. Management strategies to reduce losses caused by fusarium seedling blight of field pea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 93: 619–625. Fusarium seedling blight can cause substantial reductions in the stand density of field pea in western Canada. In greenhouse experiments, emergence decreased and root rot severity rose with increasing inoculum density. In field trials in 2007 and 2008 near Edmonton, AB, seeding at different depths and seeding dates did not consistently affect emergence or yield in Fusarium-infested soils. In field experiments, emergence declined significantly with each increase in inoculum level. Also, seed yield were reduced at high levels of disease pressure. Treatment of seed with Apron Maxx improved emergence, nodulation and yield of treatments challenged with inoculum of F. avenaceum in both greenhouse and field experiments. This research demonstrates the need to prevent seedling blight and root rot through proper seed treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In greenhouse experiments, emergence of field pea decreased with increasing Fusarium inoculum density.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
increasing inoculum densitye0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
greenhouse experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fusarium seedling blight of field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“In greenhouse experiments, emergence decreased and root rot severity rose with increasing inoculum density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–436 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium seedling blight can cause substantial reductions in the stand density of field pea in western Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In greenhouse experiments, root rot severity of field pea rose with increasing Fusarium inoculum density.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
increasing inoculum densitye0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume1pathogen
Outcome
root rot severitye0
Direction
rosee0
Setting
greenhouse experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fusarium seedling blight of field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“In greenhouse experiments, emergence decreased and root rot severity rose with increasing inoculum density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–436 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fusarium seedling blight can cause substantial reductions in the stand density of field pea in western Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Fusarium-infested field soils, seeding depth and seeding date did not consistently affect emergence or yield of field pea.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
seeding at different depths and seeding datese2
Interactor
FusariumFusariume2pathogen
Outcome
emergence or yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Setting
near Edmonton, ABe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fusarium seedling blight of field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 · show in text ↑
e2

“In field trials in 2007 and 2008 near Edmonton, AB, seeding at different depths and seeding dates did not consistently affect emergence or yield in Fusarium-infested soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–609 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In field experiments, emergence of field pea declined significantly with each increase in inoculum level.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
each increase in inoculum levele3
Outcome
emergencee3
Direction
declinede3
Setting
field experimentse3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“fusarium seedling blight of field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 · show in text ↑
e3

“In field experiments, emergence declined significantly with each increase in inoculum level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apron Maxx seed treatment improved emergence, nodulation and yield of field pea challenged with F. avenaceum in greenhouse and field.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
Treatment of seed with Apron Maxxe4
Interactor
F. avenaceumFusarium avenaceume4pathogen
Outcome
emergence, nodulation and yielde4
Direction
improvede4
Setting
greenhouse and field experimentse4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fusarium avenaceum
Fusarium avenaceum · InteractorGlimmerpilzchen · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“fusarium seedling blight of field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 · show in text ↑
e4

“Treatment of seed with Apron Maxx improved emergence, nodulation and yield of treatments challenged with inoculum of F. avenaceum in both greenhouse and field experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield of field pea was reduced at high levels of disease pressure.

Taxon
field peat0
Treatment
high levels of disease pressuree5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“fusarium seedling blight of field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 · show in text ↑
e5

“Also, seed yield were reduced at high levels of disease pressure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–768 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend preventing seedling blight and root rot in field pea through proper seed treatment.

Taxon
field peat0
Outcome
prevent seedling blight and root rot through proper seed treatmente6

Verbatim

t0

“fusarium seedling blight of field pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–86 · show in text ↑
e6

“This research demonstrates the need to prevent seedling blight and root rot through proper seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1047 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Fusarium · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 72 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

infection · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results agree

9 papers: 0 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.