Paper · 2012 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Response of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosacv. Allison) to post-harvest treatment with 1-methylcyclopropene

R.R. Sharma; M. J. Jhalegar; R.K. Pal

14
claims
69
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryExperiments were conducted to observe the effect of different concentrations of 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) on the post-harvest life and quality of ‘Allison’ kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa). Fruit were treated with 1-MCP at 0.5 µl l–1, 1.0 µl l–1, or 2.0 µl l–1, un-treated fruit served as controls. Each 1-MCP treatment was applied for 24 h at 20°C. After treatment, fruit were transferred to ambient temperature storage (22º ± 4ºC; 65 – 70% relative humidity) for 18 d, during which time observations on various physical, physiological, and biochemical parameters were recorded at 3 d intervals. Our results indicated that 2.0 µl l–1 1-MCP was the most effective treatment to delay softening and ripening in ‘Allison’ kiwifruit, as such fruit showed the lowest mean weight loss (9.8 ± 0.2%), the highest mean fruit firmness value (32.7 ± 0.2 N), and began to ripen only after 12 d in storage, whereas untreated fruit started ripening on day-6 of storage. The activities of fruit softening enzymes such as polygalacturonase (PG; 58.5 ± 0.3 µg galacturonic acid g–1 FW h–1), and lipoxygenase (LOX; 3.96 ± 1.3 µmoles linoleic acid oxidised min–1 g–1 FW h–1) were lower, and total phenolics (TP) contents (24.3 ± 0.3 mg 100 g–1) and anti-oxidant (AOX) activities (12.5 ± 0.03 µmol Trolox g–1 FW h–1) were higher in 1-MCP-treated fruit than in untreated fruit (PG, 98.3 ± 0.5 µg galacturonic acid g–1 FW h–1; LOX, 4.39 ± 1.0 µmoles min–1 g–1 FW h–1; TP, 5.3 ± 0.6 mg 100 g–1; AOX, 4.7 ± 0.02 µmol Trolox g–1 FW h–1, respectively). In addition, 1-MCP-treated fruit exhibited lower rates of respiration (48.3 ± 0.4 ml CO2 kg–1 h–1) and ethylene production (30.2 ± 0.02 µl kg–1 FW h–1) than untreated fruit (58.9 ± 0.6 ml CO2 kg–1 h–1; 38.7 ± 0.04 µl kg–1 FW h–1, respectively). Similarly, 1-MCP-treated fruit had higher titratable acidity (TA; 1.33 ± 0.3%) and ascorbic acid (AA) contents (115.9 ± 2.6 mg 100 g–1 pulp) and lower soluble solids contents (SSC; 8.33º ± 0.2º Brix) than untreated kiwifruit (TA, 1.0 ± 0.2 %; AA, 105.3 ± 2.2 mg 100 g–1 pulp; SSC, 13.7º ± 0.3º Brix, respectively). Thus, 2.0 µl l–1 1-MCP can be used for the post-harvest treatment of ‘Allison’ kiwifruit to enhance its shelf-life and marketability by approx. 6 d.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with 2.0 µl l–1 1-MCP was the most effective treatment for delaying softening and ripening of Allison kiwifruit.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
softening and ripeninge2
Direction
delaye2
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“was the most effective treatment to delay softening and ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP at 2.0 µl l–1 gave the lowest mean weight loss, 9.8 ± 0.2%, in Allison kiwifruit.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
mean weight losse2
Direction
loweste2
Value
9.8 ± 0.2%e2
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“the lowest mean weight loss (9.8 ± 0.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP at 2.0 µl l–1 gave the highest mean fruit firmness, 32.7 ± 0.2 N, in Allison kiwifruit.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
fruit firmnesse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
32.7 ± 0.2 Ne2
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“the highest mean fruit firmness value (32.7 ± 0.2 N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kiwifruit treated with 2.0 µl l–1 1-MCP began to ripen only after 12 d in storage, whereas untreated fruit started ripening on day 6.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
began to ripene2
Value
12 de2
Qualifier
untreated fruit started ripening on day-6e2
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“began to ripen only after 12 d in storage, whereas untreated fruit started ripening on day-6 of storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–963 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polygalacturonase activity was lower in 1-MCP-treated kiwifruit (58.5 ± 0.3 µg galacturonic acid g–1 FW h–1) than in untreated fruit (98.3 ± 0.5).

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
polygalacturonasee2
Direction
lowere3
Value
58.5 ± 0.3 µg galacturonic acid g–1 FW h–1e2
Qualifier
98.3 ± 0.5 µg galacturonic acid g–1 FW h–1e4
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“polygalacturonase (PG; 58.5 ± 0.3 µg galacturonic acid g–1 FW h–1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1081 · show in text ↑
e3

“were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1175 · show in text ↑
e4

“PG, 98.3 ± 0.5 µg galacturonic acid g–1 FW h–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1412 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lipoxygenase activity was lower in 1-MCP-treated kiwifruit (3.96 ± 1.3 µmoles linoleic acid oxidised min–1 g–1 FW h–1) than in untreated fruit (4.39 ± 1.0).

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
lipoxygenasee2
Direction
lowere3
Value
3.96 ± 1.3 µmoles linoleic acid oxidised min–1 g–1 FW h–1e2
Qualifier
4.39 ± 1.0 µmoles min–1 g–1 FW h–1e4
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“lipoxygenase (LOX; 3.96 ± 1.3 µmoles linoleic acid oxidised min–1 g–1 FW h–1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1164 · show in text ↑
e3

“were lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1175 · show in text ↑
e4

“LOX, 4.39 ± 1.0 µmoles min–1 g–1 FW h–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolics content was higher in 1-MCP-treated kiwifruit (24.3 ± 0.3 mg 100 g–1) than in untreated fruit (5.3 ± 0.6 mg 100 g–1).

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
total phenolicse2
Direction
highere3
Value
24.3 ± 0.3 mg 100 g–1e2
Qualifier
5.3 ± 0.6 mg 100 g–1e4
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“total phenolics (TP) contents (24.3 ± 0.3 mg 100 g–1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1234 · show in text ↑
e3

“were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1317 · show in text ↑
e4

“TP, 5.3 ± 0.6 mg 100 g–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1479 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant activity was higher in 1-MCP-treated kiwifruit (12.5 ± 0.03 µmol Trolox g–1 FW h–1) than in untreated fruit (4.7 ± 0.02).

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
anti-oxidant (AOX) activitiese2
Direction
highere3
Value
12.5 ± 0.03 µmol Trolox g–1 FW h–1e2
Qualifier
4.7 ± 0.02 µmol Trolox g–1 FW h–1e4
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“anti-oxidant (AOX) activities (12.5 ± 0.03 µmol Trolox g–1 FW h–1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1305 · show in text ↑
e3

“were higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1317 · show in text ↑
e4

“AOX, 4.7 ± 0.02 µmol Trolox g–1 FW h–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1519 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP-treated kiwifruit had a lower respiration rate (48.3 ± 0.4 ml CO2 kg–1 h–1) than untreated fruit (58.9 ± 0.6).

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
respiratione2
Direction
lowere2
Value
48.3 ± 0.4 ml CO2 kg–1 h–1e2
Qualifier
58.9 ± 0.6 ml CO2 kg–1 h–1e4
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“lower rates of respiration (48.3 ± 0.4 ml CO2 kg–1 h–1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1634 · show in text ↑
e4

“58.9 ± 0.6 ml CO2 kg–1 h–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP-treated kiwifruit had lower ethylene production (30.2 ± 0.02 µl kg–1 FW h–1) than untreated fruit (38.7 ± 0.04).

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
ethylene productione2
Direction
lowere3
Value
30.2 ± 0.02 µl kg–1 FW h–1e2
Qualifier
38.7 ± 0.04 µl kg–1 FW h–1e4
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“ethylene production (30.2 ± 0.02 µl kg–1 FW h–1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1639–1687 · show in text ↑
e3

“lower rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1590 · show in text ↑
e4

“38.7 ± 0.04 µl kg–1 FW h–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1738–1764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP-treated kiwifruit had higher titratable acidity (1.33 ± 0.3%) than untreated fruit (1.0 ± 0.2%).

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
titratable aciditye2
Direction
highere2
Value
1.33 ± 0.3%e2
Qualifier
1.0 ± 0.2 %e4
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher titratable acidity (TA; 1.33 ± 0.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1816–1859 · show in text ↑
e4

“TA, 1.0 ± 0.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2007–2022 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP-treated kiwifruit had higher ascorbic acid content (115.9 ± 2.6 mg 100 g–1 pulp) than untreated fruit (105.3 ± 2.2).

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
ascorbic acid (AA) contentse2
Direction
highere3
Value
115.9 ± 2.6 mg 100 g–1 pulpe2
Qualifier
105.3 ± 2.2 mg 100 g–1 pulpe4
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“ascorbic acid (AA) contents (115.9 ± 2.6 mg 100 g–1 pulp)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1864–1921 · show in text ↑
e3

“had higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1812–1822 · show in text ↑
e4

“AA, 105.3 ± 2.2 mg 100 g–1 pulp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2024–2055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP-treated kiwifruit had lower soluble solids content (8.33º ± 0.2º Brix) than untreated fruit (13.7º ± 0.3º Brix).

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
soluble solids contentse2
Direction
lowere2
Value
8.33º ± 0.2º Brixe2
Qualifier
13.7º ± 0.3º Brixe4
Comparator
un-treated fruite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit were treated with 1-MCP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–228 · show in text ↑
e1

“un-treated fruit served as controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–306 · show in text ↑
e2

“lower soluble solids contents (SSC; 8.33º ± 0.2º Brix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–1980 · show in text ↑
e4

“SSC, 13.7º ± 0.3º Brix”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2057–2079 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

2.0 µl l–1 1-MCP can be used for post-harvest treatment of Allison kiwifruit to extend shelf-life and marketability by about 6 d.

Taxon
kiwifruitActinidia deliciosat0
Treatment
2.0 µl l–1 1-MCPe0
Outcome
shelf-life and marketabilitye0
Value
approx. 6 de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Actinidia deliciosa
Actinidia deliciosa · TaxonLuis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez ( Lmbuga ) Copyright: GFDL ( GNU Free Documentation License ) Publicada por/ Publish by : Luis Miguel Bugallo Sánchez · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“kiwifruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–21 · show in text ↑
e0

“2.0 µl l–1 1-MCP can be used for the post-harvest treatment of ‘Allison’ kiwifruit to enhance its shelf-life and marketability by approx. 6 d”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2102–2243 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: respiration · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · molecular: metabolites · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results differ

16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results differ

38 papers: 34 positive, 4 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: phytochemicals · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · physiology: hormones · Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.