Abstract
A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil.The results showed that in 50 mg/kg Atrazine polluted soil,GI and GM could both invade sorghum root to form mycorrhiza,and the infection rate of GM is higher than that of GI while the GM invading rate was 90.5%,the highest.It could also be concluded that AM fungi leading to a comparatively better plant productivity.The residue concentration of Atrazine in soil was lower in AM inoculated treatment compared with that of uninoculated,and GM inoculation results in better degradation performance than GI.The mycorrhiza effect is 22.6% in 91.6% degradation rate of Atrazine in soil inoculated with GM.The amount of microorganisms in rhizosphere soil is larger in soil inoculated with AM fungi especially with GM,that probably means AM fungi could accelerate the reproduction of rhizo-microorganisms.AM inoculation could enhance urease activity but not significantly to catalase activity in soil.Therefore,GM is an ideal AM fungus in remediation of Atrazine contaminated soil.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Glomus intraradices and Glomus mosseae both invaded sorghum roots to form mycorrhiza in atrazine-polluted soil.
- Interactor
- glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese1symbiont
- Second interactor
- glomus mosseae
Funneliformis mosseaee1symbiont - Outcome
- invade sorghum root to form mycorrhizae2
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil”
e2“in 50 mg/kg Atrazine polluted soil,GI and GM could both invade sorghum root to form mycorrhiza”
Claim · model-written summary
The infection rate of Glomus mosseae was higher than that of Glomus intraradices.
- Treatment
- GMe3
- Interactor
- glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
- Second interactor
- glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese1symbiont
- Outcome
- infection ratee3
- Direction
- highere3
- Comparator
- GIe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil”
e3“the infection rate of GM is higher than that of GI”
Claim · model-written summary
The invading rate of Glomus mosseae was 90.5%.
- Interactor
- glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
- Outcome
- GM invading ratee4
- Value
- 90.5%e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil”
e4“the GM invading rate was 90.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
AM inoculation lowered the atrazine residue concentration in soil compared with uninoculated soil.
- Treatment
- AM inoculated treatmente5
- Interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
- Outcome
- residue concentration of Atrazine in soile5
- Direction
- lowere5
- Comparator
- uninoculatede5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil”
e5“The residue concentration of Atrazine in soil was lower in AM inoculated treatment compared with that of uninoculated”
Claim · model-written summary
Glomus mosseae inoculation gave better atrazine degradation performance than Glomus intraradices.
- Treatment
- GM inoculatione6
- Interactor
- glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
- Second interactor
- glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese1symbiont
- Outcome
- degradation performancee6
- Direction
- bettere6
- Comparator
- GIe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil”
e6“GM inoculation results in better degradation performance than GI”
Claim · model-written summary
The mycorrhiza effect was 22.6% in soil inoculated with Glomus mosseae.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil”
e7“The mycorrhiza effect is 22.6% in 91.6% degradation rate of Atrazine in soil inoculated with GM”
Claim · model-written summary
Atrazine degradation rate in soil inoculated with Glomus mosseae was 91.6%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil”
e7“The mycorrhiza effect is 22.6% in 91.6% degradation rate of Atrazine in soil inoculated with GM”
Claim · model-written summary
AM inoculation made the amount of microorganisms in rhizosphere soil larger.
- Treatment
- soil inoculated with AM fungie2
- Outcome
- The amount of microorganisms in rhizosphere soile2
- Direction
- largere2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil”
e2“The amount of microorganisms in rhizosphere soil is larger in soil inoculated with AM fungi especially with GM”
Claim · model-written summary
AM inoculation could enhance urease activity in soil.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil”
e2“AM inoculation could enhance urease activity but not significantly to catalase activity in soil”
Claim · model-written summary
AM inoculation did not significantly enhance catalase activity in soil.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil”
e2“AM inoculation could enhance urease activity but not significantly to catalase activity in soil”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi gave comparatively better plant productivity of sorghum.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil”
e2“It could also be concluded that AM fungi leading to a comparatively better plant productivity”
Claim · model-written summary
Glomus mosseae is an ideal AM fungus for remediation of atrazine-contaminated soil.
- Outcome
- remediation of Atrazine contaminated soile2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A sorghum pot experiment was conducted to assess the effect of AM fungi glomus intraradices(GI) and glomus mosseae(GM) to degrad Atrazine in soil”
e2“Therefore,GM is an ideal AM fungus in remediation of Atrazine contaminated soil”
The same questions in other papers
mycorrhiza · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · SorghumPositive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
inoculation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · SorghumPositive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
mycorrhiza · Glomeromycota · SorghumPositive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →inoculation · Funneliformis mosseae · SorghumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
inoculation · Glomeromycota · SorghumResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
mycorrhiza · yield · SorghumResults agree
16 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.