Paper · 2005 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Studies on elevated temperature, short-term storage of ‘Sunrise’ Summer apples using 1-MCP to maintain quality

Peter Toivonen; Lu Lu

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
42
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryThe work presented in this paper was initiated to evaluate the potential for short-term storage at elevated temperatures for the Summer apple cv. ‘Sunrise’, using 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) to control ripening. Fruit were harvested three times at 1 week intervals, with the first harvest being that which the industry normally considers acceptable for commercial harvest. A treatment concentration of 100 nl l–1 1-MCP was sufficient to provide maximum inhibition of ripening when fruit were held at 15° – 22°C. If fruit were harvested at the current, commercially recommended, optimal harvest maturity, quality benefits were consistent from year-to-year. However if fruit were harvested at later maturities there were year-to-year differences in ripening inhibition with 1-MCP treatment. Two sequential weekly treatments with 1-MCP extended the effectiveness of the treatment in maintaining firmness and titratable acidity. When ‘Sunrise’ apples were treated and stored at 13°C, the effects of 1-MCP were significantly impaired.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 100 nl l–1 1-MCP treatment maximally inhibited ripening at 15° – 22°C.

Material
‘Sunrise’t0
Treatment
100 nl l–1 1-MCPe0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
maximum inhibitione0
Qualifier
15° – 22°Ce0

Not reportedComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A treatment concentration of 100 nl l–1 1-MCP was sufficient to provide maximum inhibition of ripening when fruit were held at 15° – 22°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Sunrise’ Summer apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit harvested at the recommended optimal maturity had quality benefits consistent across years.

Material
‘Sunrise’t0
Outcome
quality benefitse0
Qualifier
current, commercially recommended, optimal harvest maturitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“If fruit were harvested at the current, commercially recommended, optimal harvest maturity, quality benefits were consistent from year-to-year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Sunrise’ Summer apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–78 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later harvest maturity led to year-to-year differences in 1-MCP ripening inhibition.

Material
‘Sunrise’t0
Treatment
1-MCP treatmente0
Outcome
year-to-year differences in ripening inhibitione0
Qualifier
later maturitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However if fruit were harvested at later maturities there were year-to-year differences in ripening inhibition with 1-MCP treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–796 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Sunrise’ Summer apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sequential weekly 1-MCP treatments extended firmness and titratable acidity maintenance.

Material
‘Sunrise’t0
Treatment
Two sequential weekly treatments with 1-MCPe0
Outcome
firmness and titratable aciditye0
Direction
extendede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two sequential weekly treatments with 1-MCP extended the effectiveness of the treatment in maintaining firmness and titratable acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–932 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Sunrise’ Summer apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 13°C, the effects of 1-MCP on Sunrise apples were significantly impaired.

Material
‘Sunrise’e0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
effects of 1-MCPe0
Direction
impairede0
Qualifier
13°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When ‘Sunrise’ apples were treated and stored at 13°C, the effects of 1-MCP were significantly impaired.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1037 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

52 papers: 37 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: sugar starch · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

56 papers: 47 positive, 9 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

120 papers: 113 positive, 7 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.