Abstract

Many of the apples ( Malus ×domestica ) grown in the southeastern United States are sold to consumers through direct farm markets and roadside stands. Fruit in these markets may be exposed to high temperatures (>68 °F), which cause the fruit to ripen quickly, limiting their shelf life and consumer appeal and increasing their susceptibility to decay pathogens. Studies were undertaken in 2009 and 2010 to determine the effects of a 1-μL·L −1 postharvest 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatment on the maintenance of flesh firmness and the incidence of rots in fruit held at elevated temperatures for up to 8 weeks. 1-MCP-treated fruit of three apple cultivars (Ginger Gold, Gala, and Golden Delicious) held in three retail farm markets in the southeastern United States maintained their firmness for 3 to 5 weeks. The firmness of non-treated ‘Ginger Gold’ fruit declined to less than 12 lbf after 1 week in each market, whereas the firmness of treated fruit remained greater than 16 lbf after 3 weeks. Treated ‘Gala’ fruit maintained their firmness at 14 lbf during 4 weeks in each farm market, whereas the firmness of non-treated fruit declined to less than 12 lbf after 2 weeks. The firmness of non-treated ‘Golden Delicious’ fruit declined to less than 12 lbf after 1 week in each farm market, whereas treated fruit maintained their firmness for up to 4 weeks. ‘Golden Delicious’ fruit treated with 1-MCP exhibited almost no loss of firmness during 4 weeks at 32, 50, or 70 °F, or even up to 8 weeks at 32 or 50 °F. The incidence of fruit rots increased with temperature, and 1-MCP reduced the incidence of fruit rots after 4 weeks at 70 °F in 2009 or after 8 weeks at 70 °F in 2010. These data show that 1-MCP may be of great benefit to producers who sell their fruit directly to the consumer by delaying the loss in firmness and reducing the incidence of rots in fruit kept at elevated temperatures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated Ginger Gold apples stayed above 16 lbf after three weeks whereas untreated fruit fell below 12 lbf after one week.

Material
Ginger Golde0
Treatment
treatede0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
remained greater thane0
Value
16 lbfe0
Qualifier
after 3 weekse0
Comparator
non-treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The firmness of non-treated ‘Ginger Gold’ fruit declined to less than 12 lbf after 1 week in each market, whereas the firmness of treated fruit remained greater than 16 lbf after 3 weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–1001 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of 1-Methylcyclopropene on Firmness Loss and the Development of Rots in Apple Fruit Kept in Farm Markets or at Elevated Temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated Gala apples retained 14 lbf firmness for four weeks while untreated fruit fell below 12 lbf after two weeks.

Material
Galae0
Treatment
Treatede0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
maintainede0
Value
14 lbfe0
Comparator
non-treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treated ‘Gala’ fruit maintained their firmness at 14 lbf during 4 weeks in each farm market, whereas the firmness of non-treated fruit declined to less than 12 lbf after 2 weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated Golden Delicious apples retained firmness for four weeks while untreated fruit fell below 12 lbf in one week.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
treatede0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
maintainede0
Value
4 weekse0
Comparator
non-treatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The firmness of non-treated ‘Golden Delicious’ fruit declined to less than 12 lbf after 1 week in each farm market, whereas treated fruit maintained their firmness for up to 4 weeks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1363 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP-treated Golden Delicious fruit lost almost no firmness for four weeks at 32, 50, or 70 °F.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
firmnesse0
Direction
almost no losse0
Qualifier
during 4 weeks at 32, 50, or 70 °F, or even up to 8 weeks at 32 or 50 °Fe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Golden Delicious’ fruit treated with 1-MCP exhibited almost no loss of firmness during 4 weeks at 32, 50, or 70 °F, or even up to 8 weeks at 32 or 50 °F.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple fruit rot incidence rose with temperature.

Treatment
temperaturee0
Outcome
incidence of fruit rotse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The incidence of fruit rots increased with temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1573 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1-MCP reduced apple fruit rots after four weeks at 70 °F in 2009 and eight weeks in 2010.

Treatment
1-MCPe0
Outcome
incidence of fruit rotse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
after 4 weeks at 70 °F in 2009 or after 8 weeks at 70 °F in 2010e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP reduced the incidence of fruit rots after 4 weeks at 70 °F in 2009 or after 8 weeks at 70 °F in 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1579–1685 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

49 papers: 33 positive, 16 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

120 papers: 113 positive, 7 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.