Paper · 1994 · HortScience

699 PB 309 THE MODE OF CO2 ACTION ON ACC OXIDASE AND ITS ROLE IN INHIBITION OF ETHYLENE BIOSYNTHESIS

James R. Gorny; Adel A. Kader

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ethylene biosynthesis of Golden Delicious apple fruit at 20°C is rapidly inhibited by a controlled atmosphere of air + 20% CO 2 . However, in vitro ACC oxidase activity and ACC content were not significantly different between air and air + 20% CO 2 treated fruit, To determine the in vivo effects of CO 2 treatment, both in vivo and in vitro enzyme activity essays were performed in en atmosphere of air or air + 20% CO 2 . Western blots were also performed to quantify the amount of ACC oxidase protein present in the air and air + 20% CO 2 treated fruit. We believe that in vivo cytosolic pH changes, induced by CO 2 , may reduce the in vivo catalytic capacity of ACC oxidase, end hence significantly reduce ethylene biosynthesis in climacteric tissue,

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air with 20% CO 2 rapidly inhibited ethylene biosynthesis of Golden Delicious apple fruit at 20°C.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
air + 20% CO 2e0
Outcome
Ethylene biosynthesise0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
20°Ce0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethylene biosynthesis of Golden Delicious apple fruit at 20°C is rapidly inhibited by a controlled atmosphere of air + 20% CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–127 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In vitro ACC oxidase activity did not significantly differ between air and elevated CO2 treated fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
air + 20% CO 2e0
Gene
ACC oxidasee0
Outcome
in vitro ACC oxidase activitye0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
aire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in vitro ACC oxidase activity and ACC content were not significantly different between air and air + 20% CO 2 treated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–262 · show in text ↑
e1

“Golden Delicious apple fruit at 20°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–61 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ACC content did not significantly differ between air and elevated CO2 treated fruit.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
air + 20% CO 2e0
Outcome
ACC contente0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Comparator
aire0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in vitro ACC oxidase activity and ACC content were not significantly different between air and air + 20% CO 2 treated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–262 · show in text ↑
e1

“Golden Delicious apple fruit at 20°C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 25–61 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.