Paper · 2010 · Journal of Entomological Research

Performance of insecticides and transgenic Bt cotton for the management of pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) in cotton.

B. Sandhya Rani; N. V. V. S. D. Prasad; P. Arjuna Rao; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field evaluation of insecticides and transgenic Bt cotton against pink bollworm in cotton revealed that the transgenic Bt cotton was most effective in reducing pink bollworm infestation among all the treatments by recording lowest larval incidence and green boll locule damage. Among insecticides tested Spark (deltamethrin + triazophos) was the best followed by triazophos, deltamethrin, thiodicarb and lamda cyhalothrin. While chlorpyriphos, neem formulation, novaluron and emamectin benzoate were found ineffective recording high green boll locule damage and larval incidence in addition to high open boll and open locule damage at harvest. Highest yields were realized in spark (29.25q/ha), triazophos (28.50q/ha), transgenic Bt cotton (28.39q/ha) and deltamethrin (28.05q/ha) treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bt cotton had the lowest pink bollworm larval incidence and green boll locule damage among treatments.

Treatment
transgenic Bt cottone0
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellae0pest
Outcome
larval incidence and green boll locule damagee0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transgenic Bt cotton was most effective in reducing pink bollworm infestation among all the treatments by recording lowest larval incidence and green boll locule damage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–276 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spark was the best insecticide against pink bollworm, followed by triazophos, deltamethrin, thiodicarb and lamda cyhalothrin.

Treatment
Spark (deltamethrin + triazophos)e0
Outcome
the beste0
Direction
the beste0
Comparator
triazophos, deltamethrin, thiodicarb and lamda cyhalothrine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among insecticides tested Spark (deltamethrin + triazophos) was the best followed by triazophos, deltamethrin, thiodicarb and lamda cyhalothrin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–421 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

chlorpyriphos was ineffective, with high boll damage and larval incidence.

Treatment
chlorpyriphose0
Interactor
pink bollwormPectinophora gossypiellat0pest
Outcome
green boll locule damage and larval incidencee0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pectinophora gossypiella
Pectinophora gossypiella · InteractorAlbertonatureza · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorpyriphos, neem formulation, novaluron and emamectin benzoate were found ineffective recording high green boll locule damage and larval incidence in addition to high open boll and open locule damage at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Saunders) in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

neem formulation was ineffective, with high boll damage and larval incidence.

Treatment
neem formulatione0
Outcome
green boll locule damage and larval incidencee0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorpyriphos, neem formulation, novaluron and emamectin benzoate were found ineffective recording high green boll locule damage and larval incidence in addition to high open boll and open locule damage at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

novaluron was ineffective, with high boll damage and larval incidence.

Treatment
novalurone0
Outcome
green boll locule damage and larval incidencee0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorpyriphos, neem formulation, novaluron and emamectin benzoate were found ineffective recording high green boll locule damage and larval incidence in addition to high open boll and open locule damage at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

emamectin benzoate was ineffective, with high boll damage and larval incidence.

Treatment
emamectin benzoatee0
Outcome
green boll locule damage and larval incidencee0
Direction
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorpyriphos, neem formulation, novaluron and emamectin benzoate were found ineffective recording high green boll locule damage and larval incidence in addition to high open boll and open locule damage at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield under spark was 29.25q/ha.

Treatment
sparke0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
29.25q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yields were realized in spark (29.25q/ha), triazophos (28.50q/ha), transgenic Bt cotton (28.39q/ha) and deltamethrin (28.05q/ha) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield under triazophos was 28.50q/ha.

Treatment
triazophose0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
28.50q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yields were realized in spark (29.25q/ha), triazophos (28.50q/ha), transgenic Bt cotton (28.39q/ha) and deltamethrin (28.05q/ha) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield under transgenic Bt cotton was 28.39q/ha.

Treatment
transgenic Bt cottone0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
28.39q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yields were realized in spark (29.25q/ha), triazophos (28.50q/ha), transgenic Bt cotton (28.39q/ha) and deltamethrin (28.05q/ha) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton yield under deltamethrin was 28.05q/ha.

Treatment
deltamethrine0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
28.05q/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yields were realized in spark (29.25q/ha), triazophos (28.50q/ha), transgenic Bt cotton (28.39q/ha) and deltamethrin (28.05q/ha) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–792 · show in text ↑
t0

“in cotton.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–136 · show in text ↑

emamectin benzoate · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

deltamethrin · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

chlorpyrifos · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

triazophos · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

transgenic · Pectinophora gossypiella · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.