Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Protection Research

Application of new bioformulations of Pseudomonas aureofaciens for biocontrol of cotton seedling damping-off

Samaneh Samavat; Asghar Heydari; Hamid Reza Zamanizadeh; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Pseudomonas aureofaciens (30-84) is a phenazine producing bacterium and reported as asuccessful biocontrol agent of some plant fungal pathogens. In the present study, the possibility of biological control of cotton damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia solani (AG-4) through phenazine production by the 30-84 strain, was investigated. In the search for the development of bioformulations of Pa (m) (PhzR–) and Pa (w) (PhzR+) strains of 30-84, four new carriers including soybean meal (SM), cottonseed meal (CM), rice bran (RB), and talc powder (TAL) were selected. The efficacy of bacterial formulations in reducing disease incidence was evaluated in four intervals (15, 30, 45, and 60 days after sowing), and compared with each bacterial suspension efficacy under green-house conditions. The results revealed that organic carriers were more effective than talc powder. It was also found that all the bioformulations were more efficient than each bacterial suspension. The most effective in reducing disease incidence was Pa (w) + RB. In contrast, Pa (m), Pa (m) + TAL, and Pa (m) + RB did not significantly suppress the disease in comparison with the infested control. Thus, phenazine production as a main biocontrol mechanism of P. aureofaciens (30-84) may be affected by the kind of carriers used for the bioformulation development.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carriers were more effective than talc powder against damping-off.

Treatment
organic carrierse0
Outcome
more effectivee0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
talc powdere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results revealed that organic carriers were more effective than talc powder.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton seedling damping-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All bioformulations exceeded bacterial suspensions in efficacy.

Treatment
bioformulationse0
Outcome
more efficiente0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
bacterial suspensione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It was also found that all the bioformulations were more efficient than each bacterial suspension.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton seedling damping-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pa (w) + RB was most effective at reducing disease incidence.

Treatment
Pa (w) + RBe0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The most effective in reducing disease incidence was Pa (w) + RB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton seedling damping-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pa (m) did not significantly suppress disease versus infested control.

Treatment
Pa (m)e0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
did not significantly suppresse0
Comparator
infested controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pa (m), Pa (m) + TAL, and Pa (m) + RB did not significantly suppress the disease in comparison with the infested control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton seedling damping-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pa (m) + TAL did not significantly suppress disease.

Treatment
Pa (m) + TALe0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
did not significantly suppresse0
Comparator
infested controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pa (m), Pa (m) + TAL, and Pa (m) + RB did not significantly suppress the disease in comparison with the infested control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton seedling damping-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pa (m) + RB did not significantly suppress disease.

Treatment
Pa (m) + RBe0
Outcome
diseasee0
Direction
did not significantly suppresse0
Comparator
infested controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pa (m), Pa (m) + TAL, and Pa (m) + RB did not significantly suppress the disease in comparison with the infested control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton seedling damping-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–108 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrier choice may affect phenazine-mediated biocontrol.

Outcome
biocontrol mechanisme0
Qualifier
kind of carrierse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“phenazine production as a main biocontrol mechanism of P. aureofaciens (30-84) may be affected by the kind of carriers used for the bioformulation development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1340 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton seedling damping-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–108 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.