Paper · 2012 · Indian Journal of Horticulture

Effect of N and K application on yield and quality of pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions

Poonam Kashyap; K. K. Pramanick; Kamlesh K. Meena; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The pomegranate plants were treated with five levels of nitrogen (250, 375, 500, 625 and 750 g/plant) and potassium (200, 300, 400, 500 and 600 g/plant) to evaluate their influence on fruit yield and quality. The plants were raised and maintained under crescent bund with open catchment pits. Basal dose of FYM (15 kg/plant) and phosphorus (250 g/plant) were applied in mid December. Full dose of phosphorus (single super phosphate), potassium (muriate of potash) and half of nitrogen (calcium ammonium nitrate) were applied in the first fortnight of January and second half in the second fortnight of May. The experiments were conducted in randomized block design with three replications. The maximum fruit set (28.85 and 27.37%), fruit yield (14.94 and 14.91 kg), TSS (16.07 and 16%), total sugars (11.46 and 11.44%), non-reducing sugars (2.80 and 2.68%) and reducing sugars (9.56 and 9.58%) were recorded with the treatment N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant). Whereas, maximum fruit weight (458.3 and 458.1 g) and fruits with high acidity (0.52 and 0.54%) were obtained with N5K4 (N-750: K-500) and N5K5 (N-750: K-600) for both the years. The vitamin C content of the fruits was reported to increase with the higher doses of N and K (16.36 and 16.40 mg/100 g, respectively). The fruits with minimum yield, lowest TSS, total sugars, non reducing sugars and reducing sugars were obtained with higher doses of N and K (N-750: K-600) application. Thus, the application of N and K at optimum level of 500 g/plant/year of each was found to be superior as compared to other treatments for enhancing fruit set, yield, and quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant) gave the maximum fruit set, 28.85 and 27.37%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant)e1
Outcome
fruit sete1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
28.85 and 27.37%e1
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximum fruit set (28.85 and 27.37%), fruit yield (14.94 and 14.91 kg), TSS (16.07 and 16%), total sugars (11.46 and 11.44%), non-reducing sugars (2.80 and 2.68%) and reducing sugars (9.56 and 9.58%) were recorded with the treatment N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3K4 gave the maximum fruit yield, 14.94 and 14.91 kg.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant)e1
Outcome
fruit yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
14.94 and 14.91 kge1
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximum fruit set (28.85 and 27.37%), fruit yield (14.94 and 14.91 kg), TSS (16.07 and 16%), total sugars (11.46 and 11.44%), non-reducing sugars (2.80 and 2.68%) and reducing sugars (9.56 and 9.58%) were recorded with the treatment N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3K4 gave the maximum TSS, 16.07 and 16%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant)e1
Outcome
TSSe1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
16.07 and 16%e1
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximum fruit set (28.85 and 27.37%), fruit yield (14.94 and 14.91 kg), TSS (16.07 and 16%), total sugars (11.46 and 11.44%), non-reducing sugars (2.80 and 2.68%) and reducing sugars (9.56 and 9.58%) were recorded with the treatment N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3K4 gave the maximum total sugars, 11.46 and 11.44%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant)e1
Outcome
total sugarse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
11.46 and 11.44%e1
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximum fruit set (28.85 and 27.37%), fruit yield (14.94 and 14.91 kg), TSS (16.07 and 16%), total sugars (11.46 and 11.44%), non-reducing sugars (2.80 and 2.68%) and reducing sugars (9.56 and 9.58%) were recorded with the treatment N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3K4 gave the maximum non-reducing sugars, 2.80 and 2.68%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant)e1
Outcome
non-reducing sugarse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
2.80 and 2.68%e1
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximum fruit set (28.85 and 27.37%), fruit yield (14.94 and 14.91 kg), TSS (16.07 and 16%), total sugars (11.46 and 11.44%), non-reducing sugars (2.80 and 2.68%) and reducing sugars (9.56 and 9.58%) were recorded with the treatment N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3K4 gave the maximum reducing sugars, 9.56 and 9.58%.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant)e1
Outcome
reducing sugarse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
9.56 and 9.58%e1
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The maximum fruit set (28.85 and 27.37%), fruit yield (14.94 and 14.91 kg), TSS (16.07 and 16%), total sugars (11.46 and 11.44%), non-reducing sugars (2.80 and 2.68%) and reducing sugars (9.56 and 9.58%) were recorded with the treatment N3K4 (N-500 and K 500 g/plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N5K4 and N5K5 gave the maximum fruit weight, 458.3 and 458.1 g.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
N5K4 (N-750: K-500)e2
Outcome
fruit weighte2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
458.3 and 458.1 ge2
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Whereas, maximum fruit weight (458.3 and 458.1 g) and fruits with high acidity (0.52 and 0.54%) were obtained with N5K4 (N-750: K-500) and N5K5 (N-750: K-600) for both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruits with high acidity (0.52 and 0.54%) were obtained with N5K5 (N-750: K-600).

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
N5K5 (N-750: K-600)e2
Outcome
fruits with high aciditye2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
0.52 and 0.54%e2
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Whereas, maximum fruit weight (458.3 and 458.1 g) and fruits with high acidity (0.52 and 0.54%) were obtained with N5K4 (N-750: K-500) and N5K5 (N-750: K-600) for both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C content of fruits increased with higher doses of N and K.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
higher doses of N and Ke3
Outcome
vitamin C contente3
Direction
increasee3
Value
16.36 and 16.40 mg/100 ge3
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The vitamin C content of the fruits was reported to increase with the higher doses of N and K (16.36 and 16.40 mg/100 g, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1272 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher doses of N and K (N-750: K-600) gave minimum yield, lowest TSS and lowest total sugars.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
higher doses of N and K (N-750: K-600)e4
Outcome
minimum yield, lowest TSS, total sugarse4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The fruits with minimum yield, lowest TSS, total sugars, non reducing sugars and reducing sugars were obtained with higher doses of N and K (N-750: K-600) application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher doses of N and K (N-750: K-600) gave the lowest non-reducing and reducing sugars.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
higher doses of N and K (N-750: K-600)e4
Outcome
non reducing sugars and reducing sugarse4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The fruits with minimum yield, lowest TSS, total sugars, non reducing sugars and reducing sugars were obtained with higher doses of N and K (N-750: K-600) application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude N and K at 500 g/plant/year each was superior to other treatments for fruit set, yield and quality.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
the application of N and K at optimum level of 500 g/plant/year of eache5
Outcome
fruit set, yield, and qualitye5
Direction
superiore5
Comparator
other treatmentse5
Setting
rainfed conditionst0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Thus, the application of N and K at optimum level of 500 g/plant/year of each was found to be superior as compared to other treatments for enhancing fruit set, yield, and quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1620 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate cv. Ganesh under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–101 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: general · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

potassium · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

potassium · quality: general · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · quality: phytochemicals · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

potassium · quality: phytochemicals · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.