Paper · 2015 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of foliar and soil application of urea on leaf nutrients concentrations, yield and fruit quality of pomegranate

Mohammad Hasani; Zabihollah Zamani; Gholamreza Savaghebi; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
34
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The influence of foliar application of 1% urea and four rates of urea (100, 200, 300 and 400 g tree−1) as soil application (deep fertilizer placement) were studied on leaf nutrients concentrations, yield and fruit quality of ‘Malas e Torsh e Saveh’ pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) during 2010 and 2011 growing seasons. Trees that received 300 and 400 g urea as soil application showed positive significant response on fruit yield, average fruit weight, aril weight percent of fruit, 100 arils weight, fruit diameter and TSS. Foliar application of urea had also significant effects on average fruit weight, aril weight percent of fruit and 100 arils weight. Nitrogen concentration increased linearly in leaves with the increase in rate of urea-applied. According to results, deep soil application of urea under the conditions of this study was more effective on pomegranate fruit yield and quality characters than foliar application of urea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil applied urea at 300 and 400 g increased fruit yield significantly.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
300 and 400 g urea as soil applicatione0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trees that received 300 and 400 g urea as soil application showed positive significant response on fruit yield, average fruit weight, aril weight percent of fruit, 100 arils weight, fruit diameter and TSS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil applied urea at 300 and 400 g improved average fruit weight, aril weight percentage and 100 arils weight significantly.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
300 and 400 g urea as soil applicatione0
Outcome
average fruit weight, aril weight percent of fruit, 100 arils weighte0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trees that received 300 and 400 g urea as soil application showed positive significant response on fruit yield, average fruit weight, aril weight percent of fruit, 100 arils weight, fruit diameter and TSS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil applied urea at 300 and 400 g improved fruit diameter and TSS significantly.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
300 and 400 g urea as soil applicatione0
Outcome
fruit diameter and TSSe0
Direction
positivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trees that received 300 and 400 g urea as soil application showed positive significant response on fruit yield, average fruit weight, aril weight percent of fruit, 100 arils weight, fruit diameter and TSS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–525 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar urea significantly affected average fruit weight, aril weight percentage and 100 arils weight.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Foliar application of ureae0
Outcome
average fruit weight, aril weight percent of fruit and 100 arils weighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of urea had also significant effects on average fruit weight, aril weight percent of fruit and 100 arils weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–657 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen concentration rose linearly as urea application rate increased.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
urea-appliede0
Outcome
Nitrogen concentratione0
Direction
increased linearlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen concentration increased linearly in leaves with the increase in rate of urea-applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“pomegranate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–118 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep soil urea application was judged more effective than foliar application for fruit yield and quality.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
deep soil application of ureae0
Outcome
fruit yield and quality characterse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
foliar application of ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deep soil application of urea under the conditions of this study was more effective on pomegranate fruit yield and quality characters than foliar application of urea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–941 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

application · quality: sugar starch · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 47 positive, 1 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.